RACIST WHITE LIB calls school choice FASCIST - but sends own son to private school

[Text Drivers are Killers]

To graduate from HS we need to insist the kid take the SAT and get 500+ on both sections. Then teachers would have to teach and the kids would have to be able to at least read and do simple arithmetic.

But then 90% of blacks would not graduate.

 

[RB 60]

Private schools should be privately paid for.
The pachys want the taxpayers to provide vouchers for them.
Absolutely absurd.

Public schools are the public's business,
and I personally don't see any hypocrisy
with any public employees or union officials
sending kids to private schools.

Where you work and where you send your kids to school are totally unrelated.

She called others fascist for what she has done herself. That's the point.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

I see it more the way Arizona has gone. The student is what's important here, not the school. The state pays the school to teach the student. Doesn't matter what school, private, charter, public, whatever. What matters is the school is effective in turning out educated graduates.

When you do that, and unions absolutely hate this, it means that teachers and schools have to be efficient and effective at producing results. That's what counts. If public schools turn out a shitty graduate, then they should wither on the vine and go under. If a private school does the same it should go under.

I am absolutely against public education and government having a monopoly on education, and that is exactly what the Left, teacher's unions, and the Democrats want. For them, it's all about the process, and the results are irrelevant.

I obviously agree with none of this and would make school vouchers illegal.

It's not the taxpayers' responsibility to send anybody's kid to a private school,
especially a fakakta right wing Christian school
which harms society far more than it does any good.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

She called others fascist for what she has done herself. That's the point.

No, from what I understand, she objects
to people seeking to send their kids outside of the public school systems
on the taxpayers' dime,

and to non-public schools getting funding that should and must go to public schools.

 

[RB 60]

No, from what I understand, she objects
to people seeking to send their kids outside of the public school systems
on the taxpayers' dime,

and to non-public schools getting funding that should and must go to public schools.

I have no kids. They can send one on my dime (actually, my school taxes are over $2000 a year).