Sure, but you can't realistically survive with all of those services if you still don't have a job.
Lots of people do it on a daily basis.
Sure, but you can't realistically survive with all of those services if you still don't have a job.
When ALL do, there is no need to provide names. Even you acknowledged Democrats support such things.
Sure, but none of the ones with real support do. That's because most Democrats would never support someone who thinks everything should be free.
Sure, but you can't realistically survive with all of those services if you still don't have a job.
They can still get a job. I don't think most Americans want to to fully support able-bodied people who choose not to work.
Yeah, which is how it should be. Like I said, no Democrat wants to just make everything free. What they want is to have a more level playing field, especially for people who were born with massive disadvantages.
Stop hijacking my threads you pos
They can still get a job. I don't think most Americans want to to fully support able-bodied people who choose not to work.
"The Cato Institute notes there are 126 separate federal programs available for low-income individuals. There are even more options when state programs and non-means-tested programs are added.
The state with the highest total value of welfare benefits was Hawaii, at $49,175. The lowest was Mississippi, at $16,984. Welfare packages in only 10 states, plus Washington, D.C., exceeded...$35,000."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news.../grothman-single-parents-welfare/?arc404=true
Many do not qualify. Nor can haters understand that lots of people do not want to do welfare. https://www.thebalance.com/welfare-programs-definition-and-list-3305759 If you get housing, you have to chip in 30 percent of your income to help pay for it.