Rand Paul KO’s Fauci in the first round

He is not a dentist, try again. he did not ignore fauci on the variants he correctly posited that there have been 0 reported deaths or hospitalizations from any of the variants. You do not need to lecture me on serotypes, you like Dr. Fauci which paul points out are using conjecture for policy, not science. fact is we do not have proof any of the mutations are jumping the vaccine and no one, again, no one has been hospitalized due to any of the mutations and none of the mutations have shown in clinical studies to be severely resistant to the vaccine.

Really? I guess the morgue isn't the hospital so maybe you are correct, but I doubt it.
A variant identified in the U.K. This COVID-19 variant (B.1.1.7) has 23 mutations. Several of these mutations are in the spikelike S protein that the virus uses to attach itself to the surface of human cells. This variant might be associated with an increased risk of death compared to other variants, but further research is needed.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/expert-answers/covid-variant/faq-20505779

The 28-day risk of death for the B117 COVID-19 variant was 64% higher than for previously circulating strains in people older than 30 years, a UK study finds.
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-per...rate-64-higher-b117-covid-variant-study-finds

For example, out of 1,000 people in their 60s who test positive for the old variant, six of them might be expected to die from COVID-19 in the four weeks following the test. But this rises to about nine with the B.1.1.7 variant.
https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/...r-mortality-compared-other-strains-sars-cov-2
 
Rand Paul is an eye doctor and not an infectious disease expert, so what business does he have to go head to head with Dr Fauci who is???????? Rand Paul is putting politics ahead on medical science for his political gain. So why is that so hard for you to understand????? Do you have a comprehension problem??????????



So you don't think that an MD understands basic virology?


I will ask you again, what was Dr. Paul wrong about vs Dr. Fauci?


One of you should be able to answer.
 



This is in the UK, and you forgot to highlight "might" and "further research needed. Rand was correctly talking about the US. Do you have any data on the US and this variant?
 
Rand Paul is an eye doctor and not an infectious disease expert, so what business does he have to go head to head with Dr Fauci who is???????? Rand Paul is putting politics ahead on medical science for his political gain. So why is that so hard for you to understand????? Do you have a comprehension problem??????????

He's a doctor who's treated patients and he's a United States Senator questioning a federal employee.

Is Fauci supposed to be infallible?

Dr-Anthony-Fauci-Saint-Celebrity-Prayer-Candle-1_540x.jpg
 
So you don't think that an MD understands basic virology?


I will ask you again, what was Dr. Paul wrong about vs Dr. Fauci?


One of you should be able to answer.

Rand Paul is a dirt bag that is full of shit, if I've got to put it in such a way that you feeble mind can understand.
 
Ahh I rebutted that, thanks. that really doesnt address what he was wrong about and I already answered you here;
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...auci-in-the-first-round&p=4311779#post4311779


He's a medical doctor, not a dentist, you were wrong about that. and the fear of variants being resistant to the vaccine has not been medically proven yet, all virus's mutate, right now, some variants show minimal resistance to any of the vaccines. and Dr. Paul, MD, is correct when he points out fauci is suggesting mitigation by conjecture not science.


Many of us in the medical community know this, it's simply just not the PC viewpoint that follows the agenda.

No, actually you refuted nothing just as Paul did not, just because it has not been shown yet does not mean that another strain cannot infect a vaccinated person, in fact history has proven time and time again that it can and does happen. He is ignoring the fact that the new strains are just getting a foothold so yes the data is not there yet so one bases their actions on the most probable scenario and what the history of viruses and how they mutate and re-infect people. If you are in the medical profession you should already know that or you are simply ignoring that fact, I would suggest it is the later.
 
Rand Paul is a dirt bag that is full of shit, if I've got to put it in such a way that you feeble mind can understand.




I feel like I am trying to have a rational mature scientific discussion here, I feel like you are not.


calling paul a dirtbag and proclaiming he is full of shit does not answer my question.
 

That was brutal.

Rand Paul would be a solid VP pick.

Rand Paul is a loon? After that dickhead had covid, he said that he doesn't need a face mask after having coronavirus[FONT=Roboto, arial, sans-serif], despite experts warnings? Rand Paul claimed he had immunity?!! This asshole also went for a dip in the senate pool with covid too?!! Rand Paul has not creditability and it go's to show you, anyone can be a senator in the U.S. too?!!

[/FONT]
cjones03272020.jpg
 
Rand Paul KO’s Fauci in the first round
Rand Paul Gets Schooled On Coronavirus Variants After Calling Fauci’s Masks ‘Theater’
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fauc...rus-variants-risks_n_605394cac5b6e32eb4b02fcc

I suppose it partially depends on which side you want to believe.

But here is a question, why do you want to believe we can defeat this with zero effort? It is such a minor effort, for such a huge reward, and you refuse to even consider it.

Lets take a look at Paul. Paul was the first member of the Senate to get Covid-19. He promised his doctor that he would quarantine himself for two weeks, but said he felt good, so went out and infected a dozen other people. In his defense, he argued that the school kids he gave the tour to were unlikely to die... but their teacher nearly did die.

This is the type of person Paul is. He thinks quarantining is only for treating symptoms. If it would not be comfortable to him to work, he will not work. If he is contagious, and could kill people, he sees no reason to take time away from work.
 
“Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.

This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks.

This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety.

Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
 
No, actually you refuted nothing just as Paul did not, just because it has not been shown yet does not mean that another strain cannot infect a vaccinated person, in fact history has proven time and time again that it can and does happen. He is ignoring the fact that the new strains are just getting a foothold so yes the data is not there yet so one bases their actions on the most probable scenario and what the history of viruses and how they mutate and re-infect people. If you are in the medical profession you should already know that or you are simply ignoring that fact, I would suggest it is the later.



so the "new strain" that was mentioned here the b117 or the uk strain is not resistant to the current vaccine. yet is paul's point, thats not science that conjecture.
 
Rand Paul is a loon? After that dickhead had covid, he said that he doesn't need a face mask after having coronavirus[FONT=Roboto, arial, sans-serif], despite experts warnings? Rand Paul claimed he had immunity?!! This asshole also went for a dip in the senate pool with covid too?!! Rand Paul has not creditability and it go's to show you, anyone can be a senator in the U.S. too?!!

[/FONT]
cjones03272020.jpg





yes, if you have had the virus and show antibodies over a certain titer level, you are as good or better than had you never had it and had the vaccine as any 1st year medical student learns.
 
Apparently, your just not smart enough to understand anything.

Apparently, you're just not smart enough to present anything credible. You're also just not smart enough to know the difference between "your" and you're", cum dumpster.

Maybe this will help:

 
All this character assassination yet you can't answer my simple question, what was he wrong about in regards to his conversation with fauci? I dont care what "nick swift" thinks about rand paul.

Has nothing to do with what they think it has to do with Paul and his actual credentials, and I am positive you did not read it, I could post more but I am sure you would not read those either.

Looks like you simply will not believe anything anyone explains to you, your mind is closed to anything that does not support Paul, your choice and does not change the fact that Paul is playing politics and Dr. Fauci has science on his side.

Have a Great Friday
 
Back
Top