It happened in 1989. Stop living in the DISTANT FUCKING PAST.
Meanwhile, a white mother violently murdered by BLM terrorists for suggesting actual equality (all lives matter) instead of lunatic racist bullshit...near total media blackout.
Science rejects Dems' delusional mutilation of children to encourage mental illness
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
It happened in 1989. Stop living in the DISTANT FUCKING PAST.
Meanwhile, a white mother violently murdered by BLM terrorists for suggesting actual equality (all lives matter) instead of lunatic racist bullshit...near total media blackout.
What's worse is using a Democrat "fact-checker" to prop up logic that isn't even valid in the first place (his 'attack the source' fallacy).
He's not worth talking to. He's a troll.
christiefan915
Catalyst
It happened in 1989. Stop living in the DISTANT FUCKING PAST.
Meanwhile, a white mother violently murdered by BLM terrorists for suggesting actual equality (all lives matter) instead of lunatic racist bullshit...near total media blackout.
You must be drinking. The article I'm referring to is from the Indy Star and it's about Jessica Whitaker's death in Indianapolis.
Go sleep it off and come back if and when your head clears.
You must be drinking. The article I'm referring to is from the Indy Star and it's about Jessica Whitaker's death in Indianapolis.
Go sleep it off and come back if and when your head clears.
Yes, you abruptly changing the subject without warning is ME being off.
WHY are you bringing up this random other case no one was talking about?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Yes, you abruptly changing the subject without warning is ME being off.
WHY are you bringing up this random other case no one was talking about?
The "random other case" Y O U hyperlinked in post 34?
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Ah, so now we're CLINGING to this tired old bullshit game. DESPERATE to avoid the topic here, aren't you.
You're the one who called me a Democrat. Are you pivoting now?
The "random other case" Y O U hyperlinked in post 34?
Well yeah, and for five posts before your response, we were talking about the Central Park Five.
Silly me for not knowing you were changing subjects back to something from earlier.
I will keep doing it, because it's 99% true. And you will keep tossing up this dishonest diversionary smokescreen to avoid what's being debated. That's YOU deflecting, not me, dishonest demagogue.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
I will keep doing it, because it's 99% true. And you will keep tossing up this dishonest diversionary smokescreen to avoid what's being debated. That's YOU deflecting, not me, dishonest demagogue.
You called me a Democrat, but you don't want to defend your statement, so you're accusing me of diversion. That's not very cash money of you.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Dozy bint never swims beyond the shallows!
Of course I did. 99% of your views are Democrat. That makes it totally non-controversial to refer to you as a group, even if you're too petty and dishonest to be an adult about it.
This is a YOU problem.
Hyperventilate all you want about it.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
That's not true at all. I want to ban non-white immigration, end anti-discrimination laws, end the funding of Israel, ban the breeding of animals, have UBI, drastically restrict who should be allowed to vote, and have 90% of policies take place at the state level.
Does it sound like the Democrats represent 99% of my politics?
With 99% of your arguments on this site being Democrat arguments? Of course.
And a handful of non-Democrat opinions in no way disproves that your opinions are almost entirely Democrat. Not that this has any importance or relevance to anything anyone is talking about. Splitting hairs over trivial nonsense is YOUR shtick. I call Democrats Democrats, even when they're only 99% Democrat, even when it triggers them to accurately describe them.
