Daylight63
Verified User
Perhaps you would like to tell the class how little science education you have. Hmmmm?
Science from the other side of Climate Change
- Thread starter ZenMode
- Start date
Perhaps you would like to tell the class how little science education you have. Hmmmm?
Diogenes
1 account to rule them all
I'm not in the habit of posting claims I cant substantiate, unlike yourself.
Daylight63
Verified User
You are not worthy of actual thoughtful response. Please accept this in lieu thereof:
Diogenes
1 account to rule them all
Keep telling yourself that. I suppose that's how you justify being unable to provide one. Cope.
Daylight63
Verified User
You are not worth a thoughtful response. Please accept this in lieu thereof:
Diogenes
1 account to rule them all
Diogenes
1 account to rule them all
As far as I am aware, there is no observational data to support the claim that we are facing an existential humanitarian crisis due to climate change.
Despite a lack of empirical evidence to support such profound statements, some alarmists claim that more and more people are being killed by “climate-driven” extreme weather events such as heatwaves, tropical cyclones, droughts and floods each year because of our “addiction” to fossil fuels.
What's more, some alarmists maintain that “climate-fueled” heat and drought are taking a toll on agriculture, which is increasing famine and food scarcity.
However, a close examination of the data reveal that not one of these popular averments appear to be true.
𝐀𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐝:
• Africa: +131.8% (2011-20 vs. 1925)
• Americas: +116.9% (2011-20 vs. 1850)
• Asia: +165.8% (2011-20 vs. 1885)
• Europe: +115.0% (2011-20 vs. 1850)
• Oceania: +124.9% (2011-20 vs. 1870)
ourworldindata.org
Despite a lack of empirical evidence to support such profound statements, some alarmists claim that more and more people are being killed by “climate-driven” extreme weather events such as heatwaves, tropical cyclones, droughts and floods each year because of our “addiction” to fossil fuels.
What's more, some alarmists maintain that “climate-fueled” heat and drought are taking a toll on agriculture, which is increasing famine and food scarcity.
However, a close examination of the data reveal that not one of these popular averments appear to be true.
𝐀𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐝:
• Africa: +131.8% (2011-20 vs. 1925)
• Americas: +116.9% (2011-20 vs. 1850)
• Asia: +165.8% (2011-20 vs. 1885)
• Europe: +115.0% (2011-20 vs. 1850)
• Oceania: +124.9% (2011-20 vs. 1870)
Life Expectancy
People are living longer across the world, but large differences remain. Explore global data on life expectancy and how it has changed over time.
ourworldindata.org
Daylight63
Verified User
And you've yet to provide one. Keep trying, though.
Your post is irrelevant to anything in the world. I hope you will accept this consolation prize for having wasted both your electrons and the electrons in my computer screen.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
When you are ready to go toe-to-toe on science, I'm here for you.
Diogenes
1 account to rule them all
You can wait.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You can say that again. There is no "The Data" and there is no "The Scientists."
As the world's population continues to increase, more and more people die each year, in all categories. Yup, that's a true statement.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I apologize, I intended to respond to Daylight63 but mistakenly responded in your post to you. I will correct.
Diogenes
1 account to rule them all
Diogenes
1 account to rule them all
ZenMode
Well-known member
Why wouldn't they be meaningful?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
If you'd like to go toe-to-toe on science, I'm here for you.
You have a few holes in your understanding. It would appear that you believe the Stefan-Boltzmann has an atmospheric composition parameter, and that atmospheric gases affect a body's average equilibrium temperature. They don't.
You are correct that glass is not transparent to infrared. In fact, glass is very opaque across the entire IR band. Nonetheless, greenhouses work by restricting airflow, thus restricting convection.
Daylight63
Verified User
Then you'll be more than happy to address the technically detailed posts I made just up a few here on this thread.
No. I never said anything as stupid as that. Why would you think I said that?????
See, if you can't even READ then you can't debate me on science. It's pretty much that simple.
Yes the atmospheric gases affect the earth's surface temperature. That's why you and I can survive on the surface comfortably.
LOL. Sorry. No.
Please READ some science and try peppering your usual spew with something like either supporting evidence for your bizarre claims.
In 4.7 billion years, there has only ever been one constant to the climate of earth - change.
What we "deny" because there isn't a shred of evidence to support your claims, is that you can control the atmosphere or climate of the planet. Not only is there zero evidence to support your boast that you can control the climate, there is 50 years of evidence that you are utterly full of shit.
The real stupidity is thinking that the hoi polloi having enough to eat an air conditioning is changing the climate. A mixture of hubris and ignorance in utter defiance of scientific methodology and ignorance.
What impacts the climate of planet earth 99% is that big yellow ball in the sky.
But no one is getting hundred billion dollar grants to say solar variations drive the macro-climate.
What does that have to do with you?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Frankly, you posted a lot of gibber-babble. Just answer me a couple fo questions about what you believe.
Do you believe that earth's average global equilibrium temperature is somehow increasing?
Do you believe that the earth has a global climate?
These questions should be too easy to answer, and they'll serve as a good starting point for discussion.
I didn't say that you said it; I said it is your position, as confirmed by this statement:
This statement implies that your position is what I wrote. Sadly, it also shows that you are a fraud. You aren't a PhD in physics or in any relevant science to this subject matter. You are clearly scientifically illiterate and you have no idea what Stefan-Boltzmann states.
I'll officially start by offering to answer any questions you might have on the matter.
It would appear that you are trying to get by on claims of "credentials" backed by gibberish. There is no stimulating or challenging conversation on science to be had with you. You don't know how things work.