RNC chair: candidates must sign loyalty pledge if they want to join 2024 debates

Flash said:
It is not my paradox. The Republican Party has the problem and they are aware of it. Paradoxes are real and can't always be solved.
Click to expand...

You cannot clear your paradox by denying it, dude. You MUST clear your paradox. Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational.
 
Into the Night said:
You cannot clear your paradox by denying it, dude. You MUST clear your paradox. Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrational.
Click to expand...

I don't deny it, I stated it. The Republican Party has a paradox. They can't win with Trump and they can't win without his voters. It is a problem they cannot solve unless their nominee can attract the Trump supporters. It is not something I can solve--only observe.
 
BidenPresident said:
“Anyone getting on the Republican national committee debate stage should be able to say, ‘I will support the will of the voters and the eventual nominee of our party,’” she added.

Bash went on to play a recent Donald Trump interview clip in which the former president indicated to conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt that he was unsure whether he would support the eventual GOP nominee if it wasn’t him.

“It would have to depend on who the nominee was,” said Trump, who announced himself as a 2024 candidate in the fall.

Responding to that clip, McDaniel said, “I think they’re all going to sign” the loyalty pledge.

She added: “I really do. I think President Trump would like to be on the debate stage.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/feb/26/republican-primary-candidates-loyalty-pledge
Click to expand...

Who was it that didn't do that in 2016? Oh! Ted Cruz.

Rubio sucked it up and did what his dad told him to do! :D
 
Flash said:
I don't deny it, I stated it. The Republican Party has a paradox. They can't win with Trump and they can't win without his voters. It is a problem they cannot solve unless their nominee can attract the Trump supporters. It is not something I can solve--only observe.
Click to expand...

Inversion fallacy. You cannot clear your paradox by projection either.
 
Trump may promise to recognize the winner, but that does not mean he will. He does not respect his own words. He will still do what he wants. Trump just lies and lies.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I have supported the nominee of my party for my entire adult life,
and to my recollection,
I can't remember said nominee having EVER been my choice in a Democratic primary.
My primary choice never gets nominated because I'm really a social democrat, not a traditional, mainstream one,

I know that such looks like blind loyalty if not submissive compliance,
but remember this:

the nominee's principal opponent has always been a republican.

I can't recall my party having ever nominated a candidate as intolerable as the republican nominee.
Certainly not in MY adult lifetime.
Click to expand...

There have been some good dems that I would have supported but they never get nominated. In fact they aren't given a snowball's chance in hell. I thought Martin O'Malley was a good one.
 
Into the Night said:
WRONG. It means you are asking a question that has already been answered. It is mindless. You can't project YOUR problem on anybody else.
Click to expand...

Pretending you already answered a question is just a way to avoid dealing with an issue for which you have no evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top