Refugee status requested

evince said:
https://www.usnews.com/[B]opinion[/.../29/economists-agree-tax-cuts-cost-revenue--- There's an old joke that if you laid all the economists in the world end to end, they wouldn't reach a conclusion. Well, not quite. A panel of prominent economists recently came to a decisive conclusion: Despite a widely held notion to the contrary in powerful circles, tax cuts cost revenue.*
First, let's be clear that we're not talking about a biased group of economists.*The IGM economic experts panel, run by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, was created to explore the extent to which economists agree or disagree on major public policy issues, and it includes Democrats, Republicans, and independents as well as older and younger scholars. The panel is surveyed regularly, each time on a different topic.When asked recently about the proposition, "A cut in federal income tax rates in the U.S. right now would raise taxable income enough so that the annual total tax revenue would be higher within five years than without the tax cut," none of the panel's 40 economists agreed.*When responses were weighted by the confidence respondents expressed in their answers, 96 percent disagreed and 4 percent were uncertain.
Click to expand...


Opinion.

Not facts, skank.
 
evince said:
the IGM surveys make clear, politicians who argue that spending increases always have to be offset but that tax cuts never do are arguing a position that flies in the face of the best economic thinking.
Click to expand...

So you say, skank.

You also deny being a rayciss, yet these are indisputably your posts:

evince said:
I spit in the face of the black guy.
Click to expand...

evince said:
Obama was nothing more than another black failure in a government job and another black family in government housing. Stupid nigger.
Click to expand...

evince said:
If you're black and you vote democrat, then you're a "nigger". If you're white and you vote democrat, then you're "white trash". If you're Asian and you vote democrat, then you're a "zipper head". If you're Hispanic and you vote democrat, then you're a "wetback".
Click to expand...
 
The IGM economic experts panel, run by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, was created to explore the extent to which economists agree or disagree on major public policy issues, and it includes Democrats, Republicans, and independents as well as older and younger scholars. The panel is surveyed regularly, each time on a different topic


an unbiased study of economic professionals
 
see they will merely deny ANY facts you give them that proves they have been mind fucked by the republican party
 
evince said:
The IGM economic experts panel, run by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, was created to explore the extent to which economists agree or disagree on major public policy issues, and it includes Democrats, Republicans, and independents as well as older and younger scholars. The panel is surveyed regularly, each time on a different topic an unbiased study of economic professionals
Click to expand...

So you say, rayciss.

You also say you aren't a rayciss, but you are.

It's a fact.

You posted these:

evince said:
I spit in the face of the black guy.
Click to expand...

evince said:
Obama was nothing more than another black failure in a government job and another black family in government housing. Stupid nigger.
Click to expand...

evince said:
If you're black and you vote democrat, then you're a "nigger". If you're white and you vote democrat, then you're "white trash". If you're Asian and you vote democrat, then you're a "zipper head". If you're Hispanic and you vote democrat, then you're a "wetback".
Click to expand...

We don't let a proven rayciss like you define raycism, skank.
 
evince said:
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog.../29/economists-agree-tax-cuts-cost-revenue---



There's an old joke that if you laid all the economists in the world end to end, they wouldn't reach a conclusion. Well, not quite. A panel of prominent economists recently came to a decisive conclusion: Despite a widely held notion to the contrary in powerful circles, tax cuts cost revenue.*
First, let's be clear that we're not talking about a biased group of economists.*The IGM economic experts panel, run by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, was created to explore the extent to which economists agree or disagree on major public policy issues, and it includes Democrats, Republicans, and independents as well as older and younger scholars. The panel is surveyed regularly, each time on a different topic.
When asked recently about the proposition, "A cut in federal income tax rates in the U.S. right now would raise taxable income enough so that the annual total tax revenue would be higher within five years than without the tax cut," none of the panel's 40 economists agreed.*When responses were weighted by the confidence respondents expressed in their answers, 96 percent disagreed and 4 percent were uncertain.
Click to expand...

there is a reason libertarians dont like to mix math into economics like every other school of economics does


the math proves they are insane in their theortes
 
evince said:
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog.../29/economists-agree-tax-cuts-cost-revenue---

There's an old joke that if you laid all the economists in the world end to end, they wouldn't reach a conclusion. Well, not quite. A panel of prominent economists recently came to a decisive conclusion: Despite a widely held notion to the contrary in powerful circles, tax cuts cost revenue.*
First, let's be clear that we're not talking about a biased group of economists.*The IGM economic experts panel, run by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, was created to explore the extent to which economists agree or disagree on major public policy issues, and it includes Democrats, Republicans, and independents as well as older and younger scholars. The panel is surveyed regularly, each time on a different topic.
When asked recently about the proposition, "A cut in federal income tax rates in the U.S. right now would raise taxable income enough so that the annual total tax revenue would be higher within five years than without the tax cut," none of the panel's 40 economists agreed.*When responses were weighted by the confidence respondents expressed in their answers, 96 percent disagreed and 4 percent were uncertain.
Click to expand...

Dear idiot; rather than using OPINION pieces, why not just pull up the Federal Government budget reports that have every year posted and the revenues for that year. You will see that after every tax reduction, there was a corresponding increase in revenues. What you will also see is that SPENDING grew at a HIGHER rate than the revenues coming in.

Only brain dead lying leftist morons think that we have a REVENUE problem in this country. It is equally stupid and moronic to presume that the Government is more entitled to our wages than we are....OR....that corporations pay taxes.

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/federal-receipt-and-outlay-summary
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top