Science from the other side of Climate Change

[ADreamOfLiberty]

How does one debate science?

See that is what I mean. You can't debate scientific subjects with someone who doesn't know what debate is and/or can't comprehend English.

Do you have any controversial or cutting edge engineering positions that you wish to debate?

If I did, I would not waste my time trying to debate them with you. Mr. "have you looked into rigging" pfft

 

[Into the Night]

BS. Your claim is that climate can't change because there is no measurement for "climate".

So what is 'changing', Void? I give you ANOTHER fair chance. Take it. No Holy Links. No cut and paste. Give me YOUR answer.

 

[Into the Night]

You dunce! Who the fuck do you think discovered the science behind Kirchoff 's law?

Hint....it was a SCIENTIST! His name was....wait for it....KIRCHOFF!

Again.... you're embarrassing yourself, over and over and over.

Kirchoff did not discover anything. He simply formulated the law.

 

[Daylight63]

LIF. Grow up.

Hmmmm, very interesting conjecture there, Doctor! I haven't thought of it that way. Let me counter with this:

 

[Into the Night]

See that is what I mean. You can't debate scientific subjects with someone who doesn't know what debate is and/or can't comprehend English.



If I did, I would not waste my time trying to debate them with you. Mr. "have you looked into rigging" pfft

Science isn't a debate. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Consensus is not used in science. There is no voting bloc in science. Science has no politics.

 

[Daylight63]

Brilliant point.

Thank you! I had figured it was about your speed. RIght up your alley.

Now as to the many other points you so cogently raised, let me respond thusly:

 

[Into the Night]

Hmmmm, very interesting conjecture there, Doctor! I haven't thought of it that way. Let me counter with this:

Random phrase. No apparent coherency.

 

[Daylight63]

Science isn't a debate. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Consensus is not used in science. There is no voting bloc in science. Science has no politics.

SCIENCE ISN'T SCIENCE! AND THE SCIENCE IT ISN'T ISN'T EVEN THE SCIENCE! BECAUSE NOTHING IS ANYTHING AND HENCEFORT NOTHING IS NOTHING AS WELL BUT IT"S REALLY NOT NOTHING IT'S SOMETHING BUT THAT SOMETHING IS NOTHING!

 

[Daylight63]

Random phrase. No apparent coherency.

I see. And what do you think about this? I find it MOST convincing on MANY fronts. I believe that it accounts for all the dangly bits as well!

See if you agree!

 

[ZenMode]

Kirchoff did not discover anything. He simply formulated the law.

More word games. I don't give a shit how you describe his work. He was a scientist.

So, as with IBDM, you selectively link scientists to science. When? When it aligns with your politics.

You are a joke.

 

[Into the Night]

SCIENCE ISN'T SCIENCE!

Paradox. Irrational.

AND THE SCIENCE IT ISN'T ISN'T EVEN THE SCIENCE!

Science isn't scientists. Science is completely atheistic. Scientists, being people are generally religious.

BECAUSE NOTHING IS ANYTHING AND HENCEFORT NOTHING IS NOTHING AS WELL BUT IT"S REALLY NOT NOTHING IT'S SOMETHING BUT THAT SOMETHING IS NOTHING!

Your word games isn't going to work, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

More word games.

LIF. Grow up.

I don't give a shit how you describe his work. He was a scientist.

So, as with IBDM, you selectively link scientists to science. When? When it aligns with your politics.

You are a joke.

Science isn't scientists. Science has no politics. Science has no religion. Science is completely atheistic. Scientists have political viewpoints and most are religious.

You are still desperately attempting to ignore several theories of science.

 

[Into the Night]

You are ignoring science by denying the impact of the Earth's atmosphere on high and low temperatures.

High and low temperatures are not Earth's temperature, Void. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You are still playing word games and denying the 1st law of thermodynamics.

 

[IBDaMann]

Why would I trust the opinion of a race car driver as it relates to ice ages?

Because you have indicated that you allow entire classes of people do your thinking for you about subject matter they do not know. As such, race car drivers can only speculate and fantasize about the unobserved past, just like scientists and consular officials.

The better question is why you are so desperate to have others of particular classes tell you what about their areas of ignorance you are to fantasize and to speculate, and to presume it all as being true. Personally, I think it's a stupid thing for you to do, and I would never allow it to happen to me.

Do you go to your financial advisor for medical advice? If not, why?

Do you seek out specific classes of people to tell you what to believe about what they don't know? Answer: Yes, you do.

 

[IBDaMann]

So, as with IBDM, you selectively link scientists to science.

Neither Into the Night nor I point to people. You do that. In fact, it's all you do. You never point to any science. You only point to the clergy of your religion who tell you what to believe.

Into the Night and I only point to science, math, logic and observation in the forming of rational bases. People don't come into play.

 

[Daylight63]

Paradox. Irrational.

Fallacy of the Bumble Fuck. Mantra Lameo 45a

Science isn't scientists.

NOTHING IS ANYTHING! IT IS ALL NOTHING! NOTHING IS WHAT IT IS OR ISN"T! IT JUST ISN'T!!!!

Science is completely atheistic. Scientists, being people are generally religious.

OOOOOOh, now INto is getting "philosophical"! What a brilliant mind! We are SO LUCKY to have you here!

Your word games isn't going to work, Sybil.

Glumbleton thorpe twaddle. If Glubulon grings the retroclumbula then returgy fun fun!

 

[ZenMode]

High and low temperatures are not Earth's temperature, Void. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You are still playing word games and denying the 1st law of thermodynamics.

Again, you are denying that the Earth's atmosphere has any impact on high and low temperatures on Earth.

 

[ZenMode]

Because you have indicated that you allow entire classes of people do your thinking for you about subject matter they do not know. As such, race car drivers can only speculate and fantasize about the unobserved past, just like scientists and consular officials.

The better question is why you are so desperate to have others of particular classes tell you what about their areas of ignorance you are to fantasize and to speculate, and to presume it all as being true. Personally, I think it's a stupid thing for you to do, and I would never allow it to happen to me.

Do you seek out specific classes of people to tell you what to believe about what they don't know? Answer: Yes, you do.

"Because you have indicated that you allow entire classes of people do your thinking for you about subject matter they do not know. "


Classes of people = scientists.

Who do you think came up with the laws you wrongly cling to?

 

[ZenMode]

Neither Into the Night nor I point to people. You do that. In fact, it's all you do. You never point to any science. You only point to the clergy of your religion who tell you what to believe.

Into the Night and I only point to science, math, logic and observation in the forming of rational bases. People don't come into play.

"Neither Into the Night nor I point to people. "

Who do you think came up with the laws that you cling to? Do you think they drifted down from the heavens on gold plates?

 

[IBDaMann]

Again, you are denying that the Earth's atmosphere has any impact on high and low temperatures on Earth.

Nope. You are pivoting away from the rebuttal that kills your argument and that exposes you for the absolutely scientifically illiterate moron that you are. You have been debunked long since.

You had one job: explain the rational basis for your WACKY religious belief, i.e. how a mere gas could cause the spontaneous increase of earth's average global equilibrium temperature, without violating physics, math or logic.

Obviously you couldn't, so you pivoted to some lame, irrelevant question and began chanting it. Get back to your one job, i.e. answer the question and support your affirmative argument.