Rudy releases repair receipt

AProudLefty said:
So basically there's nothing to compare it to?
Click to expand...

attachment.php


Yep. Topologically they are identical. Strokewise he was probably stoned on one of them.
 
ExpressLane said:
look a the line down from the left vertical leg to the bottom of the right vertical leg then the triangular line to transition to the horizontal bar of the H. They are made the same way in both signatures.
Click to expand...

Yes, but it's easier to notice that both signatures are topologically identical.

1. From the starting point in the initial P, the stroke descends in a concave-upward curve to the base of the P in both signatures.
2. From the base of the initial P, the stroke ascends in a concave-downward curve up the left side and around the top in both signatures.
3. At the right extreme of the P, the stroke returns to concave-upward to the initial stroke (line 1) in both signatures.
4. From there, the stroke remains concave-upward to the top of the left-top point of the H in both signatures.
5. Stroke is concave-upward from the top left to the bottom left of the H in both signatures.
6. Stroke is concave-upwards from the bottom left of the H to the top right point of the H in both signatures.
7. Stroke is concave-downwards from the right top of the H to the bottom right of the H in both signatures.
8. The triangular concave-downwards leg across the H is, as you noticed, the same in both signatures.
9. The remainder of the signature is squiggle of identical concavity in both signatures.

Ergo, both signatures are topologically equivalent in their entirety. The swings of the strokes vary well within standard human error and variance ... even if Hunter had not been stoned.
 
IBDaMann said:
Yes, but it's easier to notice that both signatures are topologically identical.

1. From the starting point in the initial P, the stroke descends in a concave-upward curve to the base of the P in both signatures.
2. From the base of the initial P, the stroke ascends in a concave-downward curve up the left side and around the top in both signatures.
3. At the right extreme of the P, the stroke returns to concave-upward to the initial stroke (line 1) in both signatures.
4. From there, the stroke remains concave-upward to the top of the left-top point of the H in both signatures.
5. Stroke is concave-upward from the top left to the bottom left of the H in both signatures.
6. Stroke is concave-upwards from the bottom left of the H to the top right point of the H in both signatures.
7. Stroke is concave-downwards from the right top of the H to the bottom right of the H in both signatures.
8. The triangular concave-downwards leg across the H is, as you noticed, the same in both signatures.
9. The remainder of the signature is squiggle of identical concavity in both signatures.

Ergo, both signatures are topologically equivalent in their entirety. The swings of the strokes vary well within standard human error and variance ... even if Hunter had not been stoned.
Click to expand...
The first letter is an R not a P
 
Legion said:
I'd need a forensic specialist to look at that.
Click to expand...

There are two approaches to this matter:

1. Your position of establishing admissability in a court of law. There's nothing wrong with that.
2. My position of being a rational, intelligent adult who isn't going to let anyone do his thinking for him. Just applying common sense I can readily see that it is exceedingly improbable that two separate people, even having practiced, could independently make those signatures. See my notes on concavity. Of course, I don't believe that Hunter Biden has anyone practicing his signature just to add plausible deniability in such cases.

Ergo, I personally am convinced. If I were on a jury I would be convinced they are both Hunter's signature.
 
christiefan915 said:
Speculation leaves the door open for alternate viewpoints. trump and his numbskull followers are the ones taking this dubious info as gospel.
Click to expand...
There will be an investigation, you can be sure of that.

This isn’t going to make a difference in the vote. It isn’t 2016 and Biden isn’t Hillary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top