David Jeffrey Spetch
Verified User
The OP is correct that "scientific facts" do not exist, but not because of whatever inane rambling explanation he gave.
To define our terms, 'science' is "a set of falsifiable theories" and 'fact' is "assumed predicate". There is nothing scientific about a fact. Once a fact is no longer assumed True/False, then it returns to being an argument. Facts are useful for speeding up conversations. Science is useful for gaining understanding about that which is falsifiable.
Facts are what verify or falsify belief and theory. There is no argument when it comes to fact, there is no agreeing or disagreeing with fact, there is only recognition of fact or ignorance towards fact. Truth is the garbage that crumbles when pit vs fact every single time.
Sharing fact is quite obviously not rambling explanation but thanks for your jealousy statements.