Question for fans of multiracialism

CFM said:
You've called me a troll. Do you have any examples of that?
Click to expand...

Yes. The most recent one is claiming that I'm an Obama supporter despite not having any evidence.

It's an especially funny claim since in the OP of this thread, I'm talking about how multiracialism doesn't work. Obama shouldn't have ever been president because he's not white.
 
StoneByStone said:
Yes. The most recent one is claiming that I'm an Obama supporter despite not having any evidence.

It's an especially funny claim since in the OP of this thread, I'm talking about how multiracialism doesn't work. Obama shouldn't have ever been president because he's not white.
Click to expand...

I provided evidence and let you pick which specific post you like best.

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.

For you to call me a troll, you would have to prove that my intent is to distract or sow discord and provoke emotional responses. To do that, you'd have to be to do things you simply can't do. If someone has an emotional response to the truth, that has nothing to do with me but their own insecurities or realization they've been shown the truth.
 
StoneByStone said:
People generally feel more comfortable with people that have similar genetics. Simple as that.

We can speculate on why this is. Maybe it's because people with similar genetics think similarly and have similar experiences. Even white people who don't consider themselves Nationalists or care about race still, on some level, know that they're in the same boat as other white people, because they're all having the white experience, whether they like it or not. I think something like that is a cause for self-segregation, though I think cognitive abilities and evolutionary factors also play a role.
Another factor is that with multiracialism, there is a constant fight over representation. Racially homogeneous societies are just a lot more simple, nobody is calling you racist because your store doesn't employ enough black people. Right now, we're seeing the Left lose to an actual retard because the Democrats are being forced to suck up to black and brown people at the expense of white people.

So yeah, there are a few reasons why people choose to self-segregate based on race.
Click to expand...

People don't get to pick and choose their race, their parents or their genetic make-up. Jobs, education, services etc. are not denied to the minority of people who have green eyes, detached earlobes or color blindness, for example. But for some reason skin color is a red flag.

It's cruel and bigoted to punish people for something they have no control over.
 
christiefan915 said:
People don't get to pick and choose their race, their parents or their genetic make-up. Jobs, education, services etc. are not denied to the minority of people who have green eyes, detached earlobes or color blindness, for example. But for some reason skin color is a red flag.

It's cruel and bigoted to punish people for something they have no control over.
Click to expand...

She did and idiots bought into it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Dolezal


I'm glad you agree that forcing people to pay taxes to fund things on someone else's behalf and for which they had not control is bigoted and cruel.
 
christiefan915 said:
People don't get to pick and choose their race, their parents or their genetic make-up. Jobs, education, services etc. are not denied to the minority of people who have green eyes, detached earlobes or color blindness, for example. But for some reason skin color is a red flag.

It's cruel and bigoted to punish people for something they have no control over.
Click to expand...

It's not about punishing or rewarding anyone, it's about letting people have freedom of association. People should be allowed to discriminate against whoever they want in private businesses.
The reason people choose to self-segregate along racial lines is because race is much more than skin color. Like I said before, it's also about genetics and experience.
 
StoneByStone said:
It's not about punishing or rewarding anyone, it's about letting people have freedom of association. People should be allowed to discriminate against whoever they want in private businesses.
The reason people choose to self-segregate along racial lines is because race is much more than skin color. Like I said before, it's also about genetics and experience.
Click to expand...

Well yes, it is. Your first post was to protest affirmative action and anti-discrimination laws. These don't address freedom of association only. They try to keep businesses, schools and other entities from punishing people because of their race or other physical characteristics they have no control over. I'm sure you know that AA has benefited women more than any others, and women are the majority in this country. Do you think it's fair that women have been passed over for jobs and promotions because of their gender... because the minority in the US think they're not good enough?

I agree with you to a point about freedom of association. There are millions of places in the US where people can live among others of their mindset. If you don't like blacks, move to Vermont or West Virginia. If you want to live among lots of white supremacists, move to the south. I disagree that people/companies/schools should be allowed to discriminate legally against those whose skin color or gender they hate. Again, it's punishment for something the individual has no control over.
 
christiefan915 said:
Well yes, it is. Your first post was to protest affirmative action and anti-discrimination laws. These don't address freedom of association only. They try to keep businesses, schools and other entities from punishing people because of their race or other physical characteristics they have no control over. I'm sure you know that AA has benefited women more than any others, and women are the majority in this country. Do you think it's fair that women have been passed over for jobs and promotions because of their gender... because the minority in the US think they're not good enough?

I agree with you to a point about freedom of association. There are millions of places in the US where people can live among others of their mindset. If you don't like blacks, move to Vermont or West Virginia. If you want to live among lots of white supremacists, move to the south. I disagree that people/companies/schools should be allowed to discriminate legally against those whose skin color or gender they hate. Again, it's punishment for something the individual has no control over.
Click to expand...

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
 
christiefan915 said:
Well yes, it is. Your first post was to protest affirmative action and anti-discrimination laws. These don't address freedom of association only. They try to keep businesses, schools and other entities from punishing people because of their race or other physical characteristics they have no control over.
Click to expand...

If business-owners are allowed to hire and deny service to who they want, then they have freedom of association. They are legally allowed to associate with, or not associate with, whoever they want. If the government is forcing them to hire and do business with people they don't want to be around, then they don't have freedom of association. Sure, it might not be completely fair, because nobody chooses their race, but freedom of association isn't about fairness. If an ugly guy likes a girl who doesn't like him, that's not fair, but that girl still has the right to not be with that guy. We wouldn't say the government should force her to date the guy, because it's not his fault he's not attractive enough for her.


I'm sure you know that AA has benefited women more than any others, and women are the majority in this country. Do you think it's fair that women have been passed over for jobs and promotions because of their gender... because the minority in the US think they're not good enough?
Click to expand...

No, but I still think it's wrong to force people to hire women if they don't want to. Personally, I would never refuse to hire people because of gender or sexual orientation, but if other people want to do that, they should have the right.

I agree with you to a point about freedom of association. There are millions of places in the US where people can live among others of their mindset. If you don't like blacks, move to Vermont or West Virginia. If you want to live among lots of white supremacists, move to the south. I disagree that people/companies/schools should be allowed to discriminate legally against those whose skin color or gender they hate. Again, it's punishment for something the individual has no control over.
Click to expand...

While I still think everyone should have freedom of association, this wouldn't be so bad if we didn't have mass non-white immigration. It's getting to the point where we're running out of white states in the country. And even if the South did stay mostly white, we still have way too many minorities in America. They're voting their interests, which is fair and normal, but it's happening at the expense of the white population. This is just another reason why Ethnic Nationalism works far better than multiracialism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top