Refute this!

See how he is? Can't answer, just tosses his sippy cup onto the floor again so someone will pick it up for him so he can throw it yet again.

I don't think I tried to deflect or insult him. I guess I will just leave his sippy cup on the floor.
 
You're comparing apples and oranges. One is fossilized. The other was simply frozen. It could not have lasted 65 million years. It's impossible.

Pffffffffffffffffffffffffffft, you're a scientist aren't you, we can tell.

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ........
 
Here it is. More proof that dinosaur fossils are not nearly as old as scientists claim.
https://www.genesispark.com/exhibit.../old-bone/frozen-unfossilized-dinosaur-bones/

What a lie. Someone should report this genesispark site for spreading false information.

Fossils from a unique plant eating dinosaur found in the high Arctic of Alaska may change how scientists view dinosaur physiology, Alaska and Florida university researchers have said.
A paper published on Tuesday concluded that fossilized bones found along Alaska’s Colville river were from a distinct species of hadrosaur, a duck-billed dinosaur not connected to hadrosaurs previously identified in Canada and the Lower 48 states.

It’s the fourth species unique to northern Alaska. It supports a theory of Arctic-adapted dinosaurs that lived 69m years ago in temperatures far cooler than the tropical or equatorial temperatures most people associate with dinosaurs, said Gregory Erickson, professor of biological science at Florida State university...

...Most of the fossils were found in the Liscomb Bone Bed more than 300 miles (480 kilometers) northwest of Fairbanks and a little more than 100 miles (160 km) south of the Arctic Ocean. The bed is named for geologist Robert Liscomb, who found the first dinosaur bones in Alaska in 1961 while mapping for Shell Oil Co.

Liscomb thought they came from mammals. They remained in storage for about two decades until someone identified the fossils as dinosaur bones, said Pat Druckenmiller, earth sciences curator at the University of Alaska Museum.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...-billed-plant-eating-dinosaur-found-in-alaska
 
Pffffffffffffffffffffffffffft, you're a scientist aren't you, we can tell.

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ........

Did you even read the article? The bone they found wasn't fossilized. It was frozen. There is no way a frozen bone can last 65 million. Damn! You are just plain retarded
 
You're comparing apples and oranges. One is fossilized. The other was simply frozen. It could not have lasted 65 million years. It's impossible.


New research, headed by Mary Schweitzer, a molecular paleontologist at North Carolina State University, explains how proteins — and possibly even DNA — can survive millennia. iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay.

https://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html

You are wrong.

EOS.
 
Back
Top