Science from the other side of Climate Change

I've said many times that I don't know if they (ITTN/IBDM) are trolling, dishonest or just uninformed. Either way, I know it's one of those three which is why it doesn't tear me down and it's ultimately, just a matter of time before they are exposed, which is what has happened.

"Scientists aren't science! Scientists aren't science! Scientists aren't science!..."

(3 seconds later)

"Here are all these scientific laws that I believe support my position, which came from scientists."
Science isn't scientists. A theory of science stands on it's own. It doesn't matter where it comes from. You just want to ignore them.
 
There is no other side to climate change. Climatologists scientists and other pros say it is real and a problem. Outliers do not deserve equal footing.
Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Climate cannot change. Go learn English. Climatology is not a branch of science.

The Church of Global Warming (and you) deny and ignore the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
 
Science isn't 'measurements', Sybil.

Hmmm, interesting.


It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, the global atmospheric content of CO2, the pH of the ocean, the temperature of the ocean, or the total snow and ice on Earth.

YOu are SO VERY SMART. Let me counter your insight with this:
pHDtpZJ.jpg
 
Uh, no. It's just a fact that the US literally can't impact the climate situation, if there is one, without countries like China and India onboard. Even then, we likely can't do enough to make a significant difference.

Again, all that, including your political rhetoric and craziness, is completely separate from the science. It's absolutely possible that man-made climate change is real and we can't do a thing about it. It's also possible that MMCC doesn't exist and we're all wasting our time and money trying to fix a non-issue.
Climate cannot change, Void. Go learn English.
 
Back
Top