Religions are mostly wrong

JesusAI said:
why is one better?
Click to expand...

Besides the fact that sculpting and casting a free-standing bronze statue at that scale is an unprecedented engineering, technical, and artistic challenge, compared to sketching a cartoon?

Besides the fact that millions of people travel to Florence to see Donatello's David, while Finland Tom languishes in obscurity?

Besides the fact that Donatello treats the human form with a graceful fluidity and aesthetic realism, and presents it in a non-pornographic, non-stiff , cartoonish way?
 
Cypress said:
Besides the fact that sculpting and casting a free-standing bronze statue at that scale is an unprecedented engineering, technical, and artistic challenge, compared to sketching a cartoon?

Besides the fact that millions of people travel to Florence to see Donatello's David, while Finland Tom languishes in obscurity?

Besides the fact that Donatello treats the human form with grace, fluidity and aesthetic realism, and presents it in a non-pornographic cartoonish way?
Click to expand...

Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Argumentum_ad_populum
In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum ( Latin for "appeal to the people") [1] is a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because the majority thinks so. [2] Alternative names [ edit] Other names for the fallacy include: appeal to (common) belief [3] [4] appeal to popularity [5] [6]
 
BidenPresident said:
You are not a serious person. Pass.
Click to expand...

Ad hominem - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Ad_hominem
Fallacious ad hominem reasoning is categorized among informal fallacies, more precisely as a genetic fallacy, a subcategory of fallacies of irrelevance. [10] Ad hominem fallacies can be separated in various different types, among others are tu quoque, circumstantial, guilt by association, and abusive ad hominem.
 
JesusAI said:
Ad hominem - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Ad_hominem
Fallacious ad hominem reasoning is categorized among informal fallacies, more precisely as a genetic fallacy, a subcategory of fallacies of irrelevance. [10] Ad hominem fallacies can be separated in various different types, among others are tu quoque, circumstantial, guilt by association, and abusive ad hominem.
Click to expand...

How about this: Go fuck yourself you piece of shit troll.
 
JesusAI said:
Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Argumentum_ad_populum
In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum ( Latin for "appeal to the people") [1] is a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because the majority thinks so. [2] Alternative names [ edit] Other names for the fallacy include: appeal to (common) belief [3] [4] appeal to popularity [5] [6]
Click to expand...

I provided several answers, and you cherry picked one. In fact, you pretend like the other answers I wrote don't exist.

So you did not ask your question in good faith, and you were not genuinely interested in answers.

That's unsurprising.



JesusAI said:
why is one better?
Click to expand...

Besides the fact that sculpting and casting a free-standing bronze statue at that scale is an unprecedented engineering, technical, and artistic challenge, compared to sketching a cartoon?

Besides the fact that millions of people travel to Florence to see Donatello's David, while Finland Tom languishes in obscurity?

Besides the fact that Donatello treats the human form with a graceful fluidity and aesthetic realism, and presents it in a non-pornographic, non-stiff , cartoonish way?
 
Cypress said:
I provided several answers, and you cherry picked one. In fact, you pretend like the other answers I wrote don't exist.

So you did not ask your question in good faith, and you were not genuinely interested in answers.

That's unsurprising.





Besides the fact that sculpting and casting a free-standing bronze statue at that scale is an unprecedented engineering, technical, and artistic challenge, compared to sketching a cartoon?

Besides the fact that millions of people travel to Florence to see Donatello's David, while Finland Tom languishes in obscurity?

Besides the fact that Donatello treats the human form with a graceful fluidity and aesthetic realism, and presents it in a non-pornographic, non-stiff , cartoonish way?
Click to expand...

they're different categories of art.

is van gogh shit because he's not a sculptor?

you can't hide your white supremacist fear of Big Black Cock.
 
Cypress said:
You are free to believe that the cartoons of Finland Tom are superior art than the work of Renaissance sculptor Donatello.

tom-of-finland-leather-duo-800x800.jpg

819+-EnNe5L._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
Click to expand...

Or Michelangelo!R (2).jpg
 
Doc Dutch said:
Why else would he carry a link to your manifesto in his signature?
Click to expand...
I appreciate you admitting to being this stupid. You can't think of a reason he, or anyone, would have a link to additional information in a signature. Well, now everyone understands your cognitive handicap.

Just try to remain comfortable and always remember your male nurse is there to "back you up."

terry-spanky.gif


Doc Dutch said:
How long have you, Into the Night and gfm7175 been "close" friends?
Click to expand...
Wait a minute, aren't we all supposed to be the same person?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top