Seriously? Randall Paul is more of a joke every day!

Truly desperate! They are all so afraid of Hillary it is Hillaryous! Lol


new-york-post-getting-blasted-for-sexist-cover-on-hillary-clintons-benghazi-testimony.jpg


Who's afraid? Bill is...


189654d1363885092-hva-lytter-du-til-i-dag-del-3-20120622052737-rofl.gif
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/07/rand-paul-bill-clinton_n_4745892.html

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) again called out former President Bill Clinton for the Monica Lewinsky scandal -- which took place 16 years ago -- saying Democrats should return any money raised with his help.

I call this desperate.

If this is supposed to be such a slam-dunk against Hillary, why didn't the repubs use it in 2008?

I think Rand Paul is desperate to keep his own name in the news.
 
I think it's a good strategy, tying the presumptive Democrat front-runner to that predator. We don't want him anywhere near the white house again...

Yea, Monica was the "victim"

You do realize that certain women will do almost anything for fame and money. Including seducing a celebrity..

But Monica Lewinsky never showed that she is only trying to make her name famous......has she.........? .....Nah, she is a sell out

 
Two adults in a consensual adulterous relationship, Id say the only possible victim is the spouse, that would be Secretary Clinton! And she's not complaining.


Really, now Lewinsky is the victim?
 
Two adults in a consensual adulterous relationship, Id say the only possible victim is the spouse, that would be Secretary Clinton! And she's not complaining.


Really, now Lewinsky is the victim?

Take Bill Clinton out of it. Let's say this happened in corporate America. The (male) CEO of a company has an affair in his office with a company (female) intern. You don't think there would be cries of workplace sexual harassment coming from some people? That even if it was consensual that it was inappropriate for the CEO to act that way?
 
Take Bill Clinton out of it. Let's say this happened in corporate America. The (male) CEO of a company has an affair in his office with a company (female) intern. You don't think there would be cries of workplace sexual harassment coming from some people? That even if it was consensual that it was inappropriate for the CEO to act that way?

Of course it would be inappropriate, but not harassment if it were consensual.
 
Of course it would be inappropriate, but not harassment if it were consensual.

I could see the argument being made the woman was still a victim due to the power of the CEO and thought she had to go along with him so while technically consensual it really wasn't.
 
I could see the argument being made the woman was still a victim due to the power of the CEO and thought she had to go along with him so while technically consensual it really wasn't.

That's a good argument, especially if the intern really needed the job.

Full disclosure, I've worked with lechers and it wasn't pleasant.
 
Back
Top