Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

No arguments, just juvenile insults, as usual. Let me guess. You're about 12, and spend most of your time in Mommy's basement looking for porn on the internet.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

His mommy finds it for him because even she realizes he'll never see the real thing.
 
I didn't say "opinion" stupid fuck.

You fail to answer the question as to which countries provide a right to possess weapons. Why? Because there aren't any, stupid fuck. Maybe one. Honduras? lol

Wrong again, stupid fuck. Tell me about the extreme Muslim world and the female's right to anything.

Wrong again, stupid fuck. The extreme Muslim world says that you, as a no-Muslim don't have a right to life.

You haven't named one universal right that I haven't countered.

I've done my homework, dumbshit. Obviously, you haven't done yours.

Dismissed.

Why did you change to "dumbshit" at the end after using "stupid fuck" throughout most of your response? Just curious... Also curious as to why you are perpetually angry...

Fidget spinners; give 'em a try :)
 
Not a one, stupid fuck.
Quite the opposite, actually. He is correct; you are wrong.

No other countries identify the right to bear arms.
Rights do not come from governments.

And you have failed to list one.
He has responded to you adequately.

Now, you're either ignorant or a liar. I propose both. Failure noted.
False Dichotomy. He could also be correct, you know... ;)

[Edit] Wait, I was wrong.
Yes, you were wrong, but you still don't get why you were wrong...

Two other countries - Mexico and Guatemala have that right.
Yes, and so does every other country.

But with severe restrictions.
Freedom of choice is a right; freedom from the resulting consequences of choices is not.

...holy link ignored on sight...

Not in Muslim countries.
Even in Muslim countries...

Your ignorance is noted. Failure noted.
Inversion.

You have yet to prove a single universal right.
Try to keep up.

Failure noted.
The failure is yours...

You don't know shit about logical fallacies.
He knows them quite well. YOU are the one who doesn't know jack shit about them.

You merely cut and paste your ignorance.
No, he doesn't.

Failure noted.
The failure is yours.

Amazing that you have nothing but a string of lies and failures. Wait. No. Not amazing. Predictable.
You sure like to project your issues onto others, don't you?
 
Why did you change to "dumbshit" at the end after using "stupid fuck" throughout most of your response? Just curious... Also curious as to why you are perpetually angry...

Fidget spinners; give 'em a try :)

I know. You enjoy willfully ignorant dumbfucks
 
Quite the opposite, actually. He is correct; you are wrong.


Rights do not come from governments.


He has responded to you adequately.


False Dichotomy. He could also be correct, you know... ;)


Yes, you were wrong, but you still don't get why you were wrong...


Yes, and so does every other country.


Freedom of choice is a right; freedom from the resulting consequences of choices is not.




Even in Muslim countries...


Inversion.


Try to keep up.


The failure is yours...


He knows them quite well. YOU are the one who doesn't know jack shit about them.


No, he doesn't.


The failure is yours.


You sure like to project your issues onto others, don't you?

Only Mexico and Guatemala have the right to bear arms. Both with severe restrictions. Educate yourself, dumbfuck.

Rights come from governments. You don’t have a right to bear arms if your government didn’t grant it. Look around the world dumbfuck.

Shiw me where any other country has the right to bear arms. Don’t give me the bullshit about posting their laws. Show me the RIGHT.

Identify a universal right.

I’ll wait for your babbling tesponse.
 
Only Mexico and Guatemala have the right to bear arms. Both with severe restrictions. Educate yourself, dumbfuck.
Argument By Repetition.

Rights come from governments.
No, they don't.

You don’t have a right to bear arms if your government didn’t grant it.
Yes, I do.

Look around the world dumbfuck.
This applies around the world, too.

Shiw me where any other country has the right to bear arms.
This has been explained to you already.

Don’t give me the bullshit about posting their laws. Show me the RIGHT.
Already been done.

Identify a universal right.
The right to life.

I’ll wait for your babbling tesponse.
I don't babble.
 
Argument By Repetition.


No, they don't.


Yes, I do.


This applies around the world, too.


This has been explained to you already.


Already been done.


The right to life.


I don't babble.

Idiots of your level need repetition. You fail to understand facts the first several times.

Yeah, they do. Tell me about the right to bear arms in China.

No you don't. Tell me about your right to free speech in Saudi Arabia.

You fail on identifying any country that grants a RIGHT to bear arms.

You have failed to identify any country that has the right to bear arms. I'll wait.

Yeah, Into the Night, you posted laws, not rights.

Extreme Muslims don't recognize your right to life. So, not universal. Another failure.

You continually babble.

Do this, punk. Use one name rather than the two that you post under. Choose Into the Night or this one. Don't try to bullshit us that these responses are coming from two different individuals.
 
Not a one, stupid fuck.
All nations.
No other countries identify the right to bear arms.
And you have failed to list one.
...deleted insults and fallacy fallacy...
All natinos.
[Edit] Wait, I was wrong. Two other countries - Mexico and Guatemala have that right. But with severe restrictions.
All nations.
Not in Muslim countries. Your ignorance is noted. Failure noted.
All nations.
You have yet to prove a single universal right. Failure noted.
I do not have to prove an inherent right. They simply are.
You don't know shit about logical fallacies.
A fallacy is an error in logic, similar to a math error. Logic is a closed functional system, just like mathematics.
You merely cut and paste your ignorance. Failure noted. ...deleted fallacy fallacies and insult fallacies...
Inversion fallacy.
 
By your definition we also have the right to murder, rape, molest children, use drugs because no government can prevent these things.

This has already been address. You do not have the right to curtail others of their rights. Of all of these, the only one you list that is your right at all is the use of drugs. If you want to fuck yourself with drugs, that's your business. I you want to drive under the influence, operate machinery under the influence, fly an aircraft under the influence, drive a ship or a boat under the influence, then it becomes the business of others. Then you are threatening the lives of others.

A right is not a right because a government can or cannot prevent it. You are making a false equivalence.
 
This has already been address. You do not have the right to curtail others of their rights. Of all of these, the only one you list that is your right at all is the use of drugs. If you want to fuck yourself with drugs, that's your business. I you want to drive under the influence, operate machinery under the influence, fly an aircraft under the influence, drive a ship or a boat under the influence, then it becomes the business of others. Then you are threatening the lives of others.

A right is not a right because a government can or cannot prevent it. You are making a false equivalence.

If I have the right of free speech but my nation's government punishes that speech, it is a non-existent right except in the abstract. Only governments which protect that right have it in practice.
 
All nations.

All natinos.

All nations.

All nations.

I do not have to prove an inherent right. They simply are.

A fallacy is an error in logic, similar to a math error. Logic is a closed functional system, just like mathematics.

Inversion fallacy.

3 nations. Mexico, Guatemala, US. Anything else you post is a lie.

"they simply are". What fallacy is that, dumfuck? :rofl2:

Yeah, you've proven that you don't know shit about fallacies. Inversion? Can't find that one. List the reference. Find one of my circular fallacies, liar.

Try this, liar. Post under one identity rather than his your two under two different names. That you post under two proves that you are nothing more than a troll.Choose one gfm7175, and stick with it.
 
You just demonstrate that the U.S. is the only country in the world where the individual has a right to life.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Not quite true. In every nation of the world, one has the right to life, even in a land where others seek to take it from you. You also have the right to defend that life. These rights are inherent, simply because one is alive.

Remember, all men die, therefore all men have a right to life (else you cannot die). How and when that happens is the only difference here. If someone takes an innocent life, does not justice demand compensation from that person, even to forfeiting their own life?
 
Why did you change to "dumbshit" at the end after using "stupid fuck" throughout most of your response? Just curious... Also curious as to why you are perpetually angry...

Fidget spinners; give 'em a try :)

So far I've seen him use 'dumbshit', 'dumbfuck', and 'stupid fuck' about equally with no discernible pattern.
 
Yeah, they do. Tell me about the right to bear arms in China.
Already did.
No you don't. Tell me about your right to free speech in Saudi Arabia.
Already did.
You fail on identifying any country that grants a RIGHT to bear arms.
Already did.
You have failed to identify any country that has the right to bear arms. I'll wait.
Already did.
Yeah, Into the Night, you posted laws, not rights.
No, I posted rights, not laws.
Extreme Muslims don't recognize your right to life. So, not universal. Another failure.
Irrelevant. The right to life is inherent, even in Islamic nations.
You continually babble.
Argument of the stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.
Do this, punk. Use one name rather than the two that you post under. Choose Into the Night or this one. Don't try to bullshit us that these responses are coming from two different individuals.
We are two different individuals. He just happens to understand a lot of logic, same as I do. Logic doesn't change. It's a closed functional system.
 
Back
Top