Rand Paul report on inflation, it's going to get worse!

You made the accusation, apparently without proof.

So you accused me of altering 8 posts, but you can't prove that.

But I can accuse YOU of altering posts, and I can do it with proof:

Last edited by McRocket; Today at 10:29 AM.

So now are you going to take back that lie you said about me?

After all, you're the one changing your posts 4 hours after the fact, according to the record.

I must admit.
I am starting to wonder since the original links NOW DO work.
Perhaps when they are copy and pasted - they no longer work.

But I saw with my own eyes that you changed several posts.
And then appeared to change them back.
But, I cannot prove it one way or another.

If my assumptions were wrong?
I sincerely apologize.

If they were not?
I do not.

Sorry pal...that is as good as it is gonna get from me on that.

NOW I am done with this.



Back to the questions that you are (apparently) too afraid to answer:

Here he is again folks...afraid to answer the simplest of questions.
For the EIGHTH TIME.

Here they are again:

1) So you are actually saying that if someone says 'I don't care if you believe me'?

That automatically means they must be lying?

Yes or no, please?


2) https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...09#post4904709

From above - 'That is NOT 'precisely' (word-for-word) what I typed.

Once again...where did Powell say 'precisely' what I did.
Precisely means 'exactly'.

So...can you post a link to prove that Powell said 'PRECISELY/word-for-word' what I typed'?
Yes or no, please?


3) you said:
'Nice to know you will never hold yourself to any standard on JPP or elsewhere.'
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...38#post4904838

(i) Where is your link to unbiased, factual proof of this?
(ii)Or did you just make it up?

(i) or (ii)?


4) Really?
You KNOW this?
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...91#post4904891

Can you post a link that proves that I have posted on this site before December of 2021?

Yes or no, please?


5) Your post - 'What is 100% clear is McRocket has no fucking clue what he's talking about.

Stimulus didn't cause inflation, the pandemic did because of the havoc it wreaked on supply chains and shipping containers.

McRocket is a partisan hack who wants to blame all his poor decisions and instincts on Joe Biden'.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...09#post4904909

a) where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that I have 'no fucking clue what I am talking about'?
b) Where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that 'stimulus did not cause inflation'?
c) where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that I am a 'partisan hack...blame Joe Biden'?


6) 'No, Powell didn't say the words YOU CLAIM HE DID.'
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...07#post4904907

And where EXACTLY did I claim that Powell said an EXACT statement that I attributed to him...that he did - in fact - not say?


7) ' This isn't my first rodeo and you're not half as clever as you think you are.'
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...19#post4904919

And where is the post I made that stated how clever I think I am?


8) 'You said at the start that supply-side issues weren't the cause of inflation,'
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...77#post4904877

Where EXACTLY did I type that 'supply-side issues were not the cause of inflation?

I said they are not - at present - the principle cause.
I said nowhere that there nothing to do with inflation.

So...where did I type what you are accusing me of typing?
Pol Pot.
 
I must admit.
I am starting to wonder since the original links DO work.
Perhaps when they are copy and pasted - they no longer work.

The links work perfectly fine for me, particularly this one that you altered 4 hours after the fact:

Wrong, actually.

The Fed says that the current inflation is no longer 'transitory'.

https://nypost.com/2021/11/30/jerome-powell-its-time-to-retire-term-transitory-inflation/


Have a nice day.

Last edited by McRocket; Today at 10:29 AM.

So why did you alter that post 4 hours after you posted it?

And why did you accuse me of altering posts when you did, and it's on the record?
 
But I saw with my own eyes that you changed several posts.

Well, I don't know what to tell you other than maybe you need glasses or a swift kick to the head.

It's not surprising that you imagine I changed my posts when you sloppily rushed through a post that included a link you didn't bother to read beyond the headline, and then you altered that post 4 hours later.

So maybe your eyes aren't playing tricks on you...maybe you're just a fucking moron?

Have you considered that possibility? You should.
 
If my admittance of a mistake is not good enough for you...for some bizarre reason.
Tough.
I am done with you on it.

Now...

Here is what I typed that you quoted.

'What I meant was that the inflation causes are now mostly NOT being caused by supply-side problems due to economic recovery from the Covid Depression.
But due to systemic weaknesses brought on by government lockdowns/Covid-19 meddling all over the world.'


So...you are claiming that I said that 'inflation is NOT being caused by supply-side problems'?

True or false?

ROFLMAO. So, because I quoted you exactly before I made my statement, you are unable to infer "mostly" in my statement? And then you proceed to not deal with the rest of my post which makes a clear argument where "generally" as used by Powell would be considered a synonym for "mostly".


While people of above average intelligence will often use diversion to run away from an argument they are losing hoping that others won't notice, smarter people tend to either make better arguments or admit their mistakes in logic and comprehension. So which are you? You've admitted some mistakes but are desperately trying to divert attention from others.
 
The links work perfectly fine for me, particularly this one that you altered 4 hours after the fact:



So why did you alter that post 4 hours after you posted it?

And why did you accuse me of altering posts when you did, and it's on the record?

Since you refuse to answer those SIMPLE questions?

I will have to start with other questions...and watch you ignore those ones.

1) do you have links to unbiased, factual proof that inflation is presently transitory?

Even though even the Fed no longer claims it is?

2) do you wish people offline that they will die a horrible death if they disagree with you politically?

Yes or no?
 
Since you refuse to answer those SIMPLE questions?

This goes back to your first post on this thread...a post that was incorrect, and that was altered by you four hours after originally posting.

Then you accuse me of altering 8 posts, when the record on this thread shows you to be the one altering posts.

So why did you do that? Is it because you're a fucking moron? That's what I believe.
 
ROFLMAO. So, because I quoted you exactly before I made my statement, you are unable to infer "mostly" in my statement? And then you proceed to not deal with the rest of my post which makes a clear argument where "generally" as used by Powell would be considered a synonym for "mostly".


While people of above average intelligence will often use diversion to run away from an argument they are losing hoping that others won't notice, smarter people tend to either make better arguments or admit their mistakes in logic and comprehension. So which are you? You've admitted some mistakes but are desperately trying to divert attention from others.

Funny how you switch your position on this when the shoe is on the other foot.

Once again...

Here is what I typed that you quoted.

'What I meant was that the inflation causes are now mostly NOT being caused by supply-side problems due to economic recovery from the Covid Depression.
But due to systemic weaknesses brought on by government lockdowns/Covid-19 meddling all over the world.'

So...you are claiming that I said that 'inflation is NOT being caused by supply-side problems'?

True or false?
 
2) do you wish people offline that they will die a horrible death if they disagree with you politically?

Well, for starters, I wear a mask everywhere I go now so people can't see me frowning at them for being disgusting pigs.

But yeah, if some jackass like you came along and started spreading your COVID everywhere, I'd probably wish you fucking dead to your face.
 
'What I meant was that the inflation causes are now mostly NOT being caused by supply-side problems due to economic recovery from the Covid Depression.
But due to systemic weaknesses brought on by government lockdowns/Covid-19 meddling all over the world.'

OK, but that's not what The Fed said.

Explicitly, it's not what Jerome Powell said.

Even your NY Post link says Powell blamed it on supply-side backlogs.
 
You are right...you are (apparently) not LV.
So I read none of that.

Now where are your answers to my questions of you?


At this point your silly attempts at deflection are just boring. You started out with such promise and then proceeded to prove you were an intellectual lightweight determined to prove you were a troll by spamming repeatedly with your weak diversions.
 
Yes, from Jerome Powell in the link you provided, dipshit:

"Despite his attempt to blame high prices on supply chain backlogs"

Wow.

See, when you don't read your own links, this is what ends up happening.

1) Soooo...you are claiming that Powell is saying that inflation is 'transitory'?

Yet the title of the article you link to is 'Jerome Powell suggests it’s time to stop describing inflation as ‘transitory’'

You realize you are COMPLETELY contradicting yourself?

You are thusly saying that inflation is NOT transitory.
Great!!!

Glad we can agree on SOMETHING.


2) So you do wish people to come to a painful death solely on the basis of political differences?

Good to know.

Well..at least you are not a hypocritical nutcase.

Thanks.
 
At this point your silly attempts at deflection are just boring. You started out with such promise and then proceeded to prove you were an intellectual lightweight determined to prove you were a troll by spamming repeatedly with your weak diversions.

So...instead of answering my questions?

You throw ad hominems and strawman?

Noted.

Another troll on the board...nice to meet you troll # 37.
 
OK, but that's not what The Fed said.

Explicitly, it's not what Jerome Powell said.

Even your NY Post link says Powell blamed it on supply-side backlogs.

I am no longer going to answer your questions when you partially quote a post of mine.
It takes too much effort to go and find the original post you quoted from.

I might still ask you questions.
But I will NOT answer yours unless you include the ENTIRE post you are quoting.
Or I am REAALLLLLY bored.

The choice is yours, Pol Pot.

Have a nice day, Pol.
 
Last edited:
Funny how you switch your position on this when the shoe is on the other foot.

Once again...

Here is what I typed that you quoted.

'What I meant was that the inflation causes are now mostly NOT being caused by supply-side problems due to economic recovery from the Covid Depression.
But due to systemic weaknesses brought on by government lockdowns/Covid-19 meddling all over the world.'

So...you are claiming that I said that 'inflation is NOT being caused by supply-side problems'?

True or false?

I didn't change my position on anything. What part of my position on the meaning of the word "generally" do you need clarified? I'm always happy to help out someone with reading problems. Were there specific words you didn't understand? You don't have to get defensive just because you didn't understand something. We all needed to learn things before we understood them.

Powell said that was inflation was generally being caused by supply side issues.
 
I didn't change my position on anything. What part of my position on the meaning of the word "generally" do you need clarified? I'm always happy to help out someone with reading problems. Were there specific words you didn't understand? You don't have to get defensive just because you didn't understand something. We all needed to learn things before we understood them.

Powell said that was inflation was generally being caused by supply side issues.

:laugh:

I am not being 'defensive'...I am just trying to get you to answer an INCREDIBLY, simple question.
Which you seem to be having an INCREDIBLE amount of difficulty doing.


Once again...

Here is what I typed that you quoted.

'What I meant was that the inflation causes are now mostly NOT being caused by supply-side problems due to economic recovery from the Covid Depression.
But due to systemic weaknesses brought on by government lockdowns/Covid-19 meddling all over the world.'


So...you are claiming that I said that 'inflation is NOT being caused by supply-side problems'?

True or false?
 
1) Soooo...you are claiming that Powell is saying that inflation is 'transitory'?

Yes, as your link says, he blamed it on supply-side issues.

'Jerome Powell suggests it’s time to stop describing inflation as ‘transitory’'

Right, because people like you have no fucking idea what they're talking about.

So you're trying to make hay over semantics, when the thrust of your argument, that inflation isn't caused by supply-chain issues right now, IS COMPLETELY FALSE.
 
2) So you do wish people to come to a painful death solely on the basis of political differences?

Yep, I wish all Nazis would die a horrible, horrible death.

And I think it's weird that you don't also share that wish.

Is that because you're a Nazi sympathizer, or is it because you're just a fucking moron?
 
Back
Top