Based Chad
Was it me?
Thank your for recognizing my verbiage as current policy. Finally, Im getting the respect I deserve.
Sarah Palin Endorses Rand Paul for U.S. Senate
- Thread starter Adam Weinberg
- Start date
Thank your for recognizing my verbiage as current policy. Finally, Im getting the respect I deserve.
Adam Weinberg
Goldwater Republican
Yes, but I'm not going to, realistically, and I don't think Ron Paul should run for President in 2012 anyway. I think he should lend his endorsement and base to someone who will build the movement past Ron Paul's critical mass. Even if they lose, if they expand the movement and lose for the right reasons, it will be a good long term investment.
He is not Ralph Nader, it's about his ideas, and not him, and that is the reason I would not want him to run again.
You're right that being correct doesn't mean you will win. But if you've noticed since after the Presidential election that the currency of Ron Paul's ideas and message are stronger than they've ever been in the Republican Party in a long time in the face of "Obamunism".
In a way, I think Ron Paul even won the election, the votes just haven't been fully counted yet.
Movement building and developing the core of a movement is a matter bigger than one election.
Adam Weinberg
Goldwater Republican
We're all liberals compared to the Communists and the Nazis, but they were not conservatives. They overtook and dramatically altered or abolished the systems of government in their country to achieve their ends.
That is not a conservative idea.
Based Chad
Was it me?
it's fascist idea. And neocons and liberals are all about it.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Funny, you have about the same view of Ron Paul as I have regarding Palin. It is also interesting how their political paths have a striking similarity, with regard to media-driven perceptions versus the actual person and their ideas. Ironically enough, I believe they would make a good combination politically, perhaps a winning combination. Whether their 'politics' mesh all the way down the line, is not really important, as we all vary on our personal opinions to some degree. I can see this as more of a realistic possibility than you, because I honestly think there isn't a lot of difference in libertarian conservatives and social conservatives, with regard to what they want government actually involved in and actively working for. There is a lot in common with Tea Party..Palin..Paul..Libertarian.. groups, and some amalgamation of those various support bases, makes for a viable political force to be reckoned with in Washington.
Just a thought.
Based Chad
Was it me?
Adam just sees paul as a convenient political aggregator, who he feels should eventually turn his followers over to some other sold out fascist shitfucker.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
And you're a fascist shitfucker who prefers to promote total and complete anarchy as opposed to anything currently on either political horizon left or right! Correct?