SARAH SANDERS KICKED OUT OF VIRGINIA RESTURAUNT.

Legion said:
I thought liberals believed that business owners have to serve all customers, regardless of their moral beliefs.

Does that just apply to bakers? :dunno:
Click to expand...

What protected group does Ms Sanders belong to?
Was she tossed out because of her gender or was she shown the door because of her insane religious superstitions?
Or was she given the boot because she is a professional liar for Daffy Dawn, my brother.
Being given the bum's rush isn't illegal, is it.
 
Last edited:
Leonthecat said:
What protected group does Ms Sanders belong to? Was she tossed out because of her gender or her religious superstitions? Or was she given the boot because she is an immoral liar, my brother.
Click to expand...

Is there supposed to be a "protected group", dear Brother?

She was asked to leave because her presence reportedly outraged the deeply-help beliefs of the owner.
 
Nomad said:
In case you two zeros or any of your zero friends and fellow cultists haven't figured it out yet, we just don't give a flying fuck.

Under Trump, nothing matters anymore.

Conservative women like Hunkabutt Sanders and all her fellow braindead Trump cows deserve every insult and demeaning comment they get.

And worse.
Click to expand...

There we go, that's what I've been waiting on.

Finally dropping that faux compassion and supposed caring and all those false proclamations, regarding caring about how women are treated, was just a load of BS being shoveled.

Good job, poser. :good4u:

I wonder how many of the defenders of women are going to either thank you or denounce you.

Probably a few of the former and none of the latter. :palm:
 
Legion said:
Nobody is arguing that the restaurant owner did anything illegal, are they, dear Brother?
Click to expand...

Right implied that it is a feminist issue, dear brother. As though there was a case for gender discrimination :dunno:
USFREEDUMB implied the act had legal parody with gay wedding cakes.
I think they would like it if the business owner could be held guilty of breaking some law.
 
Leonthecat said:
Right implied that it is a feminist issue, dear brother. As though there was a case for gender discrimination. I think they would like it if the business owner could be held guilty of breaking some law.
Click to expand...

Mrs. Sanders is not complaining AFAIK, and fRight said nothing about the legality of the Red Hen's actions, did he, dear Brother?
 
Buckly said:
Right implied that it is a feminist issue, dear brother. As though there was a case for gender discrimination :dunno:
USFREEDUMB implied the act had legal parody with gay wedding cakes.
I think they would like it if the business owner could be held guilty of breaking some law.
Click to expand...

OH - please show where I made such an implication, unless you're just a lying sack of shit; but then, I digress. :D
 
Legion said:
Is there supposed to be a "protected group", dear Brother?

She was asked to leave because her presence reportedly outraged the deeply-help beliefs of the owner.
Click to expand...

Well brother, you seemed to think liberals believed that business owners have to serve all customers, regardless of their moral beliefs.
I am just clarifying who I believe the law protects.
 
Leonthecat said:
Well brother, you seemed to think liberals believed that business owners have to serve all customers, regardless of their moral beliefs. I am just clarifying who I believe the law protects.
Click to expand...

Beliefs and law are not synonymous terms, dear Brother.
 
kudzu said:
Its not a feminist issue.. She's a self professed Christian who lies every day and defends Trump's behavior .
Click to expand...

The restaurant owner can discriminate based on religion or creed?

Do those who think the baker should be forced to make the cake think the owner should be forced to serve Sarah?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top