Science from the other side of Climate Change

I'm not ignoring anything.
Blatant lie. You ignore the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, Kirchoff's law, and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
I'm just asking a simple question about energy coming to and going out of the earth's atmosphere, one that you are claiming you answered but haven't.
Blatant lie. RQAA.
Oh, wait... I forgot... your views on the atmosphere are science denier stuff.

I've gotta remember that.
Inversion fallacy. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!
 
You may have missed the point. Since they're autistic (not sure if that's exactly the right medical term) their conceptual frameworks are cross linked across abstraction layers in an incoherent way. They can't perform useful logic outside of narrow scopes.

There is no way to explain it to them. Zen and Gardner are utterly wasting their time.
Well, then don't explain it to them. Explain it to the rest of this forum instead.
 
Back
Top