science proves human effected GW

It as proven long ago. Problem is that either of 2 options makes sense. If we take it seriously and do our best to fight global warming, we may save the planet. If we are wrong and man does not contribute, we will have cleaner air, land and water. The only mistake, is not doing anything.
 
"We Must Do Something!!!" People seem to spend a lot of time not doing anything but advocating for policies that would exacerbate carbon output. More Consumption=More Carbon Release. It is that simple.
 
Kacper said:
"We Must Do Something!!!" People seem to spend a lot of time not doing anything but advocating for policies that would exacerbate carbon output. More Consumption=More Carbon Release. It is that simple.
Click to expand...

People do plenty. It is governments controlled by corporations that are slow walking and fighting it. Lots of people are buying into alternative energy and electric cars. There are cities working on going green. However, one political party in the US fights green energy with all they have. Can you guess which one that is?
 
Nordberg said:
People do plenty. It is governments controlled by corporations that are slow walking and fighting it. Lots of people are buying into alternative energy and electric cars. There are cities working on going green. However, one political party in the US fights green energy with all they have. Can you guess which one that is?
Click to expand...

What is the carbon footprint of building an electric car? What is the carbon footprint of charging stations?
 
Русский агент;2808315 said:
Tell the forum what you're doing to live the green life. If the answer is "nothing much," I'll understand.
Click to expand...

If I said nothiing or not much. I would be lying. But of course, you will define it as an unreachable goal. I know how that game is played. SO I am not playing.
 
Kacper said:
What is the carbon footprint of building an electric car? What is the carbon footprint of charging stations?
Click to expand...

It is so much more than that. But of course, they don't belch carbon into the atmosphere. That means fewer health problems and less dirt. That is another bonus. Solar and wind are so much cleanert too.
Building cars? Oh OK, Manufacturing is a messy process. But it is messy building ICES and the huge vans and trucks with massive motors that so many love. Many manufacturers and support companies are going solar and green in ther facilities too, The future is green even though you do not want to participate.
 
Last edited:
Cypress said:
One of Jimmy Carter's lasting legacy's was his vision for alternative energy and reducing reliance on dirty fossil fuels.
A lot of rightwingers and a lot of other people thought it was funny that Carter put solar panels on the white house. I really don't think it looks that funny now.

On this issue of alternative energy, Carter was way ahead of his time and actually quite prescient.

In fact, in a few decades when rich Republican's houses on Carolina's outer banks are being flooded, we will be hearing some of them wail "Why didn't we listen to Jimmy Carter??!"
Click to expand...

According to Al Gore, the flooding should have already happened. Guess when your hoax "science" doesn't occur like you claimed, you change the science. You idiots are worse than those that predict the end of times.
 
we know you hate science

and math

and history


its why your party has turned into a circus run by brainless, fat, orange clown
 
Русский агент;2808315 said:
Tell the forum what you're doing to live the green life. If the answer is "nothing much," I'll understand.
Click to expand...

Lots. I have been conscientious for many years of a smaller footprint. My family is also doing what we can. You are admitting you don't care. That is no surprise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top