blackascoal
The Force is With Me
No, it isn't .. but the reality of what Obama/Boehner have done to this country is even worse.
Poll: 60% of Americans Opposed to Syria Attack, Just 9% Support it
- Thread starter blackascoal
- Start date
No, it isn't .. but the reality of what Obama/Boehner have done to this country is even worse.
Amen
Bill O’Reilly Battles Military Experts Over U.S. Intervention in Syria – and Gets Double-Teamed
Bill O’Reilly made it crystal clear on Tuesday that he supports U.S. intervention in war torn Syria following reports of the regime using chemical weapons. In fact, he actually called opponents of intervention “loons” earlier in the day.
But the TV host found himself double-teamed by two military analysts, Lt. Col. Ralph Peters and Col. David Hunt, who both agree there are still too many unknowns in Syria to justify military action
Peters argued the U.S. is considering “helping Al Qaeda” to stop Syrian President Bashar Assad, a “murderer.”
“On one side you have Assad, Hezbollah, Iran — horrible people. On the other side, it’s increasingly dominated by Al Qaeda…the team that brought you 9/11.
Right now, in Syria, our enemies are killing each other,” he said. “Where in our Constitution does it say we should stop our enemies from killing each other?”
O’Reilly said the situation in Syria is “humanitarian issue” and the violation of the Geneva Convention justifies U.S. action. “If that is allowed to stand, forget about it, it’s going to be used all over the world,” he added.
Hunt pushed back, reminding O’Reilly that it has not been conclusively confirmed that chemical weapons were used or that it was the Assad regime and not the Syrian rebels that used them.
O’Reilly said the U.S. had to “assume” that Assad used chemical weapons and told the two military experts they sound like those who argued against U.S. intervention in World War II.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...rvention-in-syria-military-experts-push-back/
Link has video -
how INSANE IS THIS?? gota go to FOX for push back on this intervention?
I would have thought MSNBC -silly me - mouthpiece for the Obama Adm.
Bill O’Reilly made it crystal clear on Tuesday that he supports U.S. intervention in war torn Syria following reports of the regime using chemical weapons. In fact, he actually called opponents of intervention “loons” earlier in the day.
But the TV host found himself double-teamed by two military analysts, Lt. Col. Ralph Peters and Col. David Hunt, who both agree there are still too many unknowns in Syria to justify military action
Peters argued the U.S. is considering “helping Al Qaeda” to stop Syrian President Bashar Assad, a “murderer.”
“On one side you have Assad, Hezbollah, Iran — horrible people. On the other side, it’s increasingly dominated by Al Qaeda…the team that brought you 9/11.
Right now, in Syria, our enemies are killing each other,” he said. “Where in our Constitution does it say we should stop our enemies from killing each other?”
O’Reilly said the situation in Syria is “humanitarian issue” and the violation of the Geneva Convention justifies U.S. action. “If that is allowed to stand, forget about it, it’s going to be used all over the world,” he added.
Hunt pushed back, reminding O’Reilly that it has not been conclusively confirmed that chemical weapons were used or that it was the Assad regime and not the Syrian rebels that used them.
O’Reilly said the U.S. had to “assume” that Assad used chemical weapons and told the two military experts they sound like those who argued against U.S. intervention in World War II.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...rvention-in-syria-military-experts-push-back/
Link has video -
how INSANE IS THIS?? gota go to FOX for push back on this intervention?
I would have thought MSNBC -silly me - mouthpiece for the Obama Adm.
Liberty
Libertarian Minded
Bill O’Reilly is a loon. He always has been.
cawacko
Well-known member
Bill O’Reilly Battles Military Experts Over U.S. Intervention in Syria – and Gets Double-Teamed
Bill O’Reilly made it crystal clear on Tuesday that he supports U.S. intervention in war torn Syria following reports of the regime using chemical weapons. In fact, he actually called opponents of intervention “loons” earlier in the day.
But the TV host found himself double-teamed by two military analysts, Lt. Col. Ralph Peters and Col. David Hunt, who both agree there are still too many unknowns in Syria to justify military action
Peters argued the U.S. is considering “helping Al Qaeda” to stop Syrian President Bashar Assad, a “murderer.”
“On one side you have Assad, Hezbollah, Iran — horrible people. On the other side, it’s increasingly dominated by Al Qaeda…the team that brought you 9/11.
Right now, in Syria, our enemies are killing each other,” he said. “Where in our Constitution does it say we should stop our enemies from killing each other?”
O’Reilly said the situation in Syria is “humanitarian issue” and the violation of the Geneva Convention justifies U.S. action. “If that is allowed to stand, forget about it, it’s going to be used all over the world,” he added.
Hunt pushed back, reminding O’Reilly that it has not been conclusively confirmed that chemical weapons were used or that it was the Assad regime and not the Syrian rebels that used them.
O’Reilly said the U.S. had to “assume” that Assad used chemical weapons and told the two military experts they sound like those who argued against U.S. intervention in World War II.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...rvention-in-syria-military-experts-push-back/
Link has video -
how INSANE IS THIS?? gota go to FOX for push back on this intervention?
I would have thought MSNBC -silly me - mouthpiece for the Obama Adm.
Not that it really matters but is there a consensus among the MSNBC commentators for or against involvement in Syria?
I only saw Morning Joe today, it seemed to be all one sided - various reasons for the intervention.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Bill O’Reilly Battles Military Experts Over U.S. Intervention in Syria – and Gets Double-Teamed
Bill O’Reilly made it crystal clear on Tuesday that he supports U.S. intervention in war torn Syria following reports of the regime using chemical weapons. In fact, he actually called opponents of intervention “loons” earlier in the day.
But the TV host found himself double-teamed by two military analysts, Lt. Col. Ralph Peters and Col. David Hunt, who both agree there are still too many unknowns in Syria to justify military action
Peters argued the U.S. is considering “helping Al Qaeda” to stop Syrian President Bashar Assad, a “murderer.”
“On one side you have Assad, Hezbollah, Iran — horrible people. On the other side, it’s increasingly dominated by Al Qaeda…the team that brought you 9/11.
Right now, in Syria, our enemies are killing each other,” he said. “Where in our Constitution does it say we should stop our enemies from killing each other?”
O’Reilly said the situation in Syria is “humanitarian issue” and the violation of the Geneva Convention justifies U.S. action. “If that is allowed to stand, forget about it, it’s going to be used all over the world,” he added.
Hunt pushed back, reminding O’Reilly that it has not been conclusively confirmed that chemical weapons were used or that it was the Assad regime and not the Syrian rebels that used them.
O’Reilly said the U.S. had to “assume” that Assad used chemical weapons and told the two military experts they sound like those who argued against U.S. intervention in World War II.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...rvention-in-syria-military-experts-push-back/
Link has video -
how INSANE IS THIS?? gota go to FOX for push back on this intervention?
I would have thought MSNBC -silly me - mouthpiece for the Obama Adm.
So Bill says we have to "assume" it was Assad...anyone want to remind him what happens to those who ASSume?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I can't stand O'Reilly, but I understand the emotional nature of the response.
Personally, I can relate to it more than I can relate to some of the comments that are dismissive of the kind of epic tragedy that's gone on over there...
Personally, I can relate to it more than I can relate to some of the comments that are dismissive of the kind of epic tragedy that's gone on over there...
signalmankenneth
Verified User
No U.S. Military Intervention in Syria! Petition
http://www.credomobilize.com/petitions/no-u-s-military-intervention-in-syria
http://www.credomobilize.com/petitions/no-u-s-military-intervention-in-syria