Science can't answer these questions
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
Into the Night
Verified User
Newton did not explain gravity. He simply accepted it as a force.
The fact that we can study biology, the brain, human behavior is empirical knowledge.
It doesn't answer the questions in the OP. Those are highly subjective ethical questions. Science operates in the realm of the objective and empirical. There is no science of subjectivity, though maybe we need to invent one.
I didn't say anything about Newton explaining gravity, dummy.
You are hallucinating again.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Nobody is making you read my posts.
Into the Night
Verified User
Blatant lie. Don't try to deny your own posts, Sock.
Into the Night
Verified User
Science does not use any subjectivity. It is purely objective.
BidenPresident
Verified User
Nor you read mine. No, wait. You do believe your brain makes you do things without your control.
Your thinker is broken, troll. I challenge you to link to the post I supposedly wrote Newton explained gravity.
Failure to provide a link will be taken as an admission you lied your flabby ass off
evince
Truthmatters
Why not?
evince
Truthmatters
Ethical questions are created by us
They have a scientific basis for existing
It’s called survival
evince
Truthmatters
Life is meaningful if you let it be
Embracing this fascinating ecosystem full of life and perpetuating it out of love of others
Our environment created us this way
We invented god
Not the other way around
Into the Night
Verified User
Don't try to deny your own posts, Sock. ANYONE can read them.
Into the Night
Verified User
Science is not ethics, philosophy, or religion, Sock.
Into the Night
Verified User
I understand your religion is the Church of No God. You have made this obvious before.
The choices Alexei Navalny made had nothing to do with survival, and in fact brought great personal risk to himself and his family.
The fact that we know apples fall from trees does nothing scientifically to explain what gravity is.
The fact that we have biology, brains, and emotions does nothing to provide scientific answers to the questions in the OP.
People knew ten thousand years ago that humans shared biological characteristics with animals, that humans had emotions, that humans made choices. That was thousands of years before science.
Observations in and of themselves are not science. Science is a series of laws or principles that can make accurate predictions and certainly involves measurements and quantification. There is no scientific law that proves the life choice of the ascetic Daoist monk is inferior to materialistic investment banker, or vice versa
I agree with the sentiment in principle.
But it's just opinion, it's not science. There's nothing scientifically that neccesarily says a life devoted to pleasurable experience and personal fulfillment is better or worse than a life devoted to service and self sacrifice
Your failure to provide a link supporting what you claimed I said is taken as a confession you lied your fat ass off about what I supposedly said.
Into the Night
Verified User
Attempted negative proof fallacy. Don't try to deny your own posts, Sock. Anyone can read them.