Revisiting the claim that 'Democrats rigged the election'

I will begin with saying that the fact that the Democrats and their media enablers demanding that everyone state the election was fair and without corruption is a red flag.
No, the 'red flag' was Trump, declaring at numerous rallies, LONG BEFORE THE FIRST BALLOT WAS EVER CAST, that 'the only way Democrats can win is if they rig the election', thereby priming the conspiracy theory pump he would later invoke when he lost.
Here is why I doubt the election results. But most importantly, why any election using mail in ballots should be met with skepticism.

Using the numbers as of today, which are materially similar to Binney’s, we find a huge issue. If we have 213.8 million registered voters in the US and 66.2% of all voters voted in the 2020 election, that equals 141.5 million voters who voted in the 2020 election (Binney shows 140 million which is materially the same).
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...on-votes-eligible-voters-voted-2020-election/
The gatewaypundit has achieved something no other website has achieved, virtually ALL of it's articles fail factchecks. It is the worst website on the internet, for information. But, I'm not quick to use the 'kill-the-messenger' counter argument, and I will actually debunk your claim rather than rely totally on a KTM, though that website deserves it:

Oh, the audacity of trying to warp basic arithmetic to sow doubt about the 2020 election! It's as if some folks are stuck in a perpetual state of denial, clutching at straws to spin a tale of fraud where none exists. Let's tear this nonsense apart, shall we?

First, let's talk about those voter numbers—213.8 million registered voters. Sure, that’s within the ballpark. But then you throw out this figure, 66.2% voter turnout, as if it’s the holy grail of election data. And you try to magically transform this into exactly 141.5 million votes. Here’s the problem: you’re playing fast and loose with numbers.

Voter turnout percentage is based on eligible voters, not just registered voters. The 66.2% turnout rate you're quoting comes from an estimated eligible voter population of around 239 million people, not the 213.8 million registered voters. When you account for this, the number of actual voters in 2020 makes perfect sense—over 158 million ballots were cast, matching up with the highest voter turnout in over a century.

But instead of acknowledging this, you conjure up this bogus comparison with a turnout number divorced from reality. If you’re going to doubt the election, at least get your facts straight.


Based on data from NBC, Biden got 81,283,098 votes and Trump got 74,222,958 votes. Other votes totaled 2,926,539. That sums to 158,432,595 votes. How is that even remotely possible?

I find it very difficult to believe that an incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist could win with 80 million votes, bettering Obama by 15,367,303 votes. A guy who could barely fill a thimble of supporters at rallies and rarely came out of the basement or remember what office he was actually running for.

I find it very difficult to believe that Trump, garnering 74,222,958 votes, which beat a much more popular Obama by 8.307,163 votes and who had massive, enthusiastic crowds at his events, could lose an election by 7,060,140 votes.

I find it difficult to believe that Trump, who bettered his 2016 election WIN by 11,237,852 votes and would still lose.

I find it difficult to believe that a election turnout for Obama was 57.1% and 9.2% lower than this election at 66.3%. That's the highest turnout for a boring candidate in the history of the Republic.

Turnout increased in every state and in 98 percent of the nation’s counties.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...voter-turnout/

I find it difficult to believe that Republicans INCREASED their House presence by 13 seats, yet Trump lost by such a large margin to an incompetent, unaccomplished, senile 79 year old racist.
Ah, yes, the old song and dance of disbelief, wrapped in a cloak of selective outrage and arithmetic acrobatics. It’s almost as if some people believe that by repeating their disbelief enough times, they can conjure up a different reality. So let’s dissect this mountain of doubt, piece by piece, and expose it for what it truly is—pure, unadulterated fiction.

First, the incredulity over Biden’s 81 million votes. Let’s address the elephant in the room: voter turnout was at a historic high in 2020. The pandemic, mail-in voting expansion, and an electorate more polarized than ever contributed to a turnout that blew past previous records. This isn’t some conspiracy—this is the result of democracy in action. Comparing Biden’s numbers to Obama’s in 2008 is like comparing apples to oranges. Different elections, different circumstances, and—guess what—different candidates.

Now, on to Trump’s numbers. Yes, Trump did receive over 74 million votes, which is a significant increase from 2016. But guess what? The electorate didn’t shrink in the last four years—more people registered, more people voted, and more people decided that they’d had enough of Trump’s antics. Enthusiastic crowds at rallies don’t translate to votes—those are optics, not ballots. The idea that rally size should correlate directly to electoral victory is as absurd as thinking that likes on a tweet determine the next president.

Let’s not forget the claim about Obama’s turnout in 2008. Sure, Obama’s election had a 57.1% turnout, but comparing that to 2020 is disingenuous at best. The nation was gripped by the most divisive election in modern history, with a sitting president whose behavior was a constant source of controversy, and a pandemic that made voting by mail more accessible than ever. This wasn't just about Biden—it was about a referendum on Trump. Biden won because many voted, not for Biden, but against Trump. I know I did.

Finally, the insinuation that turnout increased in every state and nearly every county as if that’s somehow suspicious. No, that’s called democracy. When people are motivated, whether by passion or outrage, they turn out to vote. That’s how elections work, not by some bizarre calculus where only the candidate you support is allowed to win.

So yes, Biden won with 81 million votes. Trump lost despite his 74 million. And the sooner we accept the facts, the sooner we can move forward as a country, instead of indulging in these fact-free fantasies that only serve to undermine the very democracy we claim to cherish.
 
Tony Bobulinsky is a straight shooter.


Bobulinski failed to produce any evidence for his claims.

Bobulinski’s claims have never been verified, however, and multiple other witnesses have told the committee the president was not involved in his son’s business ventures.


Credible news organizations have found no evidence to corroborate Bobulinski’s claims about a role in the proposed venture for Joe Biden.
 
unconstitutional........it only took a handful of election officials in three counties in three states to come up with the 47,000 votes that put the Pale Faced Pedophile in the Oval Office as the first president elected in an unconstitutional election.......
The President is not elected by popular vote.

However, the votes for the electoral college were quite tainted, and illegally conducted in several States.

He's ignoring the evidence again, which has already been presented to him. Evidence like:

* Changing election laws ex-post-facto DURING the election.
* Pennsylvania holding the election for a week, in violation of Congressional authority.
* 'Counting' after hours with NO OBSERVERS present, and behind closed doors.
* Mathematical improbability that all votes 'counted' after hours were for Biden, reversing the trend.
* Video of illegal activity in election offices, such as writing out 'ballots' and running them through the machine multiple times.
* Affidavits by election workers, testifying of election fraud, from BOTH parties.
* Machines that mysteriously malfunction in republican oriented districts.
* Machines that have demonstrable software faults that allow changing of votes by unauthorized personnel.

Seven States never chose their electors. No electoral college formed as a result, causing the 2020 election to fault.
No one was elected President or Vice President.

* Mike Pence broke the law by choosing electors for a State (he has no such authority!).

Joe Biden was installed (not elected) by The Oligarchy (the strings behind the puppet), consisting mostly of Obama (effectively as a 3rd term in office) and Nancy Pelosi.

Kamala is Vice-Puppet.

The Oligarchy decided by dictat to eject Joe Biden (which received the bulk of the delegates) and replace him with Kamala (which received no votes).

The Oligarchy has tried every tactic to throw the 2024 election, including political persecutions, 'smear' campaigns (gaslighting), attempted assassination, bring up the 'election virus' again, etc.

1) IF the election cycles successfully and Trump is elected, expect violence from the Democrats and civil war, which the Democrats WANT. Keep yer powder dry!
2) IF the election cycles successfully and Kamala is elected, expect shortages in food, sundries, gasoline, etc. as Kamala implements her price controls and other socialism. Also expect continued violence and looting as criminals freely roam the streets and nothing is done about homeless and drugs. Also expect more political imprisonment and seizure of private property. Keep yer powder dry!
3) IF the election faults AGAIN (this will make it three times in a row, since 2020 and 2022 both faulted due to Democrat election fraud), expect civil war, which the Democrats WANT (and has called for multiple times!). Keep yer powder dry!

Regardless of the outcome of the election of 2024, whether it successfully cycles or not, we are headed for some tough times ahead.

Learn to garden, stock up what you can and preserve what you can. Get to know your neighbors and support each other. You will need them in the days to come. Like you, neighbors want to protect their homes, cars, and families. Remember that.
 
There's a dozen or more battleground states, and no one knows, at the outset, which 2 or 3 states will be the decisive states, so operatives would have to recruited months in advance, installed, in all of the battleground states, and there is a perimeter of those states that are iffy, so it would really require about 15 or more states, noting there are dem and repub monitors, you'll have to find repub co-conspirators, in all of the key states. And then there are audits, etc.

Logistically it's well nigh impossible, not to mention than with such conspiracies, someone leaks, the word gets out, and whistleblowers emerge. And, why would anyone risk going to jail when there is no immediate financial gain? No, it's absurd,. the more you think about it.

AS for your pejorative, not only do you not have evidence, you are an asshole for trafficking in such fuckwit language about Joe Biden.
Logistically quite possible, since only a few offices have to be infiltrated. The Democrat party IS a conspiracy. A nationwide conspiracy.
 
I see no links from you. Democrats love rabbit holes.
I provide links on request. If I don't have them, i will acknowledge 'it is my opinion'.

I requested a link from you. If you have it, please provide it.

If not, your premise fails or is 'just an opinion'. Opinions are nice, but they are not strong arguments.
 
a massive politically coordinated conspiracy sufficient to deliberately throw an election would have an infrastructure, a hierarchy, thousands of texts, emails, recruiting months in advance, planning and coordination, all of which in a highly decentralized system which varies considerably from state to state makes the idea really preposterous, given that there would be leaks, whistleblowers, surveillance, you're in the absurd zone. Look at the evidence that was garnered against Trump for his overthrow attempt. We have TONS of it, and when he goes to Trial, his goose is thoroughly roasted. He couldn't pull it off, no one can, the task is too big. However, Trump might have come close if he had installed a more acquiescent VP. But, what he did isn't what he and repubs allege that dems did, they allege dems tampered with ballots, implemented the rigging via internal methods.
What 'overthrow attempt'?? Trump never tried to overthrow anything.

DON'T TRY TO DENY DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD!
 
I provide links on request. If I don't have them, i will acknowledge 'it is my opinion'.

I requested a link from you. If you have it, please provide it.

If not, your premise fails or is 'just an opinion'. Opinions are nice, but they are not strong arguments.
So...no link, eh?

Denial of philosophy.

Links are not a proof. Opinions ARE arguments, assuming the person commits no fallacy in presenting them.
 
Bobulinski failed to produce any evidence for his claims.

Bobulinski’s claims have never been verified, however, and multiple other witnesses have told the committee the president was not involved in his son’s business ventures.


Credible news organizations have found no evidence to corroborate Bobulinski’s claims about a role in the proposed venture for Joe Biden.
he had tons of evidence.

Dems don't do evidence.
 
Back
Top