Richard Dawkins destroys muslim on morality

No; he destroys Abrahamic religion on morality.

Ever heard of thighing, what religion allows that?

Ayatollah Khomeini in his Little Green Book asserted “It is not illegal for an adult male to ‘thigh’ or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her."

The denunciation of the “thighing” of infants and young girls comes towards the end of the interview.

 
Ever heard of thighing, what religion allows that?

Ayatollah Khomeini in his Little Green Book asserted “It is not illegal for an adult male to ‘thigh’ or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her."

The denunciation of the “thighing” of infants and young girls comes towards the end of the interview.


I didn't hear the use of the word in the video. Sorry.

Regardless it was a good indictment of organised religion in general.
 
I didn't hear the use of the word in the video. Sorry.

Regardless it was a good indictment of organised religion in general.

She starts talking about marriage for pleasure in other words 24 hour marriages for Shias to go with prostitutes. Then at around 3:50 talks about enjoyment of the thighs.
 
God, it is tortuous dealing with your thought processes at times. Did I say that he did? Anyway thanks for revealing that you never really looked at the Bahraini video.

I didn't need to.

The topic was the Dawkins film, in which he indicts all Abrahamic religion, (just as I said), NOT muslim, per se.
What the fuck bearing does the second film have on what Dawkins said? Good Lord, you are off base today. Too long at the pub last night?
 
I didn't need to.

The topic was the Dawkins film, in which he indicts all Abrahamic religion, (just as I said), NOT muslim, per se.
What the fuck bearing does the second film have on what Dawkins said? Good Lord, you are off base today. Too long at the pub last night?

So do Jews and Christians kill homosexuals, apostates and stone women to death? I cannot determine whether you are trying to be cute or really are extremely dense. Please show me another religion that condones thighing as does the Shia version of Islam.
 
Last edited:
I didn't need to.

The topic was the Dawkins film, in which he indicts all Abrahamic religion, (just as I said), NOT muslim, per se.
What the fuck bearing does the second film have on what Dawkins said? Good Lord, you are off base today. Too long at the pub last night?

Well, it's my thread so screw you.
 
So do Jews and Christians kill homosexuals, apostates and stone women to death? I cannot determine whether you are trying to be cute or really are extremely dense. Please show me another religion that condones thighing as does the Shia version of Islam.

So Jesus didn't say "let he who has no sins cast the first stone"? Stay down for goodness sake, the fight is over and you lost. Now you are just looking stupid. The Bible is full of things conviently ignored by the faithful, as Dawkins pointed out.

The Old Testament is even worse.
 
So Jesus didn't say "let he who has no sins cast the first stone"? Stay down for goodness sake, the fight is over and you lost. Now you are just looking stupid. The Bible is full of things conviently ignored by the faithful, as Dawkins pointed out.

The Old Testament is even worse.

Holy fuck, I am talking about the present day you moron.
 
Holy fuck, I am talking about the present day you moron.

How many have been murdered by present day "christians" in your own country Tom?

Some idiot tagged the Dawkins film as an indictment of muslims and you fell for it.
Get over it already, you are wrong. Man up and admit it.
 
Right Wing Authoritarian http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/TheAuthoritarians.pdf

Or... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_authoritarianism

Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) is a personality and ideological variable studied in political, social, and personality psychology. Right-wing authoritarians are people who have a high degree of willingness to submit to authorities they perceive as established and legitimate, who adhere to societal conventions and norms, and who are hostile and punitive in their attitudes towards people who don't adhere to them. They value uniformity and are in favour of using group authority, including coercion, to achieve it.

Right-wing authoritarianism is measured by the RWA scale. The first scored item on the scale states, "Our country desperately needs a mighty leader who will do what has to be done to destroy the radical new ways and sinfulness that are ruining us." People who strongly agree with this are showing a tendency toward authoritarian submission (Our country desperately needs a mighty leader), authoritarian aggression (who will do what has to be done to destroy), and conventionalism (the radical new ways and sinfulness that are ruining us).[5].
Psychometrically, the RWA scale was a significant improvement over the F-scale, which was the original measure of the authoritarian personality. The F-scale was worded so that agreement always indicated an authoritarian response, thus leaving it susceptible to the acquiescence response bias. The RWA scale is balanced to have an equal number of pro and anti authoritarian statements. The RWA scale also has excellent internal reliability, with coefficient alpha typically measuring between 0.85 and 0.94.[6]
The RWA scale has been modified over the years, as many of the items lost their social significance as society changed. The current version is 22 items long, and can be found online.

There are many who are self identified as liberal who still exhibit RWA tendencies as this OP and his attempt to push his preconceived notions and agenda shows.
 
Back
Top