Rioters liberal or conservative? Trump or Biden people?

Obama won because Blacks turned out in record numbers. They didn't do that for any other candidate. When surveyed about why they liked Obama, most Blacks said because it's time we had a black president.

I think this sums it up.

In other words, you don't know and continue to make shit up.

I think that sums it up. :palm:
 
Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
Unlike you, I've actually spoken with people involved in Antifa.

its quite likely you did so while you were throwing rocks through windows and lighting fires in camaraderie......
 
As I sit here on lockdown with my son in my business preventing looters from destroying or stealing all I have worked for, I thought of a great question for our forum. These piece of crap looting and destroying and rioting are they dems or repubs? Liberals or conservatives?

I know the answer what say you?

You don't know the answer anymore than anyone else!

You are basically just running your mouth!
 
You don't know the answer anymore than anyone else!

You are basically just running your mouth!

I have spent the last two nights slamming his dumbass around like an endless game of "Whack-a-mole".
You should check out his idiotic defense of tRumps golf playing after criticizing Obama for playing golf. It is hilarious to read.
He claims to know EXACTLY how much work tRump does on a daily basis as well. Talk about eat up with a case of "the tRump dumbass", this guy has it.
 
I have spent the last two nights slamming his dumbass around like an endless game of "Whack-a-mole".
You should check out his idiotic defense of tRumps golf playing after criticizing Obama for playing golf. It is hilarious to read.
He claims to know EXACTLY how much work tRump does on a daily basis as well. Talk about eat up with a case of "the tRump dumbass", this guy has it.

He is a fool that is going down with his GOD- GOOD OLE DONNIE!

Now that the Republican Senators are realizing that Donald Trump is risking their chances of holding onto the Senate, they are starting to distance themselves from Donald Trump as we speak.

But not this fool! He is still in Fantasy Land!
 
To the OP question of this thread, the rioters and looters are almost certainly Leftist in political view. This is how I have long described the difference between the radical Right and radical Left:

The far Right tends to act individually. They have a tendency towards being very deadly but acting on their own. Their body count is usually pretty high. Timothy McVey, the Oklahoma City bomber would be a good example of this at the extreme.

The far Left tends to act as a group or bloc. They have a tendency towards large riots where they commit massive low grade violence and property damage. They generally cause few deaths but the collective damage and injuries caused far exceed what some idiot on the far Right does. Yes, they usually don't kill anyone, but that's hardly a valid measure on its own. Ruining the lives of hundreds, even thousands and causing millions or in more extreme cases, billions in property damage and medical bills far exceeds what some individual on the far Right does.

We're seeing that here with this latest round of protests where rioting and looting accompanied them. And, no, arguing that property can be replaced is a canard. Property destroyed costs money, time, and effort to repair or replace. The damage isn't free and comes at a cost. People's lives likewise have a cost associated with them. Yes, they do. That's what insurance companies do on a daily basis--they issue policies that define the cost of a human life. Personal injury lawyers and courts do the same thing. So, the argument "You can't put a price on a human life..." is completely erroneous.

What we're seeing is the Left in action supported by non-political criminals.
 
To the OP question of this thread, the rioters and looters are almost certainly Leftist in political view. This is how I have long described the difference between the radical Right and radical Left:

The far Right tends to act individually. They have a tendency towards being very deadly but acting on their own. Their body count is usually pretty high. Timothy McVey, the Oklahoma City bomber would be a good example of this at the extreme.

The far Left tends to act as a group or bloc. They have a tendency towards large riots where they commit massive low grade violence and property damage. They generally cause few deaths but the collective damage and injuries caused far exceed what some idiot on the far Right does. Yes, they usually don't kill anyone, but that's hardly a valid measure on its own. Ruining the lives of hundreds, even thousands and causing millions or in more extreme cases, billions in property damage and medical bills far exceeds what some individual on the far Right does.

We're seeing that here with this latest round of protests where rioting and looting accompanied them. And, no, arguing that property can be replaced is a canard. Property destroyed costs money, time, and effort to repair or replace. The damage isn't free and comes at a cost. People's lives likewise have a cost associated with them. Yes, they do. That's what insurance companies do on a daily basis--they issue policies that define the cost of a human life. Personal injury lawyers and courts do the same thing. So, the argument "You can't put a price on a human life..." is completely erroneous.

What we're seeing is the Left in action supported by non-political criminals.

I beg to differ. The Far Right also acts in blocks:

* The KKK.
* Skinheads.
* White Supremacy groups.

Just to name a few........)
 
Back
Top