LOL
Seriously? Randall Paul is more of a joke every day!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
LOL
christiefan915
Catalyst
Lol, so now it's not harassment, it's attention?
Shame on you for sinking this low just to get in a dig.
christiefan915
Catalyst
It unmistakeable that you have no clue about my experiences in the workplace. Are you that desperate to get in a dig after I called you on your lie yesterday?
evince
Truthmatters
they are going to do to Hilary what the right wing fucks here do to me,
they cant win a debate with me so they tell fucking lies about my clit and how I can or cant get sex.
they are going to talk about Hilary as if she is sex starved because bill wont giver her any and the like.
its all these brain dead idiots can think of to do.
their brains atrophied in middle school
christiefan915
Catalyst
True enough but it's not because Bill was a liability to her.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
This is why nobody takes sexual harassment seriously anymore. Thanks to hypocrites like you
Some might, but its not legally sexual harassment, and you would not hear it from me.
Its her duty to complain to HR, or at least resist in some way. If threats are made to get her to cooperate, then its sexual harassment, if all the evidence shows that the intern was the one to seek out the relationship, its not sexual harassment.
Many conservatives are VERY confused about what SH is.
There is absolutely no evidence BC crossed that line. All the evidence shows it was ML who perused BC.
Enlighten us, what constitutes SH in the WP? Whose standard are you using.
evince
Truthmatters
she wanted him and she was a complete adult.
how degrading to women is it to call an adult women a helpless fool in BCs hands.
If hil and bill had an agreement on side actions then who was fucking harmed?
I swear I think hil and bill had an agreement.
there was nothing illegal that happened
how degrading to women is it to call an adult women a helpless fool in BCs hands.
If hil and bill had an agreement on side actions then who was fucking harmed?
I swear I think hil and bill had an agreement.
there was nothing illegal that happened
cawacko
Well-known member
No Jarod I'm not confused. I've sat through a couple dozen corporate America "sensitivity" and "harassment" training classes. If a person of power makes a move on an underling that can be considered sexual harassment. Doesn't guarantee it is but it can be. And I don't care what you think may or may not hold up in a court of law. If you lose your job it doesn't matter what a court might say. If you effectively lose your ability to lead it doesn't matter what a court may say.
This has nothing to do with liberal or conservative.
Then that is the fault of your Corporation... not politicians, or "liberals".
cawacko
Well-known member
I didn't blame liberals. I switched the conversation to corporations because mentioning Clinton turns into a partisan pissing match.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Look at the hoops these people jump through defending Billy
Then they wonder why they are laughed at when they talk about rape, war on women and sexual harassment. Nobody believes these issues are anything more than political weapons
Then they wonder why they are laughed at when they talk about rape, war on women and sexual harassment. Nobody believes these issues are anything more than political weapons
But Randall Paul is discussing it in a political context, calling ML a victim, when she liked the entire exchange and never complained about it still to this day. By calling her a "victim" they are cheapening what is real sexual harassment, there are plenty of real sh victim.
cawacko
Well-known member
Maybe this is where your white male privilege comes in and you can't put yourself in a young woman's shoes.
A (male) CEO hits on a young woman. She doesn't want to do it but is afraid of losing her job so she goes along. As an intern she is afraid to go to HR and report it because she's intimated by the CEO and afraid no one will believe her or take her side. So she keeps her mouth shut. Her fault?
Speculation! Your assumptions here are implausible; that is, highly unlikely at best absurd at worst.