Political Theater

Of course Hillary blamed her sexual predator husband’s problems were “a vast right wing conspiracy.”

Hillary was the smarter of the two; not just a suckered housewife but the leader of Team Billary. She enabled Bill. All of her "stand by your man" bullshit turned out to be Hillary standing by her political ambitions to be President.
 
Well, why should Republicans who were part of spreading the Big Lie and possibly guilty of helping coordinate Jan 6th...be on the committee investigating it? That's like cops saying they investigated themselves and found themselves innocent.

This is an Ipse dixit fallacy or sometimes called, a bald-faced assertion. That is, you are basing your claim on an unproven assertion and then using that as the basis to reject the argument.

How would it matter if the committee included implacable skeptics? If anything, having one or two on it would lend credibility as they would have presented counterarguments to the rest of the committee's assertions. Having a monolithic committee with a single viewpoint only adds to the argument made by any skeptic of their findings because no dissent was allowed. Having skeptics or adversaries on the committee would strengthen, not weaken, it. Being monolithic like it is only encourages skeptics and adversaries to question their findings more.
 
Well, why should Republicans who were part of spreading the Big Lie and possibly guilty of helping coordinate Jan 6th...be on the committee investigating it? That's like cops saying they investigated themselves and found themselves innocent.

I'm not even claiming they should waste their time on it........just don't pretend its a bipartisan committee......
 
High inflation is Biden's and the Democrats fault. They directed the Fed to print huge wads of money, which they did, causing high inflation.
If only Democrats knew how to do their own homework... (well, then they wouldn't be Democrats, would they?) ;)

Anyway, they (theoretically) could very easily pull up government inflation data and see for themselves that inflation was low and relatively steady during the Trump-era and then skyrocketed immediately after Biden was installed via election fraud. Up, up, and up some more, for a year and some change, and then Russia invaded Ukraine.

The programmers then gave the NPCs the latest "software update" and then the NPCs started repeating "Putin's price hike" over and over again. Of course, NPCs being the NPCs that they are, are unable to critically think and ask themselves, IF it truly IS "Putin's price hike", then why did this inflation issue begin a year and some change BEFORE Russia's invasion?

Obviously Russia's invasion did not cause it (and you are correct about the cause of it)...
 
...The programmers then gave the NPCs the latest "software update" and then the NPCs started repeating "Putin's price hike" over and over again. Of course, NPCs being the NPCs that they are, are unable to critically think and ask themselves, IF it truly IS "Putin's price hike", then why did this inflation issue begin a year and some change BEFORE Russia's invasion?

Obviously Russia's invasion did not cause it (and you are correct about the cause of it)...

....and you wonder why I think you are insane, Sybil. :rofl2:
 
Apparently you are insane... There is no Sybil here.
Oh, Sybil, don't play coy. Anyone who clicks on your signature can see what I mean. :thup:

73f9r4S.jpg
 
Nice try Mr. Darrow but you overlook the part where you should have at least suspected the information was improperly marked. I don't know how much experience you have with handling classified information but based on your posts I would assume zero. To help you better understand here are some FAQs about the SF312 one must sign to have access to classified.
https://www.dni.gov/files/NCSC/documents/Regulations/SF312-Frequently-Asked-Questions-Pamphlet.pdf

Hillary Clinton was not a contractor.

But your pamphlet says this..

An unauthorized disclosure of classified information is
illegal and may result in administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties


To whom are you claiming Hillary made an unauthorized disclosure?

In order to rise to a criminal penalty you need to show intent. In order to show intent, you can't argue someone should have suspected something was classified. Hillary could have been subject to administrative penalties except she had already left State so was no longer able to be retrained or be subject to such penalties.
 
Hillary Clinton was not a contractor.

But your pamphlet says this..

An unauthorized disclosure of classified information is
illegal and may result in administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties


To whom are you claiming Hillary made an unauthorized disclosure?

In order to rise to a criminal penalty you need to show intent. In order to show intent, you can't argue someone should have suspected something was classified. Hillary could have been subject to administrative penalties except she had already left State so was no longer able to be retrained or be subject to such penalties.

This has been argued to no end. All I will add is read FBI director Comey's report to congress he lays out the findings. If you want to white wash his testimony in your liberal mind have a nut.
 
no it hasn't.

we're still a beacon of freedom for the entire world.

Think about what you just claimed, AssHat.
Who wants to come here? People from even worse places. People from places that we're becoming more like.

You don't see many people from the EU nations in any hurry to come here. They have a better standard of living than ours in all the important ways.
They have socialized medicine. They have accessible education. They have more protection for workers and consumers.

Most of all, they don't glorify ignorance the way Middle America does. They visit here so we can entertain them with our weirdness.
 
Think about what you just claimed, AssHat.
Who wants to come here? People from even worse places. People from places that we're becoming more like.

You don't see many people from the EU nations in any hurry to come here. They have a better standard of living than ours in all the important ways.
They have socialized medicine. They have accessible education. They have more protection for workers and consumers.

Most of all, they don't glorify ignorance the way Middle America does. They visit here so we can entertain them with our weirdness.

your points are stupid.

we're still a beacon of freedom.
 
If Trump wants to be sworn in and offer a defense under oath, I'd be all for that. It's absurd that he's never been questioned under oath.

Discard of the Constitution of the United States. You are ignoring Article I and the 5th and 6th amendments again.
 
You mean all those Trump defenders refusing to answer subpoenas are being denied their right to defend themselves? They all have been given ample opportunities to give their side yet not a single one of them has volunteered to say so under oath. No a one will defend Trump under oath in front of an official hearing. They have plenty to say on Fox, Twitter and wherever else they can spout their bullshit but never under oath.

Discard of the Constitution. You are again ignoring Article I, and the 5th amendment.
 
That's what I've said. If this is hurting the Dems then why are Republicans so upset about it and spending SOOOO FUCKING MUCH TIME insisting nobody cares? Clearly somebody cares and they care a hell of a lot.

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. Discard of the Constitution.
 
Back
Top