STFU you brainless terrorist loving asshat.
Report of Special Counsel Jack Smith - Vol 1 Released
- Thread starter Poor Richard Saunders
- Start date
The entire premise of Smiths pointless report fails when using the term "fake electors." I am sure you will have to be constantly reminded of that fact due to the incredibly small size of your brain and lack of education.
Projection. Take your own advice, you brainless terrorist loving halfwit.
I wish you could think.
Unproven and lacking in any credible evidence halfwit.
And then along comes a history lesson for TD.There is no such thing as a "faithless elector" you boorish dunce.
Faithless elector - Wikipedia
As of the 2020 election, there have been a total of 165 instances of faithlessness, 90 of which were for president, while 75 were for vice president. They have never swung an election, and nearly all have voted for third party candidates or non-candidates, as opposed to switching their support to a major opposing candidate. There were 63 faithless electors in 1872 when Horace Greeley died between Election Day and when the Electoral College convened, but Ulysses S. Grant had already clinched enough to win reelection. During the 1836 election, Virginia's entire 23-man electoral delegation faithlessly abstained from voting for victorious Democratic vice presidential nominee Richard M. Johnson. The loss of Virginia's support caused Johnson to fall one electoral vote short of a majority, causing the vice-presidential race to be thrown into the U.S. Senate under a contingent election. The presidential election itself was not in dispute because Virginia's electors voted for Democratic presidential nominee Martin Van Buren as pledged. The Senate elected Johnson as vice president anyway after a party-line vote. Uniquely, Richard Nixon always had a faithless elector in one of his state slates during his three runs for President. Oklahoma in 1960, North Carolina in 1968 and Virginia in 1972 all voted for Nixon but one elector cast a vote for another person.
Again, there is no such thing as "fake electors" you mentally challenged dumbass.
Thread trolling dumbass.
Yet, you don't call out your fellow low IQ leftist asshats constantly engaged in childlike insults, much like you do.
Hypocrite and stupid. A winning combo.
A citation of the law is not an unsubstantiated claim. It is a citation of an existing law that actually exists in US law.
If you would care to rebut the existence of the law than please feel free.
Truth Detector has to be one of the stupidest people here since he doesn't know the difference between a law and an allegation of criminal activity.
Wikipedia.And then along comes a history lesson for TD.
Faithless ElectorFaithless elector - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
As of the 2020 election, there have been a total of 165 instances of faithlessness, 90 of which were for president, while 75 were for vice president. They have never swung an election, and nearly all have voted for third party candidates or non-candidates, as opposed to switching their support to a major opposing candidate. There were 63 faithless electors in 1872 when Horace Greeley died between Election Day and when the Electoral College convened, but Ulysses S. Grant had already clinched enough to win reelection. During the 1836 election, Virginia's entire 23-man electoral delegation faithlessly abstained from voting for victorious Democratic vice presidential nominee Richard M. Johnson. The loss of Virginia's support caused Johnson to fall one electoral vote short of a majority, causing the vice-presidential race to be thrown into the U.S. Senate under a contingent election. The presidential election itself was not in dispute because Virginia's electors voted for Democratic presidential nominee Martin Van Buren as pledged. The Senate elected Johnson as vice president anyway after a party-line vote. Uniquely, Richard Nixon always had a faithless elector in one of his state slates during his three runs for President. Oklahoma in 1960, North Carolina in 1968 and Virginia in 1972 all voted for Nixon but one elector cast a vote for another person.
There is no such thing. It is a made up term by fools who know little about elections or our laws. It is a partisan hack term. You dolt.
Hey, halfwit, should Gore be prosecuted?
We're talking about Smith's report and his assertions dumbass. You can cite law all fucking day, but without proving that it was broken in a court of law with evidence and witnesses, and a charged persons ability to rebut claims, it is nothing more than hyperbolic bullshit.
Is there not a presumption of innocence until PROVEN guilty? Yes or no?
You calling anyone stupid is not merely ironic, but laughably ignorant given the incredibly stupid bullshit you post halfwit.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Fancy an IQ contest, Troofie ?Take your own advice you brainless terrorist hugging moron.
Haw, haw................................................haw.
Wow. You just like to prove how stupid you are, don't you?Wikipedia.
There is no such thing. It is a made up term by fools who know little about elections or our laws. It is a partisan hack term. You dolt.
Hey, halfwit, should Gore be prosecuted?
The term you were objecting to was "faithless electors" which is a term that has existed for over 100 years. It is not the same thing as an alternate slate of electors. A faithless elector is a legitimate elector casting an electoral vote for a candidate different than the person they are pledged to vote.
Congratulations on admitting you spend a hell of a lot of time spouting hyperbolic bullshit. I will save this quote for when you start talking about arresting Never Trumpers.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
^ Queen of trolls sez wut?Thread trolling dumbass.
I do fuckface
moon
Satire for Sanity
" Fuck face " ? Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Haw, haw...............................................haw.
P.S. You just lost.
Whatever you say sweet tits