What is the point of posting an article originally published seven years ago? I get the sense that Desh doesn't like Rush and was seeking an opportunity to smear him. Not being overly familiar with Desh and his/her posts and politics I am left to ask, is my impression correct and, if so, is the same true of his/her attitude towards all Republicans/conservatives?
Seven years? Really? Could you perhaps try finding something that holds some sort of relevance to the world today?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/06/27/national/main1753947.shtml
which one caused his deafness the oxycontin or the viagra?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/06/27/national/main1753947.shtml
which one caused his deafness the oxycontin or the viagra?
That is the new part of this story.
Viagra may cause sudden deafness.
Rush was on both Oxycontin and Viagra.
He was found with large quantities of Viagra and trying to visit the dominican republic ,his name wasnt even on the bottle.
Ha, good thing it's not sudden-onset blindness. Last thing you want is to be with a suddenly blind guy with a hard-on... you never know where it might end up.
That would have been a great article to post originally instead of making us guess what you are trying to say or thinking you were posting some partisan diatribe.
You were the only one who freaked out about it Cawacko. What seems to be the problem today? Feeling a little stiff? What you need is a Homedics, heated shiatsu massage chair. And some Sambuca.
Trust me. You will feel goooood.
I think its a very important subject we discuss. I haven't used Viagra yet but I'm not afraid to if I need it. I want to know what the odds are I'll go deaf because I'll still take it.
An important topic like this does not need worthless Rush Limbaugh discussion to preface it. Get to the point!