MtnBiker
New member
Which is fine, but is a matter of luck. The lucky have an unfortunate tendency to begrudge assistance to the less fortunate: it's one of the oldest stories in the world.
What a load of crap!
Which is fine, but is a matter of luck. The lucky have an unfortunate tendency to begrudge assistance to the less fortunate: it's one of the oldest stories in the world.
I beg your pardon? Which point be excremental, in your sage opinion?What a load of crap!
sure; just like the old soviet union...and we all know how THAT turned out!
Grind was raised in a privileged household, even as I was myself, is most certainly a stroke of luck. Good fortune, as they say.
There is no such thing as "property rights." It's a purely social construct, subject to revision at any time as all social constructs are.
In the practical sense, when we treat property rights as absolute, it facilitates the concentration of power/wealth into the hands of the landed even more quickly than otherwise.
Rent control EVERY neighborhood and the problems with it go away. Therein lies the answer.
What a load of crap!
Well, why charge them at all? The product of the work of others is valueless and should be treated as such!Alright lets put that logic to work. There are those that do not have luck in their lives. Why stop with lower rent costs? They should be charged less than market value for other purchases as well, a six pack of soda, an admission ticket to a movie, a monthly cable tv bill to name a few. If indeed they have no luck in their lives why should we begrudge them the benifit of such experiences that other may enjoy?
It's the plan to do away with the Middle Class, they pretend like it is the Right Wing that does it, but the Middle gets pulled from both sides....Rent control is one of those things that can be cloaked by the "intention" of its proponents as being noble. It is helping the little guy. It protects the less fortunate from the rising costs of living in this country! Hooray for Rent Control!
I'm middle class, don't make a whole lot of money, and I pay through the teeth to live in this shoebox in Warner Center. But other people in the same building pay less than 1/3 of what I pay (even though 1/3 has been proven to be an imaginary number, much like i, the square root of negative 1). They only leave when they die, and they are tying up about 1/5th of the building. (1/5th is a real number, because of base 10)
Simple economics. The owner of the building has to get as much as they can for apartments, and the reduction in supply due to rent control increases demand, and I pay more. I'm the "little guy" and I pay more. Thanks for all the good intentions socialists. But I'd rather do without them.
That is right why should the rest of the country subsidize the costal areas prone to hurricanes ?
Irony update: I just got notice that the apartments rent is going up to $1,735 per month. I wonder if the rent controlled people's rent is going up too?
If you like the whole redistribution system, move to Cuba. Take it the hell out of our country though.
what is that supposed to mean?
Money has never been an issue for me or my family....
I don't need student loans, financial aid, or anything... we have plenty of money.
Which is fine, but is a matter of luck. The lucky have an unfortunate tendency to begrudge assistance to the less fortunate: it's one of the oldest stories in the world.
What does this have to do with anything? We should rent control everywhere because the south has hurricanes?
what is that supposed to mean?
Money has never been an issue for me or my family....
I don't need student loans, financial aid, or anything... we have plenty of money.
Redistribution is everywhere.
Irony update: I just got notice that the apartments rent is going up to $1,735 per month. I wonder if the rent controlled people's rent is going up too?
If you like the whole redistribution system, move to Cuba. Take it the hell out of our country though.