How many of these countries had a government similar to ours, and how many were under dictators or monarchs?
All of them and US as well?
How many of these countries had a government similar to ours, and how many were under dictators or monarchs?
What about when Roosevelt locked up everyone of Japanese ancestory? And then threatened the USSC if they disnt support him?
Guess you think banks are the cause of bank robbery and cars are the cause of car theft...why do pinheads look at
things upside down and inside out....
Guess you think banks are the cause of bank robbery and cars are the cause of car theft...why do pinheads look at
things upside down and inside out....
when the government ignores the laws that were set down for their existence and function, there is no duty for the rightful masters of that government to obey the laws either.
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government" - Declaration of Independence
“It’s not gun registration that produces gun confiscation and genocide, it’s people who do.”
What about when Roosevelt locked up everyone of Japanese ancestory? And then threatened the USSC if they disnt support him?
Okay. Let's apply NRA ideas to the world situation. We'll all be much safer when every nation has nukes.
So people are nations now?
registration leads to confiscation. our own recent history proves it, ala the after effects of the cali assault wepons ban“It’s not gun registration that produces gun confiscation and genocide, it’s people who do.”
I also recognize non-sequitur.I expected you to recognize a false analogy when you read it.
What about when Roosevelt locked up everyone of Japanese ancestory? And then threatened the USSC if they disnt support him?
I would never have supported that. Just like I don't approve of locking up people at Guantanamo based on thin and/or phony evidence that they're terrorists. Yet almost every rightie on this and other forums cheers Gitmo using the specious argument that it's about national security. It was BS in the 1940s and it's BS now.
No response Christie? Maybe we should all the Arab population of Dearborn, when back during the 60's the MI governor said the National Guard would be called in to oppress them. Or the kids shot at Kent State. Or the kids that were fire bombed at Waco. But those kids don't matter to you do they?
You still voted for Obama, who keeps the Gitmo policy in place. You would have still voted for FDR, and he wasn't going to budge on the Japanese issue. But that's not the issue. The issue is that our government DOES have a history, very recent in fact, of oppressing peoples. That you would think that all of a sudden it cannot and/or will not, is ignorance.
When I'm out of class.Either you're being sarcastic or you've never really read any of my posts.
Link me up on the MI governor oppressing Arabs in the 1960s, I couldn't find anything.
The Kent State students weren't armed but the Branch Davidians were, and what good did it do?
Either you're being sarcastic or you've never really read any of my posts.
Link me up on the MI governor oppressing Arabs in the 1960s, I couldn't find anything.
The Kent State students weren't armed but the Branch Davidians were, and what good did it do?
a single person can be oppressed. YOU don't know what oppression is because you beg for it."Oppressing peoples" isn't the same as taking limited action, however wrong, against the few. Do you people even know what oppression means?
they were attacked with military hardware AND did not initiate force. as a result of your statist desires to handicap freedom, those children were murdered. BY THE GOVERNMENT AND NOT THEIR PARENTS!!!!!
Ugh.
I disagreed with the raid on that compound, how many times do I have to say it?