Ron Paul #1

TheDanold said:
Why is that a determinant of hate? If you don't support Iraq reconstruction bills does that mean you hate the Iraqi people and their children? Likewise those who don't support giving government to other people, like lower-middle class kids does not mean they hate them either.

"I feel obliged to withhold my approval of the plan to indulge in benevolent and charitable sentiment through the appropriation of public funds … I find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution." – Grover Cleveland, 22nd and 24th US President
Click to expand...

You can sit here and deny the facts if you want to: But bottom line is Ron Paul hates black people and children. Well, poor children anyway.
 
RP seems to spport bills that support the health care industry. Not quite the same thing as supporting those who use the health care industry.
 
uscitizen said:
RP seems to spport bills that support the health care industry. Not quite the same thing as supporting those who use the health care industry.
Click to expand...

What??? You have no basis for that.

Ask yourself why, Hillary is getting boatloads of cash from the healthcare and insurance industries. Meanwhile, Paul is getting his money from individuals.
 
uscitizen said:
Paul has a clear cut pro business voting record.
Click to expand...

That's why all the corps are pouring money into his campaign. That's why he is arguing for giving individuals the tax cut for health insurance instead of businesses.

Paul has a pro liberty voting record. While liberty is good for business in general it is not so good for specific targeted businesses, while the corporate whores (aka Democrats and Republicans) dole out dollars and perks to the connected industries and businesses.
 
Well if individuals get tax cuts they will spend more in insurance premiums.

He is not for any kind of single payor or public insurance is he ?
 
Watermark said:
:P

While most Republicans made the vote out of hatred for children, Paul did it because he has an extremely limited view of government power.

I think he'd probably oppose it on state level. But he really, truly believes that if we didn't have all these government programs and interference that it would simply be far easier to buy health insurance for your children. It isn't simply because he doesn't want poor children to have healthcare.
Click to expand...

His view isn't limited. He believes government should be limited. I'll smack the difference into you if you need further explanation.
 
Last edited:
uscitizen said:
Well if individuals get tax cuts they will spend more in insurance premiums.

He is not for any kind of single payor or public insurance is he ?
Click to expand...

Well, if you think about it, any business that seeks to establish itself in America will be expected to pay for America's rabidly inflated medical prices, at a cost of about 10% more than they would pay in other countries. And since France's universal system takes up about as much of its budget as medicare and medicaid take up of ours, no, we don't make it up in lower taxes.
 
Watermark said:
His view is that government should be limited, AssHat. Learn English.
Click to expand...

You said he had a limited view of government. He doesn't. he has a view of limited government. You were applying the adjective to the wrong word. Learn to write.
 
uscitizen said:
Well if individuals get tax cuts they will spend more in insurance premiums.
Click to expand...

The premiums are already inflated from the tax cuts to employers, so what's the difference? This removes the tie between employment and insurance, so that insurance travels with the individual, as it should.

uscitizen said:
He is not for any kind of single payor or public insurance is he ?
Click to expand...

Hell no. That will only make things worse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top