Refugee status requested
- Thread starter countryboy
- Start date
Soon you will understand the reason for thread banning.....the retard above is reason Numero UNO!
True.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Don't answer her, all you'll get is her usual bollocks about Austrian School, short bus, no maths blah blah.
I'll bet she says I don't know anything about math, either. I've only been a machinist for 40 years.
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
I'll bet she says I don't know anything about math, either. I've only been a machinist for 40 years.
Only 40 years? RB I never realized how young you are!
But on the serious side my step farther was a master machinist and some of the things he made are sitting on the moon. I always thought that was pretty cool.
Only 40 years? RB I never realized how young you are!
But on the serious side my step farther was a master machinist and some of the things he made are sitting on the moon. I always thought that was pretty cool.
Hopefully, you'll never need use of a few of the parts I've made. They went in heart and lung machines.
countryboy
Verified User
Federal tax cuts almost always coincide with increased revenues.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Sadly, that won't be the case.
It was sarcasm. Not that any of us knew that, right?
ETA; But he did say a coherent thought, and that won't be the case...
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Don't liberals deny it?
Русский агент
Путин - мl
It was sarcasm. Not that any of us knew that, right?
Right.
evince
Truthmatters
link to the facts to prove that meme fool
evince
Truthmatters
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog.../29/economists-agree-tax-cuts-cost-revenue---
There's an old joke that if you laid all the economists in the world end to end, they wouldn't reach a conclusion. Well, not quite. A panel of prominent economists recently came to a decisive conclusion: Despite a widely held notion to the contrary in powerful circles, tax cuts cost revenue.*
First, let's be clear that we're not talking about a biased group of economists.*The IGM economic experts panel, run by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, was created to explore the extent to which economists agree or disagree on major public policy issues, and it includes Democrats, Republicans, and independents as well as older and younger scholars. The panel is surveyed regularly, each time on a different topic.
When asked recently about the proposition, "A cut in federal income tax rates in the U.S. right now would raise taxable income enough so that the annual total tax revenue would be higher within five years than without the tax cut," none of the panel's 40 economists agreed.*When responses were weighted by the confidence respondents expressed in their answers, 96 percent disagreed and 4 percent were uncertain.
There's an old joke that if you laid all the economists in the world end to end, they wouldn't reach a conclusion. Well, not quite. A panel of prominent economists recently came to a decisive conclusion: Despite a widely held notion to the contrary in powerful circles, tax cuts cost revenue.*
First, let's be clear that we're not talking about a biased group of economists.*The IGM economic experts panel, run by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, was created to explore the extent to which economists agree or disagree on major public policy issues, and it includes Democrats, Republicans, and independents as well as older and younger scholars. The panel is surveyed regularly, each time on a different topic.
When asked recently about the proposition, "A cut in federal income tax rates in the U.S. right now would raise taxable income enough so that the annual total tax revenue would be higher within five years than without the tax cut," none of the panel's 40 economists agreed.*When responses were weighted by the confidence respondents expressed in their answers, 96 percent disagreed and 4 percent were uncertain.