Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

domer76 said:
When did you have your traumatic brain injury?
Click to expand...

That's all you've got; because every time you get your ass handed to you, you fall back into your self-defense behavior and continue to act like even more of an idiot.

095ea45e2311cd42867eb1923bf858c3.gif
 
domer76 said:
The solution is obvious, idiot. Start heavy regulation of guns, and at some point, our gun death rate will start to fall in line with the rest of the civilized world.

But, you stupid fucking barrel strokers won’t allow that to happen. So, get used to 40,000 deaths per year. That blood is on the hands of shitstains like you.
Click to expand...
The obvious problem with your "obvious" solution is that it has never happened that way anywhere in the world. Either gun laws are unnecessary to begin with and nothing changes, or there are problems with guns and violent crime, which only get worse after strict gun laws go into effect.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
domer76 said:
The solution is obvious, idiot. Start heavy regulation of guns, and at some point, our gun death rate will start to fall in line with the rest of the civilized world.

But, you stupid fucking barrel strokers won’t allow that to happen. So, get used to 40,000 deaths per year. That blood is on the hands of shitstains like you.
Click to expand...

Please explain how regulating law abiding citizens is going to cause criminals from committing crimes??

AND you also seem to be suggesting that people won't be committing suicide, anymore!!

:facepalm:
 
domer76 said:
One murder. Just fucking hilarious. You’re so fucking stupid, you don’t even realize that you’re proving my point.
Click to expand...
Yet machine guns weren't a real problem before they were banned. So your "point" is meaningless, as usual.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
The obvious problem with your "obvious" solution is that it has never happened that way anywhere in the world. Either gun laws are unnecessary to begin with and nothing changes, or there are problems with guns and violent crime, which only get worse after strict gun laws go into effect.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Let’s try again, dumbfuck. What are the gun death rates in western societies, where guns are highly regulated? Why do you want to avoid answering that question?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Please explain how regulating law abiding citizens is going to cause criminals from committing crimes??

AND you also seem to be suggesting that people won't be committing suicide, anymore!!

:facepalm:
Click to expand...


Jesus Christ. You two fucks are the most illiterate shitstains on the forum. Where did I ever say there wouldn’t be any more suicides?
 
rjhenn said:
Yet machine guns weren't a real problem before they were banned. So your "point" is meaningless, as usual.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


They weren’t? Pretty commonly used in the gangs of the 20s and 30s. But, a dumbfuck of your magnitude would not know that.
 
domer76 said:
I just gave you the answer, you illiterate shitstain. Why is English such a challenge for you?
Click to expand...

You gave AN answer and the one you're comfortable with; but like most cowards, you continue to avoid the question of:

Which law has prevented anything from occurring?
 
domer76 said:
Let’s try again, dumbfuck. What are the gun death rates in western societies, where guns are highly regulated? Why do you want to avoid answering that question?
Click to expand...
Why do you keep avoiding the reality that those countries had minimal gun death rates before they had any gun control laws? Why do you also keep avoiding the fact that there are many countries where guns are highly regulated that have far worse problems with guns and violent crime than we do? Again, it's clear by looking at the entire world that gun control laws only ‘work' if they were unnecessary in the first place. You can't point to a single gun control law that has been demonstrated to have made things better. And you keep avoiding that.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You gave AN answer and the one you're comfortable with; but like most cowards, you continue to avoid the question of:

Which law has prevented anything from occurring?
Click to expand...

How many machine gun deaths ars there, dumbfuck?

What is the gun death rate in the UK? In Canada? In Australia? In Japan?

Why can’t you address that simple concept?
 
rjhenn said:
Why do you keep avoiding the reality that those countries had minimal gun death rates before they had any gun control laws? Why do you also keep avoiding the fact that there are many countries where guns are highly regulated that have far worse problems with guns and violent crime than we do? Again, it's clear by looking at the entire world that gun control laws only ‘work' if they were unnecessary in the first place. You can't point to a single gun control law that has been demonstrated to have made things better. And you keep avoiding that.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

He obviously knows that answering the question regarding a law that has made things better, completely destroys his ranting and raving. :good4u:
 
domer76 said:
They weren’t? Pretty commonly used in the gangs of the 20s and 30s. But, a dumbfuck of your magnitude would not know that.
Click to expand...
Not really. It was a single event, The*Saint Valentine's Day Massacre of 1929, with 7 dead, that was the impetus behind the Gun Control Act of 1936, that restricted machine guns and other weapons. There were few deaths before that and few after, which didn't prevent rampant paranoia from passing further restrictions 50 years later.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top