Scientific facts do not exist

David Jeffrey Spetch

Verified User
It is either a fact or a science of which science is a process that determines recognition of fact. Once verified or falsified as fact, it's no longer a science.

Scientific-facts-do-not-exist.jpg


edited this in fyi "The harnessing of electricity was a science until harnessing electricity became a successful formula thus a fact we harnessed electricity thus no longer a science but a fact. From there what to do with the electricity developed successful formulas which became fact such as the light bulb, radio, television was no longer a science because it became fact. Each new design for each new tv, radio or light bulb for example became fact through a successful formula. You want to create a new television, the science is making a successful formula and once the formula is successful, it is no longer a science but a fact that from that point that the tv exists."

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada
 
Last edited:
That makes zero sense.

It makes perfect sense, your vacant un backed claim is what doesn't make sense.

The harnessing of electricity was a science until harnessing electricity became a successful formula thus a fact we harnessed electricity thus no longer a science but a fact. From there what to do with the electricity developed successful formulas which became fact such as the light bulb, radio, television was no longer a science because it became fact. Each new design for each new tv, radio or light bulb for example became fact through a successful formula. You want to create a new television, the science is making a successful formula and once the formula is successful, it is no longer a science but a fact that from that point that the tv exists.
 
It is either a fact or a science of which science is a process that determines recognition of fact. Once verified or falsified as fact, it's no longer a science.

Scientific-facts-do-not-exist.jpg


edited this in fyi "The harnessing of electricity was a science until harnessing electricity became a successful formula thus a fact we harnessed electricity thus no longer a science but a fact. From there what to do with the electricity developed successful formulas which became fact such as the light bulb, radio, television was no longer a science because it became fact. Each new design for each new tv, radio or light bulb for example became fact through a successful formula. You want to create a new television, the science is making a successful formula and once the formula is successful, it is no longer a science but a fact that from that point that the tv exists."

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada

So much for evolution...………………..
 
How do you come to such a so called conclusion? I share the factual evidence proving evolution

https://www.bitchute.com/video/GsVwKaCxzEM4/

Huh...…...were are the facts? :thinking: Where is the experiment that proves evolution from dead matter? Where is the experiment via the scientific method that verifies that life can be generated from dead matter? The fact that can be proven? Every time that anyone attempts to prove EVOULTION from star dust into life.....the attempt is falsified via the Scientific Method of Objective, Reproducible and Constant results. Life has never been subject to being remanufactured from dead matter (the scientist known as Pasture proved that life only comes from preexisting life of the same species). Science has never proven that any life form has ever evolved into a completely different life form....so evolution outside of species is NOT A FACT of SCIENCE. Its a faith based conjecture that has never been demonstrated to be a fact of physical science. Hell....there is not even a prima facie claim that evolution can be considered TRUE....I have just presented more than 1 instance to establish doubt beyond reason.

On the other hand...…….CREATION has never been falsified by the Scientific Method. It should be simple thing to present the experiment that proves evolution as a fact.....proceed. Find one successful experiment that proves evolution from star dust. Where is the experiment that proves that a Hydrogen atom and a Helium atom.....if left alone will evolve into biological life. Where is the experiment that proves that Hydrogen and or Helium (the elements that constitute a star's fuel) can be arranged to produce another element....turning lead into gold....etc. ?

One question? Has anyone ever actually witnessed the birth of a new STAR? Has a new star suddenly appeared anywhere in the known observable universe from a supposed star birthing cluster? If such a thing were true....new stars would be coming into observation all the time. All anyone actually witnesses is the DEATH of a STAR...never the creation of a NEW FULLY DEVELOPED STAR? Why?
 
Last edited:
It is either a fact or a science of which science is a process that determines recognition of fact. Once verified or falsified as fact, it's no longer a science.

i "The harnessing of electricity was a science until harnessing electricity became a successful formula thus a fact we harnessed electricity thus no longer a science but a fact. From there what to do with the electricity developed successful formulas which became fact such as the light bulb, radio, television was no longer a science because it became fact. Each new design for each new tv, radio or light bulb for example became fact through a successful formula. You want to create a new television, the science is making a successful formula and once the formula is successful, it is no longer a science but a fact that from that point that the tv exists."

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada

Back in the day they called that Sophism, but today it is used to create the false paradigm those profiting off of climate change want to promote
 
Huh...…...were are the facts? :thinking: Where is the experiment that proves evolution from dead matter? Where is the experiment via the scientific method that verifies that life can be generated from dead matter? The fact that can be proven? Every time that anyone attempts to prove EVOULTION from star dust into life.....the attempt is falsified via the Scientific Method of Objective, Reproducible and Constant results. Life has never been subject to being remanufactured from dead matter (the scientist known as Pasture proved that life only comes from preexisting life of the same species). Science has never proven that any life form has ever evolved into a completely different life form....so evolution outside of species is NOT A FACT of SCIENCE. Its a faith based conjecture that has never been demonstrated to be a fact of physical science. Hell....there is not even a prima facie claim that evolution can be considered TRUE....I have just presented more than 1 instance to establish doubt beyond reason.

On the other hand...…….CREATION has never been falsified by the Scientific Method. It should be simple thing to present the experiment that proves evolution as a fact.....proceed. Find one successful experiment that proves evolution from star dust. Where is the experiment that proves that a Hydrogen atom and a Helium atom.....if left alone will evolve into biological life. Where is the experiment that proves that Hydrogen and or Helium (the elements that constitute a star's fuel) can be arranged to produce another element....turning lead into gold....etc. ?

One question? Has anyone ever actually witnessed the birth of a new STAR? Has a new star suddenly appeared anywhere in the known observable universe from a supposed star birthing cluster? If such a thing were true....new stars would be coming into observation all the time. All anyone actually witnesses is the DEATH of a STAR...never the creation of a NEW FULLY DEVELOPED STAR? Why?

Where did I make mention of dead matter? So desperate to force words in someone else's mouth while trying to use that as grounds for an argument lmfao ... You mean I let this thread stew for a while only to find such rubbish?!!

EMT-extreme.jpg


https://www.bitchute.com/video/GsVwKaCxzEM4/

love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada
 
Back in the day they called that Sophism, but today it is used to create the false paradigm those profiting off of climate change want to promote

Those promoting the so called climate change agenda are following religious example of ignore fact, make up lies, call those lies their belief then start trying to force such rubbish on everyone else

The-All-Time-Best-Way-To-Fight-The-So-Called-Climate-Change-Crisis.jpg


love

Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Hamilton Ontario Canada
 
The OP is correct that "scientific facts" do not exist, but not because of whatever inane rambling explanation he gave.

To define our terms, 'science' is "a set of falsifiable theories" and 'fact' is "assumed predicate". There is nothing scientific about a fact. Once a fact is no longer assumed True/False, then it returns to being an argument. Facts are useful for speeding up conversations. Science is useful for gaining understanding about that which is falsifiable.
 
Definition of science
1: the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2a: a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study
the science of theology
b: something (such as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge
have it down to a science
3a: knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method
b: such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : NATURAL SCIENCE
4: a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws
cooking is both a science and an art

m-w.com

Science is a collection of facts.

:oprah:
 
Those promoting the so called climate change agenda are following religious example of ignore fact, make up lies, call those lies their belief then start trying to force such rubbish on everyone else
[/IMG

Nothing there to invalidate what I offered, in fact, nothing there one couldn't hear by tearing on AM radio, lot of accusations, zero content

Next
 
Back
Top