Don't expect domer to acknowledge this; because he evidently believes that prior to the gun ban zones, everything was unicorns and rainbows.
It’s obvious that neither one of you idiots have a grasp of English.
Were you both homeschooled?
Don't expect domer to acknowledge this; because he evidently believes that prior to the gun ban zones, everything was unicorns and rainbows.
In many parts of the country it was not unusual to have actual classes in shooting, which usually had kids bringing their own guns from home. They would even ride the subway with their guns in NYC. In other cases, kids would take guns to school so they could go hunting after school. Schools became gun free with the passage of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. It's after that that mass school shootings really took off.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Your answer didn't actually answer the question. Again, nothing but bad logic, wishful thinking and childish insults. You appear to be incapable of adult conversation
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Yes you are. As demonstrated by the half-assed way you ducked the question.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Basically, you just cleaned up the mess afterwards, right?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Your paranoia and insanity. Both things that I, thankfully, lack.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Actually, not that many. It was the Saint Valentine's Day Massacre, with 7 dead, that was behind the restrictions on machine guns. Then, despite there being fewer than 5 deaths from legally possessed machine gun fire in the intervening 50 years, civilian ownership of machine guns manufactured after the passage of the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1996 was essentially banned.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
It's cheaper than that new computer lab. Did you know that schools have funding to build WHOLE NEW SCHOOLS?Yeah, Utah, the land of funny underwear. How many school districts do you think have the funds to do those retrofits?
Argument of the stone.There are too many bullshit “if/woulds” in your post to even begin to address them.
Canned insult using a meaningless buzzword. You have no idea what 'reality' even means.Try dealing with reality for once.
Nope. A SCOTUS decision is a ruling. An opinion is not a ruling.A SCOTUS decision IS an opinion.
Heller's opinion doesn't count as a ruling either, but he did win his case.You can try to play words games but it doesn’t change the ruling/deision/opinion of Heller.
They don't have the authority to change the Constitution of the United States.Guns have always been regulated and, for the most part, the courts have upheld those regulations.
Inversion fallacy. The law in question is the Constitution of the United States. ALL other federal laws and most State laws MUST conform to that constitution. State laws must also conform to their own State constitutions, which contain similar wording in many cases about guns.Your ignorance of law is astounding
Here is the “ruling”, dumbfuck . Scroll down to page 54. Read it and weep, fool.
It says:
Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
You were homeschooled, weren’t you?
Thanks for finally admitting that firearms can be restricted.
And take a look here, dumfuck. At the end of Heller. What word jumps out at you?
SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined.
I wonder if domer or Stone can show how many school shootings occurred prior to the "Gun Free Zones" were put into place??
Unless such information would totally destroy their entire rantings and ravings.
How many machine gun deaths have occurred?
What is the gun death rates in western cultures that have strict gun control?
Google Heller yet, lazy dumbass? P54-56:
“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.”
Since the original intent was in the context of a militia, rather than idiots of your level thinking you can carry any gun, anywhere, anytime, you’re the one ignorant of the original intent.
You’re an Illiterate fool. You also don’t have a fucking clue whether not having guns at schools has made things worse.
Why do you like to lie so much?
It's you who has a problem with reality. You just admitted that you don't really care about the children. For you, it's only about more restrictions on guns.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Yeah, he and four other justices are wrong and a clueless punk like you isn’t. Priceless!
Yeah, I know. I know, sonny boy.
How many machine gun deaths are there?