Cancel 2016.11
Darla
yes it is.
it always will be
Well, call me crazy, but I don't think piling up an additional few thousand bodies is a sane response. You wouldn't either if a republican wanted to do it.
yes it is.
it always will be
why do you think they will indescriminately bomb?
There is no way we just sit back and allow a leader to kill people so they can keep control.
never again do we sit and watch a WWII just get out of control before we step in.
WWI was why we hesitated.
hesitating now would be the same thing
It's not nothing. But it's a loonnnnngggggg way from the Holocaust, which is what you are ludicrously attempting to compare it to.
Most importantly - air strikes only kill more children. That is what they do. Always. Period. The End.
ask the dead babies if they wish someone had bombed the delivery system before they were gassed
Well, call me crazy, but I don't think piling up an additional few thousand bodies is a sane response. You wouldn't either if a republican wanted to do it.
I don't think so.
"we just allow them to massacre their population"
Sorry but two hundred dead is in no way a massacre of a country's population. I can make a much better case that the United States is massacring its population via lack of health care.
It's not nothing. But it's a loonnnnngggggg way from the Holocaust, which is what you are ludicrously attempting to compare it to.
Most importantly - air strikes only kill more children. That is what they do. Always. Period. The End.
Most importantly - air strikes only kill more children. That is what they do. Always. Period. The End.
Its likely she is so anti war she cant think straight on the issue
Your numbers are way off. Over 100,000 people have been killed in this civil war so far. At the rate Assad's killing his own people, there won't be any more of those children you're mourning left anyhow.
.[/B]
Why is that, Darla? Because they're used as human shields. The government's embedding itself in schools and hospitals and residential neighborhoods, knowing full well that bleeding hearts like you will scream "WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN!"
[/B]
Why would a regime, even a brutal dictatorship, send its thugs to kill women and children, even babies? Does it make any sense, even by the twisted logic of armed conflict and tyranny?
In a most perverse, sickening way, it makes perfect sense. And for the logic underlying this most inhuman tactic, one need only look at what has transpired in recent months and years as uprisings have sprung throughout the region, from Iran to Tunisia.
The Syrian dictator is trying to restore a balance of fear, perhaps the most powerful weapon in the hands of tyrants throughout history. Killing children is supposed to intimidate the opposition.