I didn't use an ad hominem since I didn't say you were wrong because you were an intellectual lightweight. I said you were an intellectual lightweight because instead of arguing the topic you attempt to change it. I have already laid out the case for why you were wrong and you have refused to answer my argument with one of your own. I see no reason to fall for your silly Jr High debate tactics and yet here we are no longer talking about your misstatements on inflation as opposed to one sentence of mine which you insist on taking out of context to try to create an error out of something that a reasonable English speaker would have inferred based on the rest of the post. Whether the word "mostly" is in one sentence or not doesn't change the fact that meaning of "generally" is synonymous with "mostly" which was the actual argument being made and is the argument you are avoiding for some reason.
I didn't use a strawman since that requires that I misstate your position and then proceed to argue against this manufactured opinion. Nowhere in the quoted post did I claim you held a position on anything we had been discussing and since I never claimed you held a certain position I certainly never argued against that position.
You must have been a wiz with stacking blocks when you were in kindergarten. You clearly don't have the logic and language skills to support the claims I've seen you make here. Based on your spatial skills maybe you should take up knitting as a hobby instead of your current one of attempting to troll on the internet. I'll bet you would be great at purl 2.
