Republican drugged granddaughters’ ice cream with cocaine and MDMA

Republicans have had nine years and numerous opportunities to ditch Trump and nominate a conservative with better qualifications and moral character.

The fact that they don't makes it clear they have a preference for amoral sleazebags.
While true, let's not forget that the Republican leadership was strongly against Trump in 2016. Those leaders were pulverized or left the Party in 2018. Those that remained were spineless, cowardly POS that were more afraid for their jobs than in doing their duty. They kowtowed to Trump and his army of pedophiles, traitors, authoritarians, racists and misogynists.

The Democrats weren't any better since in 2016, they were owned lock, stock and barrel by the Clintons who, in turn, bought Hillary's nomination.

While the blue-collar white man vote turned against Democrats in 2016, it was those faithful Democrats disgusted by the treatment of Bernie and Hillary's power grab that encouraged many to stay home on Election Day.

IMO, the Democrats are trying to rebuild but the Republicans are treading water waiting for Big Daddy to kick the big bucket.
 
Well that is not true.
Link us up to the Salon story with an elected Democrat who is labeled as a Democrat and who is cast in a negative light. Until you can find one we will wait patiently.
We? Meaning you and your MAGA supporters? LOL

Here's a few:


 
We? Meaning you and your MAGA supporters?

Here's a few:


Um... It mentions Cuomo, but does not give his party (also Cuomo is cast as "probable winner" and not in a negative light)... "Many Dems think that Cuomo..." Eric is mentioned, not his party... Do you notice the pattern? Even Hillary, didn't label her Democrat in the Headline... When it is a republican though, the first word of the headline was what?... Be honest, you can find it...

You have proven what I stated, not helped his argument at all.
 
That is the best advice I think I got today. I might take it, or might not. If I do not take it, I will regret it.
I'm only doing it fo a couple months as an experiment. Try it for a week.

Under the new system Damo set up, presumably for lil' ol' me LOL, it's easy to put them on ignore, but a little more difficult to get them off. You can no longer just "peek". You have to actually remove them from ignore.

IMO, this is good because it removes temptation. Pedo President supporters whine about "fake ignore" and the new system not only makes that more difficult but removes the temptation. My advice is to put them all on ignore and see if your life improves without these liars, scumbags and pedo supporters in it. :)
 
Um... It mentions Cuomo, but does not give his party (also Cuomo is cast as "probable winner" and not in a negative light)... "Many Dems think that Cuomo..." Eric is mentioned, not his party... Do you notice the pattern? Even Hillary, didn't label her Democrat in the Headline... When it is a republican though, the first word of the headline was what?... Be honest, you can find it...

You have proven what I stated, not helped his argument at all.
You don't know what party they belong to? Interesting.

My guess is that most Salon readers know who the Democrats are but not all the Republicans.

Notice they don't mention Trump is a Republican...or a pedo or a MAGAt. LOL

 
You don't know what party they belong to? Interesting.
You pretend you cannot comprehend what was stated? Not interesting, normal.

I asked for stories that label them as democrats and cast them in a negative light from that source. You gave me ones that proved what I said... if it is a democrat they are not labeled as such.

They are built to confirm the leftist bias, so that idiots, like WWW (and apparently yourself) will believe that the only people that "do those things" are republicans... WWW even stated so directly. <SMH>...

You can't think or argue. Do better, DU. You were doing so well not responding, what changed for you?
 
patriotism-is-so-different-these-days-v0-s1em4uhhn6mf1.jpeg
 
You pretend you cannot comprehend what was stated? Not interesting, normal....

....You can't think or argue. Do better, DU. You were doing so well not responding, what changed for you?
Wow. Is that another ban warning, sir?

The fact you clipped my Trump link is interesting.
 

Don't worry, Donald it's a dry heat where you're going, all pedophiles go to hell!​


dont-worry-donald-its-a-dry-heat-where-youre-going-all-v0-9h92uvszxdmf1.jpeg


They don't let sexual predators, pedophiles and rapists into heaven. You have a first class reservation to the fiery pits of Hell! Where you will find a refreshing glass of ice water, but your tiny hands are too small to pick it up.
 
I am certain a different site with the same story doesn't mention the party of the jackwipe. Most stories do not, however this guy was on a council, and Salon loves some confirmation bias so they aim to make democrats feel better about themselves by finding a rare example and then stamping it with political party when it fits their narrative. Same story with a Dem and it would be "councilmember" and would not mention the party. Then idiots like Wrong Way Walter (good ole WWW) think that means "more republicans" do such things, because he only gets news from sources that confirm how he feels about things.

Yes. It takes attention away from their disasters of a Mayor in LA, Chicago, Baltimore, D.C., and every other blue city daily.
 
lol. Walt has fallen for the propaganda. Since Salon only posts the party when the person is a republican he thinks that all the stories are about republicans.... Walt is stupid that way. WWW... He's a peach.

Salon had a pedophile on it's writing staff, and let it write a couple of articles running a pity party for itself. They then recently published an article by yet another sicko freak defending pedoes.

Todd Nickerson​

In September 2015, Salon published an article written by Todd Nickerson, moderator of Virtuous Pedophiles, about his experiences with being a non-offending pedophile, titled: "I'm a pedophile, but not a monster." This caused controversy at the time, with some commentators accusing it of being "pro-pedophile" (in the sense of being pro-child sexual abuse). This article and a follow-up were deleted in early 2017. Some saw a connection between their removal and the controversy surrounding Milo Yiannopoulos's remarks on child sexual abuse that emerged in February 2017, although Salon Media Group CEO and Salon acting editor-in-chief Jordan Hoffner told New York magazine that they had been removed in January 2017 due to "new editorial policies." A third article by sex researcher Debra Soh defending Nickerson's side is still published as of May 2025.


Nearly every week one of these left wing rags pops up to defend sexual deviancy. We're supposed to have sympathy for these deviants and feel sorry for them.
 
Back
Top