Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

In many parts of the country it was not unusual to have actual classes in shooting, which usually had kids bringing their own guns from home. They would even ride the subway with their guns in NYC. In other cases, kids would take guns to school so they could go hunting after school. Schools became gun free with the passage of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. It's after that that mass school shootings really took off.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

False assumption of cause and effect. Same shit the Bible thumpers use. That schools declined when they stopped reading the Bible

Homeschool fucks you up that way.
 
Your answer didn't actually answer the question. Again, nothing but bad logic, wishful thinking and childish insults. You appear to be incapable of adult conversation


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Asked and answered, stupid shit
 
Yes you are. As demonstrated by the half-assed way you ducked the question.




Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

When I was 20, you weren’t even born yet. That means, in English, dumbfuck, that I’ve been around the block. Yet, here you are, a mindless homeschooled punk.
 
Last edited:
Your paranoia and insanity. Both things that I, thankfully, lack.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Since you post out of ignorance rather than reality and experience, you have not a clue what you’re talking about.

Your pattern is inserting your fucked up interpretation rather than comprehending what was actually said. Did your mommy also miss English comprehension as well as history and logic? What did she cover, homeschool? Recess?
 
Actually, not that many. It was the Saint Valentine's Day Massacre, with 7 dead, that was behind the restrictions on machine guns. Then, despite there being fewer than 5 deaths from legally possessed machine gun fire in the intervening 50 years, civilian ownership of machine guns manufactured after the passage of the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1996 was essentially banned.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Out of 40,000 deaths last year, how many with machine guns?
 
Yeah, Utah, the land of funny underwear. How many school districts do you think have the funds to do those retrofits?
It's cheaper than that new computer lab. Did you know that schools have funding to build WHOLE NEW SCHOOLS?
There are too many bullshit “if/woulds” in your post to even begin to address them.
Argument of the stone.
Try dealing with reality for once.
Canned insult using a meaningless buzzword. You have no idea what 'reality' even means.
 
A SCOTUS decision IS an opinion.
Nope. A SCOTUS decision is a ruling. An opinion is not a ruling.
You can try to play words games but it doesn’t change the ruling/deision/opinion of Heller.
Heller's opinion doesn't count as a ruling either, but he did win his case.
Guns have always been regulated and, for the most part, the courts have upheld those regulations.
They don't have the authority to change the Constitution of the United States.
Your ignorance of law is astounding
Inversion fallacy. The law in question is the Constitution of the United States. ALL other federal laws and most State laws MUST conform to that constitution. State laws must also conform to their own State constitutions, which contain similar wording in many cases about guns.
 
Here is the “ruling”, dumbfuck . Scroll down to page 54. Read it and weep, fool.

It says:

Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.



https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html

Not a ruling. An opinion. It is also wrong. Scalia has no authority to change the Constitution.
 
Thanks for finally admitting that firearms can be restricted.

And take a look here, dumfuck. At the end of Heller. What word jumps out at you?

SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined.

No, they cannot be restricted. I never said they could be.
An opinion is not a ruling.
 
I wonder if domer or Stone can show how many school shootings occurred prior to the "Gun Free Zones" were put into place??

Unless such information would totally destroy their entire rantings and ravings.

They still happened, but were less of a problem then as well.

My high school had a gun club. You brought your gun to school for gun club.
 
How many machine gun deaths have occurred?

What is the gun death rates in western cultures that have strict gun control?

Google Heller yet, lazy dumbass? P54-56:

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.”

An opinion is not a ruling.
 
Since the original intent was in the context of a militia, rather than idiots of your level thinking you can carry any gun, anywhere, anytime, you’re the one ignorant of the original intent.

WRONG. The militia is the method a State has to defend itself. Arms are the method people have the right to defend themselves. The 2nd amendment discusses TWO related rights, not one.
 
You’re an Illiterate fool. You also don’t have a fucking clue whether not having guns at schools has made things worse.

Why do you like to lie so much?

Guns are at schools. How do you think a mass murder at a school occurs? Some schools have gun clubs. Some schools have armed teachers.
 
It's you who has a problem with reality. You just admitted that you don't really care about the children. For you, it's only about more restrictions on guns.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

It's obvious he doesn't care about the children. They are nothing but pawns to him.
 
Back
Top