Questions for Anti-Choice Crowd

Coming from someone who cannot spell “liberal”…I’m less than worried about your thoughts.

He is a parrot speaking repetitive phrases and congratulating himself for "deep thought". He does drive-by posts and thinks he is profound.
 
I love how you lefties try to use the bible to justify your fucked up thinking. If you are correct then explain this passage.

"Exodus 21:22-25 ESV / 64 “When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out, but there is no harm, the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman's husband shall impose on him, and he shall pay as the judges determine. But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.


Sure sounds like the Bible considers the unborn a person.

Actually, not. The miscarriage is only punishable with a fine. But if the woman is harmed, then there are more severe punishments.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
I will admit that I didn’t read much of your post. The foundation is, to be polite, faulty.

Gestation is a scientific term. A child, by definition, has fully gestated. I think the word you’re looking for is “mature”.

Try again please.

Gestation indeed continues from CONCEPTION to adulthood regardless of the child's location. Question since when is a child at any stage MATURE? What? There is no (wink, wink) scientific evidence of continued growth, physically, mentally and emotionally all through the development stages of a child's life?

Gestation: The "conception" and "DEVELOPMENT" of a human life. ;) What? A child stops "developing" once it exits the magical vagina? Really? That must be why there are no laws that regulate parental responsibility of that non developing life....no?

Guess what? You have just presented the quint essential left wing LOGICAL FALLACY. Your false premise......GESTATION or DEVELOPMENT magically ceases to exist once a human child breeches the vagina. You called a developing child....MATURE upon birth? Really? Some SCIENCE ya got there bad hat harry. :palm:

No....a child has not fully GESTATED/DEVELOPED until it reaches adulthood. If that wasn't the case...….you could just pop out a child and it could take care of itself since it was fully GESTATED/DEVELOPED upon completion of the birth cycle. But in reality: Its a crime against humanity to toss a new born alone out into this cruel world. What righteous and moral MOTHER would not willingly offer their own life over the life of any one of their children at any stage of human development.....? Answer: No righteous mother would think of putting her own life above that of her child's life. ABORTION on demand for any reason is the most immoral and evil act to have ever been considered by humanity. Animals even are more righteous than a mother that would kill her own child due to societal projection and shame. Abortion is the ultimate example of the evil that is known as POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.
 
Last edited:
Who would bring an innocent baby into a country that elected Donald Pigfucker Trump?

If you accidentally make an embryo, mercifully get the fuck rid of it before it becomes a person and is exposed to the shit with which we must put up.
That's certainly one way of looking at it.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Coming from someone who cannot spell “liberal”…I’m less than worried about your thoughts.

I know how to spell liberal.......but lib'ruls aren't liberals........people kept pretending "liberal" was a good thing......so I avoid calling the demmycunts liberals.......
 
Gestation indeed continues from CONCEPTION to adulthood regardless of the child's location. Question since when is a child at any stage MATURE? What? There is no (wink, wink) scientific evidence of continued growth, physically, mentally and emotionally all through the development stages of a child's life?

Gestation: The "conception" and "DEVELOPMENT" of a human life. ;) What? A child stops "developing" once it exits the magical vagina? Really? That must be why there are no laws that regulate parental responsibility of that non developing life....no?

Guess what? You have just presented the quint essential left wing LOGICAL FALLACY. Your false premise......GESTATION or DEVELOPMENT magically ceases to exist once a human child breeches the vagina. You called a developing child....MATURE upon birth? Really? Some SCIENCE ya got there bad hat harry. :palm:

No....a child has not fully GESTATED/DEVELOPED until it reaches adulthood. If that wasn't the case...….you could just pop out a child and it could take care of itself since it was fully GESTATED/DEVELOPED upon completion of the birth cycle. But in reality: Its a crime against humanity to toss a new born alone out into this cruel world. What righteous and moral MOTHER would not willingly offer their own life over the life of any one of their children at any stage of human development.....? Answer: No righteous mother would think of putting her own life above that of her child's life. ABORTION on demand for any reason is the most immoral and evil act to have ever been considered by humanity. Animals even are more righteous than a mother that would kill her own child due to societal projection and shame. Abortion is the ultimate example of the evil that is known as POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.


Gestation is a scientific term despite your fantasy to the contrary.

Again, correct yourself and come back when you can understand that simple concept.
 
Gestation is a scientific term despite your fantasy to the contrary.

Again, correct yourself and come back when you can understand that simple concept.

Ralph uses his own definitions for standard terminology. That's how he "wins" arguments. It's the only way he can "win" an argument.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Gestation is a scientific term despite your fantasy to the contrary.

Again, correct yourself and come back when you can understand that simple concept.
Ralph clearly has no idea what he is talking about. Gestation is a medical term for the period from conception to birth. If pro-lifers are so moral, why is it that their concern for the child ends once it's born? And he knows nothing about animals. I had some pet lab rats, one of which ate her babies because she was nervous about all the kids oohing and aahing about them. Which is not unusual for wild animals or even domesticated ones.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk yuh
 
But they, obviously, aren't people yet. Even God didn't think so.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
*‘they are real developing unborn children...and abortion is ‘the decision to end ‘ the development of those very real, unborn tiny people....
Not they are real developing unborn children...and abortion is an end to the development of those very real, unborn tiny people....
a decision that is‘ not "nature's way, or spontaneous"...the bible does refer to a child in the womb...as a... child....
 
Actually, not. The miscarriage is only punishable with a fine. But if the woman is harmed, then there are more severe punishments.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Cute put your own spin on the passage. You know damn the harm is to the children. No other reason to say a woman with child and children come out.
 
Cute put your own spin on the passage. You know damn the harm is to the children. No other reason to say a woman with child and children come out.
You're putting your own spin on the passage. Don't you think that an omnipotent and omniscient God would have phrased that so that there was no possibility of misunderstanding?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You're putting your own spin on the passage. Don't you think that an omnipotent and omniscient God would have phrased that so that there was no possibility of misunderstanding?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Not even to mention that different translations don't even use the words "child" or "children".

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You're putting your own spin on the passage. Don't you think that an omnipotent and omniscient God would have phrased that so that there was no possibility of misunderstanding?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Well maybe if you believed then you would understand the intent of the passage. No law giving book is as explicit as you want. Hell even our Constitution is open to interpretation.
 
Ralph clearly has no idea what he is talking about. Gestation is a medical term for the period from conception to birth. If pro-lifers are so moral, why is it that their concern for the child ends once it's born? And he knows nothing about animals. I had some pet lab rats, one of which ate her babies because she was nervous about all the kids oohing and aahing about them. Which is not unusual for wild animals or even domesticated ones.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk yuh

They care less about the unborn than they do about illegal immigrants from Mexico.

What they don’t like is women having control over their bodies and their corresponding loss of control. That dingbat Laura Ingram admitted as much when she said "“American we know and love doesn’t exist anymore””.
 
Back
Top