SmarterthanYou
rebel
because it's not accurate. it's full of lies and meaningless conjecture.
Rage on the Right
- Thread starter apple0154
- Start date
because it's not accurate. it's full of lies and meaningless conjecture.
KingCondanomation
New member
Because of overspending, poor setting of interest rates that resulted in people buying homes they could not afford, overregulation, overtaxation, accumulation of debt, programs that encourage people to look to government for job creation rather than their own entrepreneurial spirit which has ALWAYS been that which America excels at.
We became more global in the 80's and 90's and certainly had no problems with jobs then. There were lefties and unions screaming for more protectionism with NAFTA and thinking all jobs will go to Mexico - it never happened.
If protectionism worked so great why didn't Smoot Hawley turn around the unemployment rate rather than double it when it passed?
I can say point blank right now that I would be out of work if we were in a protectionist economy as we have many customers and the newest bigger ones are overseas.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Condom, how can consumption recover when all jobs are sent overseas and the banks have cut the credit flow? Being a "consumer society" is a fucking joke, thats the last stop before bankers destroy you.
Condom, you;re dumber than a shit eating dog.
Condom, you;re dumber than a shit eating dog.
Show the proper respect, he is King Condom of the Nation. Can't you read?
And Dano. Don't get bent over this, it's a joke man.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Im not joking.
He is dumber than a shit eating dog if he thinks the economy can recover when jobs are sent overseas as per globalist idiocy.
KingCondanomation
New member
Ok then if you could kindly explain why the economy DID recover when many clothing manufacturing jobs were set up overseas instead in the 80's?
And who's to say YOU my friend are not really the one trying to throw business overseas!!! Did you think no one would ever find out?
Yes I have solved your riddle!!!
Rearrange the letters in ASSHATZOMBIE and what do we get?!?
AHA BIZ ME TOSS
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Probably some bubble somewhere else was inflated to cover over losses.
It's thirty years later now. Now the wallstreet bubbles cannot cover over the basic flaws in our economy, plus, they all popped and will only be reflated for entities which help further destroy the nation.
KingCondanomation
New member
Okey-dokey, well try another one. In the 90's we lost manufacturing jobs to Mexico, yet once again the economy boomed well in the late 90's.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Okey-dokey, well try another one. In the 90's we lost manufacturing jobs to Mexico, yet once again the economy boomed well in the late 90's.
---- "Sorry dude I cannot help you no more"
This is a result of banks giving loose credit. That's the old reality. They kept us all sedated with cheap easy money while they shipped all the jobs overseas. Now they cut the credit and we're fucked. it's quite simple to see.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Prove it! Because just you saying so coupled with a lot of generalized BS won't cut it. They have documented facts to draw conclusions....what do you have?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Ahhh, but one would have to assume that the parishoners of Wrights church were in mental lock step with EVERY LITERAL WORD HE SAID. Clearly, that is not the case...as Obama and OTHER parishoners explained to the media during the neocon feeding frenzy around Wright. So your comparison falls flat, because last time I checked militias and teabagger rallies are not recognized churches with tax exempt status.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Damn. Obama could butcher children and you would absolve him of guilt.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
KingCondom swallowed my jizz and loved it. What a globalist fool.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
he has the documented facts WITHOUT the drawn conclusions......which makes him the winner.......
One would have to assume that everyone at a "Tea Party" event are in lock step with EVERY LITERAL WORD of the various speakers, or for you guys, anybody holding a sign. That is not the case. The comparison is valid. You are just able to show some reason with Obama that you throw out the window when attempting to smear your opponents.
It has nothing to do with being recognized as a church.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Here are a few paragraphs from an op-ed in today's paper. I think he's nailed it.
"Many of the tea partiers were not involved in politics until prodded by misfortunes attributed to the recession. The newness of their plunge into the fray explains in part the radical nature of their proposals: Get rid of the Fed, the income tax, Social Security, not to mention bailouts and stimulus bills, even Medicare (a government program on which the government should keep its hands off!).
As for so many in the past, to the tea partiers the world is full of conspiracies, with President Barack Obama the master of them all. He, not even a citizen of the United States, is intent on controlling the Internet, depriving Americans of their guns, killing the economy and so much more.
But take note that a Nevada Republican running for Congress blames both the Democratic and Republican parties for moving the country toward "socialist tyranny." An equal opportunity accuser!
Therein lies a clue.
I would not, with Mr. Barstow, characterize the tea party movement as an expression of "conservative populist discontent." Populist, probably; discontent, surely. But not conservative.
Both Edmund Burke, the father of modern conservatism, and William F. Buckley, his modern, if imperfect, reincarnation, would shudder in their graves to see the tea partiers given the respectable label of "conservative."
Conservatism is a rational position. Paranoia is neither rational nor a position. It is, the dictionary informs us, a derangement, derived from Greek words that translate as "outside the mind."
Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10069/1041416-109.stm#ixzz0hmhsTDl8
SmarterthanYou
rebel
actually being a member. I repeat, the SPLC report if full of unadulterated bullshit and lies.
All I can say is keep marginalizing these "tea-partiers" and see where that gets you. Are there nuts among them....yep, but there are nuts within every organization.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Maybe so. But those who want to be perceived as reasonable protesters don't do the movement any good when they attend rallies with signs like these:
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I think he's full of his own delusional hysteria.
if radical means being fed up with the failure of the federal government, cool. radical it is.
could you get a broader brush?
just like Mr. Barstow, we're not hard core conservative, we're simply Americans fed up with the fiscal failure of the federal government.
good. not only do we want them to shudder in their graves, but we want them to sink to the core of the earth for their 'modern conservative' failure.
like I said, delusional hysteria.