Reality check on electric cars

415.jpeg
 

Housing cost a lot along the coast in California, because land is limited, and demand is high. That is not the parts where land is limited, and demand is high. You can almost certainly get that house for almost nothing... Unless there is some sort of mineral production possible.
 
Housing cost a lot along the coast in California, because land is limited, and demand is high. That is not the parts where land is limited, and demand is high. You can almost certainly get that house for almost nothing... Unless there is some sort of mineral production possible.

No, the major issue in California is land is limited because government limits it. Housing is expensive because taxes and regulations on homes drive the price up. Demand isn't particularly high because people are leaving California in droves.
 
No, the major issue in California is land is limited because government limits it. Housing is expensive because taxes and regulations on homes drive the price up. Demand isn't particularly high because people are leaving California in droves.

There is one small kernel of truth in what you are saying, but mostly it is garbage. Land in the interior of California is almost free to anyone who wants it. It is some of the cheapest land in America. No one wants it because of the lack of water, and the fact no one wants to live there. The land along the coast is limited because it is limited. A huge number of people want to live there, but it is limited.

Now for the kernel of truth. Constructing large/tall buildings along many parts of the coast is very difficult because of limitations put in by the government. Land is not what is being limited by the government, but rather floors. This is driving up the cost to live in some of the most productive parts of America, and forcing Americans to live in less productive places. It is really hurting the economy.
 
There is one small kernel of truth in what you are saying, but mostly it is garbage. Land in the interior of California is almost free to anyone who wants it. It is some of the cheapest land in America. No one wants it because of the lack of water, and the fact no one wants to live there. The land along the coast is limited because it is limited. A huge number of people want to live there, but it is limited.

Now for the kernel of truth. Constructing large/tall buildings along many parts of the coast is very difficult because of limitations put in by the government. Land is not what is being limited by the government, but rather floors. This is driving up the cost to live in some of the most productive parts of America, and forcing Americans to live in less productive places. It is really hurting the economy.

Land is too limited along the coast. The California Coastal Commission is the major reason why. The CCC doesn't want you to build ANYTHING on your land and sure as hell isn't about to let anyone buy public land. It can take over a decade to wade through their hearings to do the simplest thing if you live within their jurisdiction.

Of recent, the CCC killed off plans for a large desalination plant that might have eased California's water shortage. They didn't like the idea of a big industrial plant on the coast.

California Coastal Commission Rejects Huntington Beach Desalination Plant Proposal
https://californiaglobe.com/article...n,freshwater to combat a drought in the state.

Coastal Commission bans new dwelling units in Cambria, Los Osos
https://calcoasttimes.com/2022/02/1...e opportunities for people in need of housing.

California Coastal Commission (Finally) Bans ORVs
https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/25/california-coastal-commission-bans-orvs/

Ban on Short-Term Rentals Required Coastal Commission Approval
https://www.californialandusedevelo...rentals-required-coastal-commission-approval/

The CCC is largely composed of radical Leftist environmentalists who seemingly have no other purpose but to say NO! to any and all development along California's coastal region.
 
Tesla under investigation on claim it throttled batteries to hide fire risk
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/04/tes...nvestigation-by-us-traffic-safety-agency.html

Tesla Fires Are Notoriously Hard to Put out Due to Their Batteries
https://www.motorbiscuit.com/tesla-fires-notoriously-hard-put-due-batteries/

NTSB-Warns-Of-Safety-Risks-From-EV-Battery-Fires-1.jpg


Seems that Tesla isn't the only "Pinto" on the market...

Tesla updates its cars in wake of Shanghai battery fire
Tesla's main competition in China, Nio, is recalling its cars as well
https://driving.ca/auto-news/news/tesla-updates-its-cars-in-wake-of-shanghai-battery-fire
 

I said from the beginning that electric car batteries posed a risk to first responders.

The Pinto got a bad rap, just like the Corvair did.
I had a Pinto SW. Beat the piss out of it and the
drivetrain was intact when I sold it for $50 to a
friend who turned it into a dog coop. Good times...
 
Here's a new reality check on Tesla as a POS company...

Canadian Tesla owner says automaker locked him out of his car until he pays $26,000 for new battery
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...pc=U531&cvid=bc63dc8dde8a4fdc8439c18487e8aebe

This article is rife with horror stories by Tesla owners of being totally kicked to the curb by the company...

Some Tesla owners have voiced concerns about the vehicle in recent months. A group of owners in Norway went on a hunger strike in August in an effort to get CEO Elon Musk’s attention about a long series of problems they claim to have with their vehicles.
 
Back
Top