Into the Night
Verified User
Yup. Science, of course, is NEVER settled.This is one of my favorite climate change disaster FUBARs. The science is settled is the refrain we always hear isnt it?
Yup. Science, of course, is NEVER settled.This is one of my favorite climate change disaster FUBARs. The science is settled is the refrain we always hear isnt it?
2020.if was all supposed to be gone.
When it's not gone we haven't listen to idiots explain away how stupid you are. This reminds me of you atheist twits making fun of people who predict the end of the world.
Damn. I missed that boat.You're too late!!
In 1985, Democrats were claiming the world was going to end in 20 years.
She never said that.It’s all irrelevant actually.
In January 2019 Alexandria Occasional-Cortex said the world ends in 12 years. That gives us about 6 more until doomsday.
I’ve already made my final arrangements .
She never said that.
They said it would be gone by 2020. It wasn't. You know why? Because they are self absorbed assholes who don't actually give a shit about climate change. In other words, leftistsNope. Scientists don't claim to know with that level of precision what is going to happen when in regards to climate change.
I see you simply chose to ignore the link I provided which EXPLAINS how the scientists assess the future. Probably because you knew it would be impossible for you to understand given your limitations.
Except the SCIENTISTS aren't making the predictions you latch onto. Those are pop-sci journalists looking for an easy headline and given your inability to understand science you don't think to check for yourself and even if you did you wouldn't understand what you read.
Keep the hell up boyWhat would be gone by 2020?
So you don't know?Keep the hell up boy
Sure I do I just don't feel compelled to be your fucking nannySo you don't know?
Your continued dishonesty is noted. Thanks for confirming.The atmosphere is part of Earth, Void. No gas or vapor has the capability to create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Fallacy fallacy.
I never said the atmosphere created energy. You are continuing to be dishonest or are just scientifically ignorant.You are still trying to ignore the 1st law of thermodynamics. No gas or vapor or atmosphere can create energy out of nothing. You are also now ignoring Kirchoff's law. The atmosphere is part of Earth.
Your religion is not science, Twilight. Climate cannot change. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.Nope. Scientists don't claim to know with that level of precision what is going to happen when in regards to climate change.
Science is not prophecy, Twilight.I see you simply chose to ignore the link I provided which EXPLAINS how the scientists assess the future.
I understand your religion quite well, Twilight. You deny theories of science, you deny mathematics, and you deny the English language.Probably because you knew it would be impossible for you to understand given your limitations.
Your religion is not science, Twilight.Except the SCIENTISTS aren't making the predictions you latch onto. Those are pop-sci journalists looking for an easy headline and given your inability to understand science you don't think to check for yourself and even if you did you wouldn't understand what you read.
Damn. I missed that boat.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS OR THE HISTORY OF YOUR RELIGION!You can try to explain that NO ONE said the world was going to end in 12 years, but they won't understand.
Throwing shit at a fan doesn't really work. It just stops the fan.The talking point they are talking about was that some scientists believed that within 12 years we might pass a tipping point or two without even realizing it thus meaning that LATER when the shit did start hitting the fan we would be too late.
Blatant lie.But NO ONE said the world was going to end in 12 years.
MAGA isn't a person, Twilight.That's just the MAGA folks and their lack of ability to read.
Theories of science are not dishonesty, Void. You just want to ignore them.Your continued dishonesty is noted. Thanks for confirming.
Blatant lie.I never said the atmosphere created energy.
Inversion fallacy.You are continuing to be dishonest or are just scientifically ignorant.
RQAAHere....I'll make this easy. Let's see if you can muster enough honesty to answer a simple question. All you have to type is one of two words. Agree or disagree.
Ready? Here we go!
Without an atmosphere, the lowest temps on earth would be around -200 and highs would be over 200 degrees. Do you agree or disagree?
Okay. Let me know when you stop being dishonest and/or scientifically ignorant.Blatant lie.
Inversion fallacy.
RQAA
Inversion fallacy. It is YOU ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics, Void. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!Okay. Let me know when you stop being dishonest and/or scientifically ignorant.
You are ignoring science by denying the impact of the Earth's atmosphere on high and low temperatures.Inversion fallacy. It is YOU ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics, Void. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!