Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

[Into the Night]

Isn't masturbation a sin?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I suppose it depends on what god you believe in.

 

[StoneByStone]

He didn't. People spoke out against him. No matter how many he killed, people still spoke out against him.

And then he had them shot or worked to death. So the people did not have freedom of speech.

 

[StoneByStone]

Isn't masturbation a sin?

Yup. But Republicans won't come for that, because the anti-abortion laws are actually about keeping people poor, not upholding (((Christianity))).

 

[domer76]

Because it's against the law. It is not, however, a crime. It is an infraction.

So you agree with me. I was saying this all along.

The concept just escapes you, doesn’t it?

Your fellow dumbfuck was the one I was responding to. He was asking what law prevented any crime. You were silent all olong.

 

[Into the Night]

And then he had them shot or worked to death. So the people did not have freedom of speech.

They did. People spoke out against him. No matter how many he killed, people still spoke out against him.

 

[StoneByStone]

They did. People spoke out against him. No matter how many he killed, people still spoke out against him.

That's like saying rape is legal in America because it still happens.

 

[Into the Night]

The concept just escapes you, doesn’t it?

Your fellow dumbfuck was the one I was responding to. He was asking what law prevented any crime. You were silent all olong.

No, I wasn't silent. You are posting to me because I wasn't silent.

Now you are attacking me because you agree with me??? You are attacking him because you are agreeing with him???

Do you even KNOW what you are saying when you write these posts of yours? It seems you have lost context again, this time to support your own Bulverism.

 

[Into the Night]

That's like saying rape is legal in America because it still happens.

Rape isn't right. It's trying to take away someone else's inherent rights by force, same as Stalin.

What is legal and what is an inherent right are unrelated.

 

[StoneByStone]

Rape isn't right. It's trying to take away someone else's inherent rights by force, same as Stalin.

What is legal and what is an inherent right are unrelated.

Splitting hairs. The point is that the government can make things illegal and a piece of paper doesn't stop that.

 

[domer76]

No, I wasn't silent. You are posting to me because I wasn't silent.

Now you are attacking me because you agree with me??? You are attacking him because you are agreeing with him???

Do you even KNOW what you are saying when you write these posts of yours? It seems you have lost context again, this time to support your own Bulverism.

When I was back and forth with Dumbfuck, you were silent.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

And then he had them shot or worked to death. So the people did not have freedom of speech.

Sure they did, Stalin just imposed a consequences; but it didn't stop them from speaking.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

The concept just escapes you, doesn’t it?

Your fellow dumbfuck was the one I was responding to. He was asking what law prevented any crime. You were silent all olong.

Hey dumbfuck, what law has ever PREVENTED a crime??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Splitting hairs. The point is that the government can make things illegal and a piece of paper doesn't stop that.

Making something illegal, doesn't remove the right; because they can still do it.

 

[StoneByStone]

Making something illegal, doesn't remove the right; because they can still do it.

Sure, but what I'm saying is that muh constitution does not keep our rights from becoming illegal. There will always be speech in America, but there might not always be freedom of speech.

 

[Into the Night]

Splitting hairs.

No, they are unrelated.

The point is that the government can make things illegal and a piece of paper doesn't stop that.

A piece of paper does not grant rights either.

 

[Into the Night]

When I was back and forth with Dumbfuck, you were silent.

Since you call everyone dumbfuck, including me, that sentence doesn't even make sense, dumbfuck.

 

[Into the Night]

Sure, but what I'm saying is that muh constitution does not keep our rights from becoming illegal. There will always be speech in America, but there might not always be freedom of speech.

There is always freedom of speech. No government can take that away. We've already been through this. You are just chanting now.

 

[StoneByStone]

There is always freedom of speech. No government can take that away. We've already been through this. You are just chanting now.

#semantics

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Sure, but what I'm saying is that muh constitution does not keep our rights from becoming illegal. There will always be speech in America, but there might not always be freedom of speech.

Untrue; because we will always have the "freedom of speech" and it can't be TAKEN from us.

 

[StoneByStone]

Untrue; because we will always have the "freedom of speech" and it can't be TAKEN from us.

By "freedom of speech," I mean the legal definition. The freedom to say what we want without government oppression such as being arrested.