Rittenhouse… likely not guilty.

Not sure why the defense would have to justify why a minor was armed and went to a protest miles from home. I'm sure there were rioters and looters present that were miles from home. Does the prosecution have to justify their presence at the riot?
Turns out they were in the wrong anyway. The cop that shot Blake was deemed justified in doing it.

Not one thing you said is relevant. Not one. Doesn't matter if the shooting of Blake was justified. It doesn't matter if there were 'rioters and looters' present. If they committed crimes, they should be arrested. Rittenhouse came to an area of civil unrest with a gun that he was not allowed to possess. He was not invited there by anyone. He killed two people with that gun, and then fled without contacting 911 or telling the police ON THE SCENE what he'd done. Your defense of this behavior is puzzling to say the least.
 
WTF? In anger? The guy was an ACTIVE SHOOTER.
I did not see in any of the vids that he had discharged his weapon before Rosenbaum chased him as he was RETREATING then cornered him. Perhaps you can provide a youtube link. I couldn't find one.
Yes, you are allowed to try and take his gun away from him.
But not after chasing , then cornering him.
Previous vids show Rosenbaum (I will no longer refer to him as Angry Jew when addressing you, I understand being triggered. I'll just ask you not to mention the Vikings ;) ) had serious anger issues. Or did you not see that?
I'll repeat:
"the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself."
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/sta...tes/939/iii/48

If someone tries to grab my loaded weapon from me in anger I'm going to shoot that person every time. That's a reasonable action. Hell , it's expected.
 
Not one thing you said is relevant. Not one. Doesn't matter if the shooting of Blake was justified. It doesn't matter if there were 'rioters and looters' present. If they committed crimes, they should be arrested. Rittenhouse came to an area of civil unrest with a gun that he was not allowed to possess. He was not invited there by anyone. He killed two people with that gun, and then fled without contacting 911 or telling the police ON THE SCENE what he'd done. Your defense of this behavior is puzzling to say the least.

Cant answer the ? can u, u stupid fucking POS bastard
 
What was the DEADLY FORCE unarmed Ashli Babbitt was using at the time she was shot?

Leading a mob to attack Congressional reps and staffers behind the final barricade.

The officer would have been justified to empty his magazine into all of the Insurrectionists due to the extreme violence over almost two hours.

FWIW, I'd have emptied my magazine and reloaded at that point....and still be justified unless the fucking terrorists were running away, surrendering or laying wounded.
 
Leading a mob to attack Congressional reps and staffers behind the final barricade.

The officer would have been justified to empty his magazine into all of the Insurrectionists due to the extreme violence over almost two hours.

FWIW, I'd have emptied my magazine and reloaded at that point....and still be justified unless the fucking terrorists were running away, surrendering or laying wounded.

What was the DEADLY FORCE she was using at the time?
 
The only verified mentally ill person in this scenario was Joseph Rosenbaum.

You believe people aren't insane or mentally ill until they've been diagnosed? Is that like Trump believing if the US doesn't test for COVID, then it doesn't exist?


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-calling-it-a-double-edge-sword-idUSKBN23S0B4
U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday told thousands of cheering supporters he had asked U.S. officials to slow down testing for the novel coronavirus, calling it a “double-edged sword” that led to more cases being discovered.
 
Not one thing you said is relevant. Not one. Doesn't matter if the shooting of Blake was justified. It doesn't matter if there were 'rioters and looters' present. If they committed crimes, they should be arrested. Rittenhouse came to an area of civil unrest with a gun that he was not allowed to possess. He was not invited there by anyone. He killed two people with that gun, and then fled without contacting 911 or telling the police ON THE SCENE what he'd done. Your defense of this behavior is puzzling to say the least.

Nothing you say is relevant. What's relevant is did he act in self defense.
No vid of him discharging his weapon before rosenbaum chased and cornered him and tried to grab his gun? Hmm.

Your defense of this behavior is puzzling to say the least.
His behavior was abhorrent as was anyone's that participated in the riot. He's a needle dicked little punk looking for trouble as were the rioters.
That doesn't preclude the right to self defense.
 
What was the DEADLY FORCE she was using at the time?

Leader of mob violence. If she'd been in the back, yeah, I'd question why not shoot the leaders coming through the window...unless it was a stray round like Kyle's multiple rounds.

Don't like it? Go tell your militia friends that they are cocksucking chickenshits for not addressing those who betrayed them. Tell'em Dutch sentcha! :thup:


510cru.jpg
 
Leader of mob violence. If she'd been in the back, yeah, I'd question why not shoot the leaders coming through the window...unless it was a stray round like Kyle's multiple rounds.

Don't like it? Go tell your militia friends that they are cocksucking chickenshits for not addressing those who betrayed them. Tell'em Dutch sentcha! :thup:


510cru.jpg

And the people Kyle shot were part of a mob violence! Prosecutor already admitted he was an arsonist
 
Doesn't justify giving up right to self defense according to Wisc. law.
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/939/iii/48

But I'm sure the prosecution will bring it up. They will be grasping at what they can get.
Agreed it will be addressed.

Here's the difference. 1) You and Kyle are in a car minding your own business when a violent mob attacks you at a stop light. You have two guns and give one to Kyle. You both shoot the aggressors.

2) You and Kyle drive to Kenosha, arm yourselves with the intent of hunting down BLM protestors and "teaching them a lesson they'll never forget".

Are both cases equal or different? Why? Hint: Intent.
 
He is going to say he thought one of those guys he shot had a gun pointed at him.

If true, then this allows all Americans to shoot this violent asshole in the face. Double tap to be sure. :thub:

Same goes for any militia member aiming a gun at anyone else. Arm yourself and shoot these fuckers down. In the back is okay as long as you are defending the life of another.

Empty the magazine and reload. Dead people can't be witnesses and whine to Pedo Trump.

f98cd7345a16b845890b030d443c72e7
 
Agreed it will be addressed.

Here's the difference. 1) You and Kyle are in a car minding your own business when a violent mob attacks you at a stop light. You have two guns and give one to Kyle. You both shoot the aggressors.

2) You and Kyle drive to Kenosha, arm yourselves with the intent of hunting down BLM protestors and "teaching them a lesson they'll never forget".

Are both cases equal or different? Why? Hint: Intent.

How do you know his intent was hunting down BLM protestors and "teaching them a lesson they'll never forget".
You have a link showing that? If I remember his stated intent was to protect property from arsonists, not hunt and kill. He's a stupid kid but not stupid enough to announce he was going to Kenosha to commit murder.
 
If true, then this allows all Americans to shoot this violent asshole in the face. Double tap to be sure. :thub:

Same goes for any militia member aiming a gun at anyone else. Arm yourself and shoot these fuckers down. In the back is okay as long as you are defending the life of another.

Empty the magazine and reload. Dead people can't be witnesses and whine to Pedo Trump.

f98cd7345a16b845890b030d443c72e7

Thats a prop gun!
 
Leading a mob to attack Congressional reps and staffers behind the final barricade.

The officer would have been justified to empty his magazine into all of the Insurrectionists due to the extreme violence over almost two hours.

FWIW, I'd have emptied my magazine and reloaded at that point....and still be justified unless the fucking terrorists were running away, surrendering or laying wounded.

I would have done the same thing...there would have been dozens of bodies if I was that cop.
 
Back
Top