Rittenhouse… likely not guilty.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Another point to come up in trial. I doubt the Kyle's lawyers will put him on the stand so it's up to the defense to justify why a minor was armed and sent into a protest miles from his home in another state.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Excellent point. $50 says it's because the white supremacist domestic terrorist Trumpers are fucking hypocrites. Who knows what actual crimes these fucking scumbags are guilty of committing in the name of Trump and "white pride"?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Because you're afraid of the FBI?
I see. So why has he been charged with a crime for carrying it then? Do prosecutors normally charge someone with a crime when it was not illegal?
His actions are what will be the deciding factor in whether he is found guilty of murder or not. The fact that he shot 4 people is evidence that will be introduced at his trial.
Edit - Error in the post. The number of people shot was 3. Not 4.
Last edited:
Again
What was the DEADLY FORCE unarmed Ashli Babbitt was using at the time she was shot?
LOL, keep your day job, whatever the fuck that is. It certainly isn't 'doctor' or 'lawyer'. You are implying that a person can claim self defense and shoot as many people as he wants to regardless. It's so fucking stupid I didn't even think YOU would come up with it. Carry on.
If he had surrendered after shooting the FIRST person the second person would be alive. So no, he didn't try hard enough, because he DIDN'T TRY AT ALL.
She was trying to break into Congress to hang Mike Pence.
You asked for a link. Link provided.
Where did I say the fact that Rosenbaum was mentally ill made it ok to shoot him ?
or... "the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself."
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/iii/48
If someone tries to grab my loaded weapon from me in anger I'm going to shoot that person every time. That's a reasonable action. Hell , it's expected.
WTF? In anger? The guy was an ACTIVE SHOOTER. Yes, you are allowed to try and take his gun away from him.
Again
What was the DEADLY FORCE unarmed Ashli Babbitt was using at the time she was shot?
Correct. It was illegal for Rittenhouse to possess that weapon. Minimum age for possessing a rifle in Wisconsin is 18. Rittenhouse was a cop wanabee, he can't claim he didn't know this.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Not sure why the defense would have to justify why a minor was armed and went to a protest miles from home. I'm sure there were rioters and looters present that were miles from home. Does the prosecution have to justify their presence at the riot?
Turns out they were in the wrong anyway. The cop that shot Blake was deemed justified in doing it.
When did Kyle Rittenhouse become a police officer? The rules for police officers are different than they are for private citizens who are illegally carrying a gun.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
4? I thought there were three.
Since it was illegal for him to carry the gun, the defense may have to address this issue. Just as looters and arsonists would have to justify why they showed up with crowbars or lighters if they want to claim it wasn't their intent to commit a crime.