republican plan to keep the white house or conspiracy theory

StoneByStone said:
And then Obama invited Trump to the White House to help with the transition. Trump couldn't do that, which just shows that he doesn't care about the country like Obama and Hillary do.
Click to expand...

Obama had to leave. It was the end of his 2nd term.
Hillary tried to steal stuff from the White House when the Clintons left. White House security had to stop them.

None of you care about the country. You want to overthrow the United States and replace it with fascism by oligarchy.
 
Flash said:
Wrong again. The Constitution does not cover the topic of objecting to the electoral votes submitted to Congress.
Click to expand...
Never said it did.
Flash said:
That is covered in the Electoral Count Act of 1887.
Click to expand...
So? Are you saying that is not law?
Flash said:
You are confusing that with the 12th amendment that deals with the House choosing the president if no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes. In that case each state gets one vote in the House.
Click to expand...
fI am not confusing anything. YOU are. Semantics fallacy.
 
Into the Night said:
Obama had to leave. It was the end of his 2nd term.
Hillary tried to steal stuff from the White House when the Clintons left. White House security had to stop them.

None of you care about the country. You want to overthrow the United States and replace it with fascism by oligarchy.
Click to expand...

Of course Obama had to leave, but he invited Trump to the White House to help with the transition, which is what I said. I know you're stupid, but I figured you could at least read.
 
Flash said:
"An air conditioning repairman was driving in south Houston around 5:30 a.m. on Oct. 19 when a black SUV rammed the back of his truck. When he pulled over in the darkness and got out to check if the other driver was OK, the man in the SUV drew a pistol and ordered him to the ground.

He complied. As the other driver drove a knee into his back, the repairman saw two other vehicles pull up, and feared he would be killed in what he believed was a predawn carjacking.

Instead, according to an indictment announced Tuesday by the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, the incident was a brazen attempt by a former Houston police captain to secure evidence to support a far-fetched claim that prominent local Democrats had orchestrated a scheme to harvest more than 700,000 ballots leading up to the Nov. 3 election. The ex-lawman, Mark A. Aguirre, 63, faces a felony charge of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon stemming from the Oct. 19 confrontation."

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/ne...M0UNcFsqrY5pk5HzMv2DZesGod1cyuS-SHVFQctdAYVBY
Click to expand...

no evidence.
 
Into the Night said:
I am not confusing anything. YOU are. Semantics fallacy.
Click to expand...

The difference between a vote by all members of the House compared to each state having one vote is not semantics. It is the difference between 50 or 435 votes.

The one vote per state only applies to the House choosing the president. The vote to settle any objections to the electoral vote count on January 6 is by all members of the House.

Anybody can disagree but they are disagreeing with facts easily proven.

The scenario being envisioned by the Trump supporters refusing to recognize reality is that if Congress refuses to vote on settling the objection issue and never declares a president. Once more grasping at straws.

As JPP Republicans repeatedly and correctly told the Democrats in 2016: "You lost. Get over it."
 
Flash said:
Exactly. The crazy former police captain had no evidence the air conditioning repairman had any illegal ballots in his truck. He just rammed him based on crazy conspiracy theory rumors about a stolen election.
Click to expand...

no. your anecdotal little story never happened.
 
Into the Night said:
Yes it does.
Click to expand...

Copy and post that provision from the law so we can all see your proof.

"The House and Senate met separately as required and using a roll call vote the objections were widely rejected. The House denied the objection in 31-267 vote, and the Senate denied it in a 1-74 vote."

Strange how the House had 297 votes in 2005 if the House was only allowed one vote per state. You previously said it was "irrelevant" but it seems pretty relevant in trying to prove the issue.
 
Flash said:
Because something doesn't fit your partisan prejudices does not mean it is fake. I doubt the DA is going to put up fake news on her webpage.

If you want to delve into fake news look at all those crazy voter fraud stories.
Click to expand...

of course it means that.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
practice what you're preaching
Click to expand...

Point me to any statement regarding a specific fact I said that's not true.

You claimed the House/Senate could reject Biden as president because you don't understand the process and/or you didn't care to research. You're a lying and/or stupid piece of shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top