Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

Why do you keep avoiding the reality that those countries had minimal gun death rates before they had any gun control laws? Why do you also keep avoiding the fact that there are many countries where guns are highly regulated that have far worse problems with guns and violent crime than we do? Again, it's clear by looking at the entire world that gun control laws only ‘work' if they were unnecessary in the first place. You can't point to a single gun control law that has been demonstrated to have made things better. And you keep avoiding that.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Yeah, keep pointing to third world countries, moron. Honduras, Brazil, Venezuela

I’ve pointed to the difficulty of obtaining guns across the world and why their gun death rates are so much lower. That should be self evident to anyone except the brain damaged.

How many up close and personal gun deaths have you seen?
 
How many machine gun deaths ars there, dumbfuck?

What is the gun death rate in the UK? In Canada? In Australia? In Japan?

Why can’t you address that simple concept?
Because it's a meaningless fantasy. The gun death rate in those countries was low before they had any gun control laws and is virtually unchanged now. You still can't point to a single gun control law that has ever been demonstrated to have made things better. Why do you keep avoiding that? It's obviously because you can't find any.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Yeah, keep pointing to third world countries, moron. Honduras, Brazil, Venezuela

I’ve pointed to the difficulty of obtaining guns across the world and why their gun death rates are so much lower. That should be self evident to anyone except the brain damaged.

How many up close and personal gun deaths have you seen?

Which law has prevented anything from occurring?
 
Yeah, keep pointing to third world countries, moron. Honduras, Brazil, Venezuela

I’ve pointed to the difficulty of obtaining guns across the world and why their gun death rates are so much lower. That should be self evident to anyone except the brain damaged.

How many up close and personal gun deaths have you seen?

Your refusal to consider the entire world is just an admission that gun control is not the panacea that you want it to be, and that there are other factors with much greater influence.
You continue to ignore the fact that those countries with low gun death rates had low gun death rates before they had any gun control laws. Those laws haven't changed anything. Your experiences with gun deaths appear to have damaged your brain.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Because it's a meaningless fantasy. The gun death rate in those countries was low before they had any gun control laws and is virtually unchanged now. You still can't point to a single gun control law that has ever been demonstrated to have made things better. Why do you keep avoiding that? It's obviously because you can't find any.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Tell us why their gun death rate is low.
 
Your refusal to consider the entire world is just an admission that gun control is not the panacea that you want it to be, and that there are other factors with much greater influence.
You continue to ignore the fact that those countries with low gun death rates had low gun death rates before they had any gun control laws. Those laws haven't changed anything. Your experiences with gun deaths appear to have damaged your brain.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Your inexperience with gun deaths makes you ignorant
 
It's clearly driven you insane.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Hardly, dumbshit. I’m just aware of reality.

Tell me about your up close and personal with any gun death. Do you even have a fucking clue of what they look like? No, you don’t, because you speak out of ignorance.
 
How many machine gun deaths last year, bitch? Answer that question. Any dumbfuck will realize what law prevents deaths. But you’re too fucking stupid to grasp the point.
There were very few even before they were restricted. So very little difference. What few there were were the result of Prohibition, another failed solution based on banning something.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Hardly, dumbshit. I’m just aware of reality.

Tell me about your up close and personal with any gun death. Do you even have a fucking clue of what they look like? No, you don’t, because you speak out of ignorance.

No, you're clearly obsessed with guns, to the point where you're completely out of touch with reality. No arguments, just rants and childish insults.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
There were very few even before they were restricted. So very little difference. What few there were were the result of Prohibition, another failed solution based on banning something.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Sad, pathetic fuck that thinks that strict gun regulation, in the long run, won’t reduce gun gun deaths. The rest of the world proves you’re a fucking idiot.
 
Sad, pathetic fuck that thinks that strict gun regulation, in the long run, won’t reduce gun gun deaths. The rest of the world proves you’re a fucking idiot.
The rest of the world proves that you have nothing but wishful thinking.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
No, you're clearly obsessed with guns, to the point where you're completely out of touch with reality. No arguments, just rants and childish insults.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

How many gun deaths have you been up close and personal with, shitstain? Give me a number.
 
Back
Top