President Trump blames Obama for the Iran nuclear program

christiefan915 said:
If they've been screaming "death to America" for FORTY YEARS, clearly it's just a slogan, not a threat.
Click to expand...


​

Iranian and Iranian-Backed Attacks Against Americans (1979-Present)​


November 2024: A report released by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies indicates that Iran and its proxies have conducted more than 180 attacks against U.S. forces in the Middle East between October 17, 2023, and November 19, 2024, resulting in more than 180 wounded and three killed U.S. service members.


How much of that money Obama gave back to Iran was used to help commit the above?
 
Last edited:
christiefan915 said:
Is America dead? Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad etc. are not Iran.
Click to expand...
All backed and funded by Iran...Finland has not funded them

And the IRA in 1940 was not Nazi Germany SO FUCKING WHAT!

Nazi Germany, in 1940, collaborated with and provided support to the Irish Republican Army (IRA), a paramilitary group seeking to remove Northern Ireland from the United Kingdom
 
Last edited:
volsrocks said:
All backed and funded by Iran...Finland has not funded them

And the IRA in 1940 was not Nazi Germany SO FUCKING WHAT!

Nazi Germany, in 1940, collaborated with and provided support to the Irish Republican Army (IRA), a paramilitary group seeking to remove Northern Ireland from the United Kingdom
Click to expand...
Do you want the US to attack Iran? Because it sure sounds like you have no problem with getting us into a foreign war between two other countries.
 
serendipity said:
Yes I do, Iran was near bankrupt and that money helped considerably to buy new weapons. That money should have been used as compensation for all the terrorism initiated Iran and for the Carter hostage crisis.
Click to expand...
The Bush "October Surprise", CIA installed Shah Pahvil, Obama deal kept uranium enrichment down, Trump tears it up, now its up to 70%. Netanyahu has been lying about Iran's nuke capability for 30 years, as documented by the IAEA.
GET EDUCATED MAN!
 
christiefan915 said:
⁶
So has the US. Read it and weep.

United States and state-sponsored terrorism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...

Did any of those have nuclear weapons or aspire to produce them and their delivery systems? Where does that stop would you be ok with Afghanistan, Yemen or Saudi Arabia.having nukes as well? I always find it amazing how so many on the Left are against nuclear weapons yet somehow don't see the problem with Iran having them.

Iran has always aspired to be part of the West not run by a bunch of geriatric old bastards who are intent on keeping a religious theocracy held together by brute force. No doubt Phanny was on the front lines protesting against the Shah and Savak.
 
Last edited:
serendipity said:
Did any of those have nuclear weapons or aspire to produce them and their delivery systems? Where does that stop would you be ok with Afghanistan, Yemen or Saudi Arabia.having nukes as well? I always find it amazing how so many on the Left are against nuclear weapons yet somehow don't see the problem with Iran having them.
Click to expand...
Iran neither has nuclear weapons, and they have not tried to build one so far as Western Experts know since 2003.

Also Iran is currently within all of their agreements and international law.
 
Iran is willing, with the right deal, to go back to super low enrichment, and again give everything they have above that to the Russians.

The Imperial Empire refused to do such a deal because this was never about nuclear weapons.....this is about the destruction of Iran.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Iran neither has nuclear weapons, and they have not tried to build one so far as Western Experts know since 2003.

Also Iran is currently within all of their agreements and international law.
Click to expand...

Total bullshit, so then tell me why they are enriching uranium up to 60% for which there is no peaceful purpose. Whilst you're about it why are they producing ballistic missiles that can deliver conventional, chemical, biological and nuclear payloads. Why did they have so many nuclear weapons experts, well leastways they did, until Israel wiped them out in one fell swoop.
 
serendipity said:
Did any of those have nuclear weapons or aspire to produce them and their delivery systems? Where does that stop would you be ok with Afghanistan, Yemen or Saudi Arabia.having nukes as well? I always find it amazing how so many on the Left are against nuclear weapons yet somehow don't see the problem with Iran having them.

Iran has always aspired to be part of the West not run by a bunch of geriatric old bastards who are intent on keeping a religious theocracy held together by brute force. No doubt Phanny was on the front lines protesting against the Shah and Savak.
Click to expand...
I don't even like that WE have nukes. I'm against nukes, period. I'm against Iran getting nukes just like you, but our views are still different. I distrust anybody who has that kind of weaponry but you seem to be against them only if you don't like the country.

I don't know what trump is planning, but I see the irony of the US thinking it's righteous to bomb Iran because of their conflict with Israel, while claiming that the US has the moral high ground. Maybe we should stay out of other countries' wars altogether, and work on our own problems.

1750474633968.png
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Iran is willing, with the right deal, to go back to super low enrichment, and again give everything they have above that to the Russians.

The Imperial Empire refused to do such a deal because this was never about nuclear weapons.....this is about the destruction of Iran.
Click to expand...
God, I hate when I agree with you. lol
 
christiefan915 said:
I don't even like that WE have nukes. I'm against nukes, period. I'm against Iran getting nukes just like you, but our views are still different. I distrust anybody who has that kind of weaponry but you seem to be against them only if you don't like the country.

I don't know what trump is planning, but I see the irony of the US thinking it's righteous to bomb Iran because of their conflict with Israel, while claiming that the US has the moral high ground. Maybe we should stay out of other countries' wars altogether, and work on our own problems.

View attachment 52784
Click to expand...
 
christiefan915 said:
It was their money to start with. Do you think we should have kept it?

"Kirk, founder of conservative student group Turning Point USA, was likely referring to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which granted Iran access to frozen assets.

This was not funding given to Iran. The amount quoted refers to foreign assets that belonged to Iran and were frozen by sanctions imposed to impede its nuclear program. The JCPOA was also an international agreement between Iran and a number of major world powers, including the U.S."

www.newsweek.com

Fact Check: Did the US under Obama give Iran $150 Billion?

U.S. is said to have handed $150 billion to Iran eight years ago, as tensions between the two nations worsen.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
Click to expand...
Dippity Do is an absolute moron. He doesn't deserve the keystrokes it takes to educate him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top